This article summarizes the essential theoretical and empirical findings of a large-scale doctoral dissertation study on content and language integrated learning (CLIL) streams at German secondary schools (Gymnasium) with up to three content subjects taught in English (Rumlich, 2016). A theoretical account rooted in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL), language acquisition and educational psychology provides the basis for the development of a comprehensive longitudinal model of general EFL proficiency, which incorporates cognitive, affective-motivational, and further individual variables.
In a second step, the model is used to estimate the effects of CLIL on general EFL proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest over a span of two school years (Year 6 to Year 8). The statistical evaluation of the quasi-experimental data from 1,000 learners finds large initial differences prior to CLIL due to selection, preparation, and class composition effects brought about by the implementation of CLIL within streams. After two years, the analyses found no CLIL-related benefits for general EFL proficiency or interest in EFL classes and solely a minor increase in EFL self-concept that might be attributable to CLIL. The results make a strong claim for comprehensive longitudinal model-based evaluations and the inclusion of selection, preparation, and class composition effects when conducting research on CLIL programmes in similar settings. The findings also suggest that not all language competences and affective-motivational dispositions might benefit from CLIL (the way it is currently taught in Germany) to the same extent.
Behörde für Schule, Jugend und Berufsbildung. Amt für Schule, Hamburg (Ed.). (1998). Der Hamburger Schulleistungstest für sechste und siebte Klassen – SL-HAM 6/7 [Hamburg scholastic achievement test for Years 6 and 7]. Hamburg, Germany.
Behörde für Schule, Jugend und Berufsbildung. Amt für Schule, Hamburg (Ed.). (2000). Der Hamburger Schulleistungstest für achte und neunte Klassen – SL-HAM 8/9 [Hamburg scholastic achievement test for Years 8 and 9]. Hamburg, Germany.
Bonnet, A. (2012a). CLIL im Fach Chemie – Wachsende Orchidee und Motor der Integration [Chemistry CLIL: Growing orchid and engine of integration]. In B. Diehr & L. Schmelter (Eds.), Bilingualen Unterricht weiterdenken. Programme, Positionen, Perspektiven [Advancing bilingual teaching. Programmes, positions, perspectives] (pp. 201-215). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Bonnet, A. (2012b). Towards an evidence base of CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 4(1), 66–78.
Bos, W., Bonsen, M., Gröhlich, C., Guill, K., May, P., Rau, A., & Wocken, H. (2009). KESS 7. Kompetenzen und Einstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern – Jahrgangsstufe 7 [Competences and attitudes of male and female students – Year 7]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Bredenbröker, W. (2000). Förderung der fremdsprachlichen Kompetenz durch bilingualen Unterricht: Empirische Untersuchungen [Fostering foreign-language competence through CLIL: Empirical examinations]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Burmeister, P. (1994). Englisch im Bili-Vorlauf: Pilotstudie zur Leistungsfähigkeit des verstärkten Vorlaufs in der 5. Jahrgangsstufe deutsch-englisch bilingualer Zweige in Schleswig-Holstein [English in preparatory CLIL classes: Pilot study on the efficiency of additional language classes in Year 5 of German-English bilingual streams in Schleswig-Holstein]. Kiel, Germany: l&f.
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–375.
Council of the European Union. (2008). 2868th Council meeting: Education, youth and culture. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning. Motivating learners and teachers. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 4. Second and foreign language education (2nd ed., pp. 97–112). New York, NY: Springer.
Dallinger, S. (2015). Die Wirksamkeit bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts: Selektionseffekte, Leistungsentwicklung und die Rolle der Sprachen im deutsch-englischen Geschichtsunterricht [The effectiveness of CLIL: Selection effects, development of achievement and the role of languages in German-English history classes] (PhD Dissertation [original, unpublished version]). Ludwigsburg, Germany: Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee, & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 117–122.
Daniels, Z. (2008). Entwicklung schulischer Interessen im Jugendalter [Development of school-related interests during adolescence]. Münster: Waxmann.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Eccles [Parsons], J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23(3), 290–325.
Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Fehling, S. (2008). Language awareness und bilingualer Unterricht: Eine komparative Studie [Language awareness and CLIL: A comparative study] (2nd ed.). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Fruhauf, G. (1996). Introduction. In G. Fruhauf, D. Coyle, & I. Christ (Eds.), Teaching content in a foreign language (pp. 7–11). Alkmaar, Netherlands: Stichting Europees Platform voor het Nederlandse Onderwijs.
Gamoran, A. (2008). Creaming. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences: Vol. 2. Cohabitation – ethics in experimentation (2nd ed., pp. 160f). Chicago, IL: Gale. Retrieved from <[URL]>
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Grotjahn, R. (2011). C-Tests – Aspekte der Validität [Aspects of validity]. Deutsch als Fremdsprache [German as a foreign language], 48(3), 131–137.
Hastings, A. J. (2002). Error analysis of an English C-test: Evidence for integrated processing. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Der C-Test. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen [The C-Test. Theoretical basics and practical applications] (pp. 53–66). Bochum, Germany: AKS.
Helmke, A., & Weinert, F. E. (1997). Bedingungsfaktoren schulischer Leistung [Determinants of scholastic achievement]. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Themenbereich D: Praxisgebiete. Serie 1: Pädagogische Psychologie: Vol. 3. Psychologie des Unterrichtens und der Schule [Encyclopedia of psychology. Topic area D: Practical areas. Series 1: Educational psychology. Vol. 3. Psychology of teaching and school] (pp. 71–176). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Köller, O., Leucht, M., & Pant, H. A. (2012). Effekte bilingualen Unterrichts auf die Englischleistungen in der Sekundarstufe I [Effects of CLIL on English achievement at lower secondary level]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40(4), 334–350.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383–409.
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 11, 30–41.
Lehmann, R. H. (2003). Aspects of national and international surveys of student achievement in English as a foreign language. In J. Rymarczyk & H. Haudeck (Eds.), In search of the active learner. Untersuchungen zu Fremdsprachenunterricht, bilingualen und interdisziplinären Kontexten [Studies on foreign language teaching, bilingual and interdisciplinary contexts] (pp. 155–162). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Lehmann, R. H., Gansfus, R., & Husfeldt, V. (2011). LAU 9. Aspekte der Lernausgangslage und Lernentwicklung – Klassenstufe 9 [Aspects of initial conditions of learning and learning development – Year 9]. In Behörde für Schule, Jugend und Berufsbildung (Ed.), LAU – Aspekte der Lernerausgangslage und der Lernerentwicklung. Klassenstufen 5, 7 und 9 (pp. 293–451). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Lorenzo, F. (2007). The sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language planning and language change in 21st century Europe. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20(1), 27–38.
Marsh, D. (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. In D. Marsh & G. Langé (Eds.), Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – the European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Jyväskylä, Finland: UniCOM, Continuing Education Centre. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Marsh, D., & Langé, G. (Eds.). (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.
Marsh, H. W. (2006). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.
Marsh, H. W., & Scalas, L. F. (2010). Self-concept in learning: Reciprocal effects model between academic self-concept and academic achievement. In P. L. Peterson, E. L. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 660–667). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Mercer, S. (2011). Frames of reference used by language learners in forming their self-concepts. Forum Sprache, 3(2), 6–22.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. Y.-L. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Navés, T. (2010). What makes good CLIL teaching and learning? Paper presented at the 25th GRETA Convention: Celebrating 25 years of teacher inspiration. Granada: University of Granada.
Nold, G., Hartig, J., Hinz, S., & Rossa, H. (2008). Klassen mit bilingualem Sachfachunterricht: Englisch als Arbeitssprache [Classes with CLIL: English as working language/English as a medium of instruction]. In E. Klieme (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie [Teaching and competence acquisition in German and English. Results of the DESI study] (pp. 451–457). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.
Rumlich, D. (2015). Zur affektiv-motivationalen Entwicklung von Lernenden im bilingualen Sachfachunterricht [About the affective-motivational development of learners in CLIL] In B. Rüschoff, J.-T. Sudhoff, & D. Wolff (Eds.), CLIL Revisited: Eine kritische Analyse des gegenwärtigen Standes des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts [CLIL revisited: A critical analysis of the state of the art of bilingual teaching] (pp. 309-330). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Subramaniam, P. R. (2009). Motivational effects on student engagement and learning in physical education: A review. International Journal of Physical Education, 46(2), 11–19. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Ting, T. Y.-L. (2010). CLIL appeals to how the brain likes its information: Examples from CLIL-(neuro)science. International CLIL Research Journal, 3(1), 3–18.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman., Eds.) (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930–1934]).
Wesche, M. B. (2002). Early French immersion: How has the original Canadian model stood the test of time? In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development – Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 357–379). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Wolff, D. (1997). Zur Förderung von Sprachbewusstheit und Sprachlernbewusstheit im bilingualen Sachfachunterricht [About facilitating language awareness and language learning awareness in CLIL]. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen [Learning and teaching foreign languages], 261, 167–183.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. (2007). ConQuest Manual. Camberwell, Australia: Acer Press.
Zaunbauer, A. C. M., Retelsdorf, J., & Möller, J. (2009). Die Vorhersage von Englischleistungen am Anfang der Sekundarstufe [The prediction of English achievement at the beginning of lower secondary level]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie [Journal for Developmental Psychology and Educational Psychology], 41(3), 153–164.
Zydatiß, W. (2007). Deutsch-Englische Züge in Berlin (DEZIBEL): Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts an Gymnasien [German-English streams in Berlin: An evaluation of CLIL at Gymnasien]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Geoghegan, Leah
2024. The effect of CLIL on productive thematic vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 518 ff.
Hidalgo, María Ángeles & Izaskun Villarreal
2024. Intensity matters in CLIL: Evidence from primary school learners’ receptive skills. System 125 ► pp. 103402 ff.
Wunberg, Marlene, Jürgen Baumert, Maja Feddermann, Julian F. Lohmann & Jens Möller
2024. CLIL effects on academic self-concepts: Positive effects in English but detrimental effects in math?. Learning and Instruction 92 ► pp. 101923 ff.
Zhu, Yan, Bo Peng, Dingfang Shu & Fangyuan Du
2024. Unpacking Chinese young learners’ L2 learning motivation: Does CLIL make a difference?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 952 ff.
Buckingham, Lyndsay R., Miguel Fernández Álvarez & Ana Halbach
2023. Differences between CLIL and non-CLIL students: motivation, autonomy and identity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 44:7 ► pp. 626 ff.
2023. Effects of EMI-CLIL on secondary-level students’ English learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Bulté, Bram, Jill Surmont & Liesbeth Martens
2022. The impact of CLIL on the L2 French and L1 Dutch proficiency of Flemish secondary school pupils. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:9 ► pp. 3151 ff.
2024. Students’ language and subject learning attitudes in CLIL secondary education. The Language Learning Journal► pp. 1 ff.
Martí Arnándiz, Otilia, Lidon Moliner & Francisco Alegre
2022. When CLIL is for all: Improving learner motivation through peer-tutoring in Mathematics. System 106 ► pp. 102773 ff.
Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios
2021. To what extent do affective variables correlate with content learning achievement in CLIL programmes?. Language and Education 35:3 ► pp. 226 ff.
Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios
2022. Do CLIL programmes help to balance out gender differences in content and language achievement?. Language, Culture and Curriculum 35:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
Martínez-Agudo, Juan de Dios
2019. To what extent can CLIL learners’ oral competence outcomes be explained by contextual differences? Updated empirical evidence from Spain. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 37:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Olsson, Eva
2021. A comparative study of CLIL implementation in upper secondary school in Sweden and students’ development of L2 English academic vocabulary. Language Teaching Research► pp. 136216882110450 ff.
Bower, Kim
2020. School leaders’ perspectives on content and language integrated learning in England. Language, Culture and Curriculum 33:4 ► pp. 351 ff.
Palacios Hidalgo, Francisco Javier
2020. Moving Towards CLIL 2.0. In Handbook of Research on Bilingual and Intercultural Education [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 359 ff.
Palacios Hidalgo, Francisco Javier
2022. Moving Towards CLIL 2.0. In Research Anthology on Applying Social Networking Strategies to Classrooms and Libraries, ► pp. 224 ff.
2019. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal 18:6 ► pp. 675 ff.
San Isidro, Xabier & David Lasagabaster
2019. The impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research 23:5 ► pp. 584 ff.
San Isidro, Xabier & David Lasagabaster
2019. Code-switching in a CLIL multilingual setting: a longitudinal qualitative study. International Journal of Multilingualism 16:3 ► pp. 336 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.