Using four tweets by Steven Salaita about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that resulted in the retraction of his academic job offer in September 2014 as our case study, we investigate the role of Twitter in the shaping and reception of the controversial messages. Our analysis combines Gricean pragmatics with im/politeness and hate-speech research to reveal a complex layering of potential meanings stemming from what is linguistically encoded in each tweet. Their construal as hate speech, in particular, depends on which of these potential meanings critics chose to focus upon. We account for this finding by considering the diversity of potential audiences of a tweet and suggest that the effects of context collapse on implicated meanings can be especially detrimental. Competition for attention among incoming tweets, Twitter’s central affiliative function and applicable length restrictions can, nevertheless, place a premium on communicating such meanings.
Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bach, Kent. 1994. “Conversational Implicature.” Mind & Language 9 (2):124–162.
Bekafigo, Marina A., and Allan McBride. 2013. “Who Tweets about Politics? Political Participation of Twitter Users during the 2011 Gubernatorial Elections.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 625–643.
boyd, danah, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan. 2010. “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, January 5–8, 1–10.
Brody, Samuel, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2011. “Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Using Word Lengthening to Detect Sentiment in Microblogs.” In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 562–570. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. (1978) 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed). Boston: Heinle Publishers.
Cole, Peter. 1975. “The Synchronic and Diachronic Status of Conversational Implicature.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 257–288. New York: Academic Press.
Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. “Political Polarization on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, 89–96. Menlo Park, California: The AAAI Press.
Davis, James. 2000. Threats and Promises: The Pursuit of International Influence. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
Eisenstein, Jacob. 2013. “What to Do about Bad Language on the Internet.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL), 359–369. Atlanta, GA: Association for Computational Linguistics
Finin, Tim, Will Murnane, Anand Karandikar, Nicholas Keller, Justin Martineau, and Mark Dredze. 2010. “Annotating Named Entities in Twitter Data with Crowdsourcing.” In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, 80–88. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Geis, Michael L., and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. “On Invited Inferences.” Linguistic Inquiry 2(4): 561–566.
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grice, H. Paul. (1969) 1989. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions.” In Philosophical Review 78(2): 147–177. Reprinted in Grice, H. Paul, Studies in the way of words, 86–116. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. Paul. (1975) 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 31: 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Grice, H. Paul, Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Edward. 1976. Beyond Culture. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
Harris, Sandra. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 121: 451–472.
Haugh, Michael. 2014. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hernández Ortiz, Hector, and Joseph S. Fulda. 2012. “Strengthening the Antecedent, Concessive Conditionals, Conditional Rhetorical Questions, and the Theory of Conditional Elements.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (3): 328–331.
Himelboim, Itai, Stephen McCreery, and Marc Smith. 2013. “Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-ideology Exposure on Twitter.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (2): 154–174.
Horn, Laurence. 1984. “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, 421: 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Horn, Laurence. 2000. “From if to iff: Conditional Perfection as Pragmatic Strengthening.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(3): 289–326.
Infante, Dominic A., and Charles J. Wigley III. 1986. “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure.” Communications Monographs 53 (1):61–69.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1996. La Conversation. Paris: Seuil.
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “The Logic of Politeness: Or, Minding Your P’s and Q’s.” In C. Corum, T. Smith-Stark & A. Weiser (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, 292–305. Chicago, USA: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Leech, Geoffrey N.1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey N.2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leets, Laura. 2001. “Responses to Internet Hate Sites: Is Speech too Free in Cyberspace?” Communication Law and Policy 6(2): 287–317.
Leets, Laura. 2003. “Disentangling Perceptions of Subtle Racist Speech: A Cultural Perspective.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22 (2):145–168.
Leets, Laura, and Howard Giles. 1997. “Words as Weapons – When do they Wound? Investigations of Harmful Speech.” Human Communication Research 24 (2): 260–301.
Lipinski-Harten, Maciek, and Romin W. Tafarodi. 2013. “Attitude Moderation: A Comparison of Online Chat and Face-to-Face Conversation.” Computers in Human Behavior 29(6): 2490–2493.
Liu, Zhe, and Ingmar Weber. 2014. “Is Twitter a Public Sphere for Online Conflicts? A Cross-ideological and Cross-hierarchical Look.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Social Informatics (SocInfo2014), 336–347. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13(1):114–133
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nehring, Holger. 2011. “‘Civility’ in History: Some Observations on the History of the Concept.” European Review of History: Revue europeenne d’histoire 18 (03):313–333.
Nowak, John E., Ronald D. Rotunda, and Jesse N. Young. 1986. Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure. St. Paul, MN: West.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2):259–283.
Sedler, Robert. 1992. The unconstitutionality of campus bans on “racist speech”: The view from without and within. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 531, 631–683.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Squires, Lauren. 2016. “Twitter: Design, Discourse, and the Implications of Public Text.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited by Alexandra Georgakopoulou and Tereza Spilioti, 239–255. London: Routledge.
Squires, Lauren, and Josh Iorio. 2014. “Tweets in the News. Legitimizing Medium, Standardizing Form.” In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, edited by Jannis Androutsopoulos, 331–360. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking norms of Im/politeness across Time and Space.” Journal of Politeness Research 7 (2): 159–185.
Watts, Richard. 2002. “From Polite Language to Educated Language: The Re-emergence of an Ideology.” In Alternative Histories of English, edited by Richard J. Watts and Peter Trudgill, 155–172. London: Routledge.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 788–806.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How we Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. New York: Continuum.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “Coffeetweets: Bonding around the Bean on Twitter.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, edited by Peter Seargeant and Caroline Tagg, 139–160. London: Palgrave.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Georgalidou, Marianthi
2024. Humorous Genres and Modes in Greek Political Discourse. In Political Humor Worldwide [The Language of Politics, ], ► pp. 49 ff.
Salimi, Esmaeel Ali & Seyed Mohammadreza Mortazavi
2024. Impoliteness in Twitter Discourse: a Case Study of Replies to Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 14 ► pp. 86 ff.
Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammadreza, Hamed Zandi & Mohammad Makki
2022. (Online) public denunciation, public incivilities and offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 44 ff.
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2022. Offence and morality: Pragmatic perspectives. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 117 ff.
Strani, Katerina & Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak
2022. Online Hate Speech in the UK and Poland: A Case-Study of Online Reactions to the Killing of Arkadiusz Jóźwik. In Cyberhate in the Context of Migrations, ► pp. 21 ff.
2022. Non-literal Communication in Chinese Internet Spaces: A Case Study of Fishing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6:CSCW1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff.
Boxer, Diana & Florencia Cortés-Conde
2021. Social Groups and Relational Networks. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 227 ff.
Vásquez, Camilla
2021. “I appreciate u not being a total prick …”: Oppositional stancetaking, impoliteness and relational work in adversarial Twitter interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 185 ► pp. 40 ff.
Xie, Chaoqun & Francisco Yus
2021. Digitally Mediated Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 454 ff.
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2020. Creation, dissemination and uptake of fake-quotes in lay political discourse on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 157 ► pp. 101 ff.
2020. Fostering civility and politeness awareness in professional discourse: Critical genre analysis of course books in professional communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
2019. Moral impoliteness. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Sifianou, Maria
2019. Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship?. Journal of Pragmatics 147 ► pp. 49 ff.
Sifianou, Maria
2024. Dangerous politeness? Understandings of politeness in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.