Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 6:1 (2018) ► pp.107–126

Swearing, moral order, and online communication

| Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, USA

This paper addresses problems with swearing on the internet. The opening section of the paper defines swearing (uttering offensive emotional speech) as a ubiquitous form of impolite human behavior. Swearing can occur wherever humans communicate with each other and that it appears in computer-mediated communication (CMC) is not surprising. The second section documents how swearwords appear in email, blogs, Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, and YouTube and in other practices and sites (trolling, 4chan). Swearword use is situated in the context of emerging research on impoliteness and moral order (politeness norms and standards that govern internet behavior). Online swearword use is a function of moral order, as well as users’ interpersonal characteristics such as age (younger more likely than older users), gender (men more likely than women), the time of day (later in the day and evening), and a website’s social composition (adversarial and male dominated more than homogeneous friendly sites). The paper concludes with suggestions for dealing with internet swearword use where regulation is desirable and feasible. Websites and communities should develop moral order norms that at a minimum restrict illegal forms of speech (e.g., credible threats of violence, workplace sexual harassment).

Keywords: swearing, moral order, trolling, impoliteness, e-bile, pragmatics, morality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research reporting online swearword use
    • Email
    • Chat rooms and MySpace
    • Twitter
    • Blogs
  • 3.Additional practices and sites associated with swearword use
    • Trolling
    • 4chan
    • Cuckservative
  • 4.Moral order and online swearing
  • 5.When should we censor? Can we have free expression free from harm?
  • 6.Conclusion and suggestions
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00005.jay
References (61)

References

Adams, Michael
2016 In Praise of Profanity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2014 “Historical Pragmatics: Evidence from the Old Bailey.” Transactions of the Philological Society 1121: 259–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arndt, Horst, and Richard Janney
1985 “Politeness Revisited: Cross-modal Supportive Strategies.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 231: 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, Leslie
1995 “Polite Fictions: Instrumental Rudeness as Pragmatic Competence.” In Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Sociolinguistic aspects. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, edited by James Alatis, Carolyn Straehle, Maggie Ronkin and Brent Gallenberger, 154–168. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin
2016 What the F: What Swearing Reveals About Our Language, Our Brains, Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garces-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2): 226–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2007 “Beginnings, Middles, and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2185–2216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chretien, Katherine, S. Ryan Greysen, Jean-Paul Chretien, and Terry Kind
2009 “Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students.” JAMA 3021: 1309–1315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duehren, Andrew, C. Ramsey Fahs, and Daphne Thompson
2016 “Harvard Cancels Men’s Soccer Season after Finding Sexually Explicit “Reports” Continued Through 2016.” The Crimson, November 4. Retrieved from: [URL]
Dwyer, Dialynn
2016 “Amherst College Suspends Men’s Cross Country Team Activities Over ‘Racist, Misogynist’ Emails.” Boston.Com, December 12. Retrieved from: [URL].
Finn, Jerry, and Mary Banach
2000 “Victimization Online: The Downside of Seeking Human Services for Women on the Internet.” CyberPsychology and Behavior 31: 785–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, David
2016 “The Price I’ve Paid for Opposing Donald Trump.” National Review, October 21. Retrieved from: [URL].
Fullwood, Chris, Karen Melrose, Neil Morris, and Sarah Floyd
2012 “Sex, Blogs, and Baring Your Soul: Factors Influencing UK Blogging Strategies.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 641: 345–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, Michael, Adrien Guille, Fabien Rico, and Anthony Deseille
2015, 2016 “Text Mining and Twitter to Analyze British Swearing Habits.” In Twitter for Research Handbook, edited by Clement Levallois, Morgane Marchand, Tiago Mata and Aandre Panisson, 27–43. Paris: Emlyon Press.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Michele, et al
2011 “Differences between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study.” Science 3321: 1100–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Jesse, and Jonathan Haidt
2010 “Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals into Moral Communities.” Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin 14(1): 140–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan
2012 The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(2): 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Uh….not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 58–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heins, Marjorie
2007 Not in Front of the Children: Indecency, Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan
1994 “Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Communication: Bringing Familiar Baggage to the New Frontier.” Keynote Talk at the American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan, and Sanja Kapidzic
2015 “Teens, Gender, and Self-Presentation in Social Media.” In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, edited by James Wright, 146–152. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jane, Emma
2014 “ ‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 281: 558–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Kristin, and Timothy B. Jay
2013 “A Child’s Garden of Curses: A Gender, Historical, and Age-Related Evaluation of the Taboo Lexicon.” American Journal of Psychology 1261: 459–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Taboo Word Fluency and Knowledge of Slurs and General Pejoratives: Deconstructing the Poverty-of-Vocabulary Myth.” Language Sciences 521: 251–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy B.
1992 Cursing in America. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Improving School Conduct Codes: Clarity about Unacceptable Speech.” ERIC Document Reproduction Service EA 026 417.Google Scholar
2000 Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-Social Theory of Speech. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003 The Psychology of Language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
2009a “The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words.” Perspectives in Psychological Science 41: 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b “Do Offensive Words Harm People?” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 151: 81–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 We Did What!? The History of Offensive and Inappropriate Behavior in American History. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy B., Catherine Caldwell-Harris, and Krista King
2005 “Recalling Taboo and Nontaboo words.” American Journal of Psychology 1211: 83–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy B., and Kristin Janschewitz
2007 “Filling the Emotion Gap in Linguistic Theory: Commentary on Potts’ Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics 331: 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Pragmatics of Swearing.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 267–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy B., Krista King, and Timothy Duncan
2006 “Memories of Punishment for Cursing.” Sex Roles 321: 123–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter
2015 “Impoliteness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 239–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1990 “Linguistic Politeness: Current Research Issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1989 “The Limits of Politeness: Therapeutic and Courtroom Discourse.” Multilingua 81: 101–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, Amanda
2015 Teens, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul, and Martha Nussbaum
2010 The Offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam
2010 “Introduction: Politeness and Impoliteness in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maia, Rousiley, and Thaiane Rezende
2016 “Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths to Political Talk.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 211: 121–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massingdale, Lee
2009 Human Rights in China. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Pub.Google Scholar
Mele, Christopher
2016 “Princeton is the Latest Ivy League School to Suspend Team over Vulgar Materials.” New York Times, December 15. Retrieved from: [URL]
Patchin, Justin, and Sameer Hinduja
2010 “Trends in Online Social Networking: Adolescent Use of MySpace over Time.” New Media and Society 121: 197–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rideout, Victoria, Ulla Foehr, and Donald Roberts
2010 Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8- to-18-Year-Olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from: [URL]
Schwartz, Shalom
1994 “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues 50(4): 19–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Kádár
2016 “The Bases of Impoliteness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spertus, Ellen
1997 Smokey: Automatic Recognition of Hostile Messages. Paper Presented at Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI). American Association for Artificial Intelligence, July.
Stryker, Cole
2011 Epic Win for Anonymous: How 4chan’s Army Conquered the Web. New York: The Overlook Press.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, David Smahel, and Patricia Greenfield
2006 “Connecting Developmental Constructions to the Internet: Identity Presentation and Sexual Exploration in Online Teen Chat Rooms.” Developmental Psychology 431: 395–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelwall, Mike
2008 “Fk Yea I Swear: Cursing and Gender in a Corpus of MySpace Pages.” Corpora 3(1): 83–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1983 “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure.” Applied Linguistics 41: 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turnage, Anna
2008 “Email Flaming Behaviors and Organizational Conflict.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 131: 43–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Rob
2002 “Indigenous Young Australians, Criminal Justice and Offensive Language.” Journal of Youth Studies 51: 21–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2024. Introduction. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Beers Fägersten, Kristy & Karyn Stapleton
2022. Swearing. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Downes, Lynn
2022. “I say it but wouldn't be happy hearing it from a kid”: Personal boundary parameters in responding to taboo language, swearing and -IST-ing use. International Journal of Educational Research 111 ► pp. 101906 ff. DOI logo
Pillai, Varsha & Munmun Ghosh
2022. Indian female Twitter influencers’ perceptions of trolls. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Zhao, Ming
2022. Swearing in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties. International Journal of Language and Culture 9:1 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Диса , Олена & Артем Чумак
2022. ПСИХОЛОГІЧНІ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ НЕНОРМАТИВНОЇ ЛЕКСИКИ У МІЖОСОБИСНІСНІЙ КОМУНІКАЦІЇ. Psychological Prospects Journal :39 DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Downes, Lynn, Margaret Kettle, Peter O'Brien & Gordon Tait
2021. Responsibilisation and acceptable verbal behaviour in schools: Teachers and leaders arbitrating the boundaries of swearing. Linguistics and Education 61 ► pp. 100898 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I. M. Poppi
2020. Arcana imperii*. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2019. Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2020. Urban interaction ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Theunissen, Petra
2019. Extending public relationship-building through the theory of politeness. Public Relations Review 45:3 ► pp. 101784 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.