Article published in:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 6:1 (2018) ► pp. 127148
References
Aalberg, Toril, and Anders Todal Jenssen
2007 “Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication.” Nordicom Review 281: 17–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates
2008 “Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items.” Journal of Memory and Language 591: 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bandwart, Mary C.
2010 “Gender and Candidate Communication: Effects of Stereotypes in the 2008 Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 541: 265–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L., and William T. Wells
1996Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Gregory A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz
2012 “Evaluating Online Labor markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 201: 351–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, Michael, Tracy Kwang, and Samuel D. Gosling
2011 “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?Perspectives on Psychological Science 61: 3–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells
2012 “Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 311: 30–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Michael, and R. S. Klingle
1998 “Gender Differences in Being Influential and/or Influenced: A Challenge to Prior Explanations.” In Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction edited by Daniel J. Canary and Kathryn Dindia, 257–285. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2003 “Gender and Language Ideologies.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 447–467. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carli, Linda L.
2001 “Gender and Social Influence.” Journal of Social Issues 571: 725–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, Luciana, and Luigi Castelli
2010 “The Implicit and Explicit Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: Is the Source Really Blamed?Political Psychology 311: 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, Luciana, Bertram Gawronski, and Luigi Castelli
2010 “Losing on All Fronts: The Effects of Negative versus Positive Person-based Campaigns on Implicit and Explicit Evaluations of Political Candidates.” The British Journal of Social Psychology 491: 453–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Diana B., and Kelly L. Winfrey
2009 “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies 601: 326–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics
2016 “Women in Elective Office 2016.” Accessed January 24, 2017. http://​www​.cawp​.rutgers​.edu​/women​-elective​-office​-2016.
Chang, Chingching, and Jacqueline C. Bush Hitchon
2004 “When Does Gender Count? Further Insights into Gender Schematic Processing of Female Candidates’ Political Advertisements.” Sex Roles 511: 197–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dinzes, Deborah, Michael D. Cozzens, and George G. Manross
1994 “The Role of Gender in ‘Attack Ads’: Revisiting Negative Political Advertising.” Communication Research Reports 111: 67–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen
2014When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates & Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Valerie C., Linda L. Kaid, and Sandra Ragan
1990 “The Impact of Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggression on Communicator Image: The Exchange between George Bush and Dan Rather.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 541: 99–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Chad, and Scott A. Myers
2007 “Perceived Instructor Credibility as a Function of Instructor Aggressive Communication.” Communication Research Reports 261: 47–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgalidou, Marianthi
2017 “Addressing Women in the Greek Parliament: Institutionalized Confrontation or Sexist Aggression.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5 (1): 30–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Joanna Everitt
2003 “Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage.” Political Communication 201: 209–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Harness, Marjorie
2006The Hidden Life of Girls. Games of Stance, Status and Exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Ann, and Jerry L. Miller
2005When Stereotypes Collide: Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Videostyle in Congressional Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ann, David M. Shafie, and Ann N. Crigler
2003 “Is Negative Advertising Effective for Female Candidates? An Experiment in Voters’ Use of Gender Stereotypes.” Press/Politics 81: 35–53.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., and Jennifer C. Lucas
2006 “The Fairer Sex? Gender and Negative Campaigning in U.S. Elections.” American Politics Research 341: 69–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hitchon, Jacqueline C., and Chingching Chang
1995 “Effects of Gender Schematic Processing on the Reception of Political Commercials for Men and Women Candidates.” Communication Research 221: 430–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hitchon, Jacqueline C., Chingching Chang, and Rhonda Harris
1997 “Should Women Emote? Perceptual Bias and Opinion Change in Response to Political Ads for Candidates of Different Genders.” Political Communication 141: 49–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Janet S.
2005 “The Gender Similarities Hypothesis.” American Psychologist 601: 581–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “New Directions in the Study of Gender Similarities and Differences.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 161: 259–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Infante, Dominic A.
1987 “Aggression.” In Personality and interpersonal communication, edited by James C. McCroskey and John A. Daly, 157–192. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Infante, Dominic A., Karen C. Hartley, Matthew M. Martin, Mary Anne Higgins, Stephen D. Bruning, and Gyeongho Hur
1992 “Initiating and Reciprocating Verbal Aggression: Effects on Credibility and Credited Valid Arguments.” Communication Studies 431: 182–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Infante, Dominic A., and Andrew S. Rancer
1996 “Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: A Review of Theory and Research.” In Communication Yearbook, Vol. 191, edited by D. Burleson, 319–351. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Infante, Dominic A., and Charles J. Wigley III
1986 “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure.” Communication Monographs 531: 61–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs
1983 “Generalizing About Messages: Suggestions for Design and Analysis of Experiments.” Human Communication Research 91: 169–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jordan-Jackson, Felicia F., Yang Lin, Andrew S. Rancer, and Dominic A. Infante
2008 “Perceptions of Males’ and Females’ Use of Affirming and Nonaffirming Messages in an Interpersonal Dispute: You’ve Come a Long Way Baby?Western Journal of Communication 721: 239–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn
1994 “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” The American Political Science Review 881: 560–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Gerald M. Pomper
2004Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, and Ivy B. Rovner
2007 “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” The Journal of Politics 691: 1176–1209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Winter, and Siddharth Suri
2012 “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods 441: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie
1998 “ ‘I Don’t Smile Much Any More’: Affect, Gender and the Discourse of Pittsburgh Police Officers.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, edited by Jennifer Coates, 309–327. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCroskey, James C., and Jason J. Teven
1999 “Goodwill: A Reexamination of the Construct and Its Measurement.” Communication Monographs 661: 90–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nau, Charlotte, and Craig O. Stewart
2014 “Effects of Verbal Aggression and Party Identification Bias on Perceptions of Political Speakers.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 331: 526–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel
2002Persuasion: Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Sheri Kunovich, and Melanie M. Hughes
2007 “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 331: 263–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seiter, John S., and Robert H. Gass
2010 “Aggressive Communication in Political Contexts.” In Arguments, Aggression, and Conflict: New Directions in Theory and Research, edited by Theodore A. Avtgis and Andrew S. Rancer, 217–240. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia
2006 “Governed by Rules?: The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates.” In Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, edited by Judith Baxter, 81–102. New York, NY: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mary
2003 “Gender Stereotypes: Reproduction and Challenge.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 468–486. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Rachel
2012 “Todd Akin: Claire McCaskill Was More ‘Ladylike’ in 2006.” The Washington Post, September 27. Accessed January 24, 2017. http://​www​.washingtonpost​.com​/blogs​/post​-politics​/wp​/2012​/09​/27​/akin​-mccaskill​-was​-more​-ladylike​-in​-2006/
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Richards, Adam S., Patrick Rice & Loni Covington
2021. Petty in Pink: Clothing Color Moderates Audience Perceptions of a Female Politician’s Verbal Aggression. Journal of Language and Social Psychology  pp. 0261927X2110453 ff. Crossref logo
Van Duyn, Emily, Cynthia Peacock & Natalie Jomini Stroud
2021. The Gender Gap in Online News Comment Sections. Social Science Computer Review 39:2  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.