References (54)


Alberts, J. K.
1988 “An Analysis of Couples’ Conversational Complaint Interactions.” Communication Monographs 55 (2): 184–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “A Descriptive Taxonomy of Couples’ Complaints.” Southern Communication Journal 54 (2): 125–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1997Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas Albert Sebeok, 253–76. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana
1993Complaining and Commiserating: A Speech Act View of Solidarity in Spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde
1997 “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3): 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buttny, Richard
1993Social Accountability in Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cortés-Conde, Florencia, and Diana Boxer
2010 “Humorous Self Disclosures as Resistance to Socially Imposed Gender Roles.” Gender and Language 4 (1): 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, Karen L.
1996 “Sources of Tension in the Aging Mother and Adult Daughter Relationship.” Psychology and Aging 11 (4): 591–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, Karen L., Pei Chun Chen, Elizabeth Hay, Kelly E. Cichy, and Eva S. Lefkowitz
2006 “Ambivalent Reactions in the Parent and Offspring Relationship.” The Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 61 (3): 152–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fivush, Robyn
2002, April. “The Co-construction of Identity in Family Narratives.” MARIAL. The Emory Center for Myth and Ritual in American Life: A Sloan Center for Working Families, Emory University. Available at: [URL]. Accessed: 03-15-07.
2013 “Family Reminiscing and the Construction of the Autobiographical Self.” Interacções 9 (24): 170–213.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1974Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1997 “Frame Analysis: From Felicity’s Condition.” In The Goffman Reader, edited by Charles Lemert and Ann Branaman, 167–200. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia
2004 “ ‘Al Gore’s Our Guy’: Linguistically Constructing a Family Political Identity.” Discourse & Society 15 (5): 607–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “ ‘I Just Feel Horribly Embarrassed When She Does That’: Constituting a Mother’s Identity.” In Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families, edited by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 71–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Impression Management on Reality TV: Emotion in Parental Accounts.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3551–3564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
2012 “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 430–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Sally, and Elinor Ochs
1995 “Co-construction: An Introduction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 171–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “Transcript Notation.” In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, ix–xvi, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987 “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, edited by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah
2007 “The Co-Construction of Roles and Patterns of Interaction in Family Discourse.” Teachers College, Columbia University, Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 7 (2).Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah J.
2011 “Discursive Practices in Family Discourse: Co-Constructing the Identity of Adult Children.” EdD diss., Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3484360).Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah
2012, September. “The Discursive Practices of “Guilting” in Family Discourse: Socialization, Identity Construction, and Parental Expectations.” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of Language and Social Interaction Working Group (LANSI), Teachers College, New York City.
Johnson, Rebekah J.
2015 “Tensions in Family Discourse: Expectations and Justifications.” In Linking Discourse Studies to Professional Practice, edited by Lubie Grujicic-Alatriste, 203–226. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Shari
2008 “The Balancing Act: Framing Gendered Parental Identities at Dinnertime.” Language in Society 37 (4): 539–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinova, Diana
2007 “Finding the Right Balance between Connection and Control: A Father’s Identity Construction in Conversations with His College-Age Daughter.” In Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families, edited by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 103–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor
1992 “Family Narrative as Political Activity.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 301–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “Mothers’ Role in the Everyday Reconstruction of ‘Father Knows Best.’” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, edited by Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, and Birch Moonwoman, 447–462. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Paugh, Amy L.
2005 “Learning About Work at Dinnertime: Language Socialization in Dual-Earner American Families.” Discourse & Society 16 (1): 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2003 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 229–249. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Volume 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman
1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterponi, Laura
2003 “Account Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday Interaction.” Discourse Studies 5 (1): 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Straehle, Carolyn A.
1993 “ ‘Samuel?’ ‘Yes, dear?’: Teasing and Conversational Rapport.” In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 210–230. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
1993a “What’s in a Frame?”. In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 14–56. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1993b “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 165–188. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001I Only Say This Because I Love You: How the Way We Talk Can Make or Break Family Relationships Throughout Our Lives. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
2003a “Gender and Family Interaction.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 179–201. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b “Power Maneuvers or Connection Maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction.” In Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond, edited by Deborah Tannen and James E. Alatis, 50–62. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Talking the Dog: Framing Pets as Interactional Resources in Family Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (4): 399–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon
(Eds.) 2007Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Carolyn E.
1995 “ ‘You Think It Was a Fight?’: Co-Constructing (the Struggle for) Meaning, Face, and Family in Everyday Narrative Activity.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 283–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ten Have, Paul
2007Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traverso, Veronique
2009 “The Dilemmas of Third-Party Complaints in Conversation between Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2385–2399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
1991Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Muriel Schulz
1986The Language of Love and Guilt. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Liu, Zhiyi
2023. An adult daughter's identity construction: Membership categorization analysis of daily Chinese-Australian family talk. Journal of Pragmatics 207  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DelPrete, Domenica L.
2021. Troubles talk in mother-daughter interaction: Social bond building or social bond blocking?. Language & Communication 80  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.