Liquid racism in the Greek anti-racist campaign #StopMindBorders
This study examines the opaque reproduction of racism in an online, anti-racist campaign officially aiming to
denounce hate speech and challenge widespread stereotypes concerning migrants. In particular, we investigate the video clips of
the #StopMindBorders campaign launched by the Greek branch of the International Organization for Migration. We
specifically concentrate on the liquid racism attested in these video clips, namely a highly ambivalent form of
racism encouraged in the mass media and usually hard to detect, as it involves multiple interpretations, some of which may not be
assessed as racist (Weaver 2016). The multimodal critical analysis of the
representation of migrants reveals that these video clips tacitly promote migrants’ linguocultural assimilation as a prerequisite
for their acceptance in the host country. In this sense, although the anti-racist campaign under scrutiny attempts to refute
discourses of aggression and mainstream stereotypes against migrants, it ends up naturalizing hate speech and reproducing
assimilative and monoculturalist ideologies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Racism, hate speech, and liquid racism
- 3.The data of the study
- 4.Analytical framework
- 4.1Reisigl and Wodak’s discursive strategies
- 4.2van Leeuwen’s multimodal approach
- 5.Analysis and discussion
- 5.1Discursive strategies in hate speech
- 5.1.1Referential and predicational strategies
- 5.1.1.1Reference/predication for somatization
- 5.1.1.2Reference/predication for culturalization
- 5.1.1.3Reference/predication for social problematization
- 5.1.1.4Reference/predication for collectivization
- 5.1.2Argumentation strategies
- 5.1.3Perspectivation, framing, or discourse representation
- 5.2The visual representation of migrants
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References
Archakis, Argiris, Sofia Lampropoulou, and Villy Tsakona
2018 “
‘I’m Not Racist but I Expect Linguistic Assimilation’: The Concealing Power of Humor in an Anti-racist Campaign.”
Discourse, Context and Media 231: 53–61.


Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony Mc Enery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “
A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.”
Discourse and Society 19(3): 273–306.


Billig, Michael
1995 Banal Nationalism. Los Angeles: Sage.

Blommaert, Jan
2015 “
Commentary: Superdiversity Old and New.”
Language and Communication 441: 82–88.


Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
1998 Debating Diversity: Analyzing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.

Buonanno, Milly
2008 The Age of Television: Experiences and Theories. Bristol: Intellect.

Cohen, Jonathan
1999 “
Favorite Characters of Teenage Viewers of Israeli Serials.”
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 43(3): 327–345.


Cooke, Melanie, and James Simpson
2012 “
Discourses about Linguistic Diversity.” In
The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, edited by
Marilyn Martin-Jones,
Adrian Blackledge, and
Angela Creese, 116–130. London: Routledge.

D. Esdras on the IOM Campaign against Racism in A. Bousdoukou (SKAI 13/7/2017)
Fairclough, Νorman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “
Critical Discourse Analysis.” In
Introduction to Discourse Studies, edited by
Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.

Gogonas, Nikos, and Claudine Kirsch
2018 “
‘In this Country my Children are Learning two of the most Important Languages in Europe’: Ideologies of Language as a Commodity among Greek Migrant Families in Luxembourg.”
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21(4): 426–438.


Hart, Christopher
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal
2000 “
Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In
Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, edited by
Paul V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

KhosraviNik, Majid, Michał Krzyzanowski, and Ruth Wodak
2012 “
Dynamics of Discursive Representations of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the British Press 1996–2006.” In
Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by
Michi Messer,
Renée Schroeder, and
Ruth Wodak, 283–295. Vienna: Springer.


Kirkwood, Steve
2017 “
The Humanization of Refugees: A Discourse Analysis of UK Parliamentary Debates on the European Refugee ‘Crisis’.”
Journal of Community and Social Psychology 27(2): 115–125.


Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
2012 How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.

Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
2013 “
Personalizing Crime and Crime-fighting in Factual Television: An Analysis of Social Actors and Transitivity in Language and Images.”
Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 356–372.


May, Stephen
2017 “
National and Ethnic Minorities: Language Rights and Recognition.” In
The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language, edited by
Suresh Canagarajah, 149–167. London: Routledge.


Moore, Kerry, Paul Mason, and Justin Lewis
2008 “
Images of Islam in the UK: The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000–2008.” Cardiff: Cardiff University.
[URL]
O’Brien, Gerald V.
2003 “
Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States.”
Metaphor and Symbol 18(1): 33–47.


Paulston, Christina Bratt
1980 Bilingual Education: Theories and Issues. Massachusetts: Newbury House.

Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.

Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
2009 “
The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.”
Controversia 6(2): 45–77.

Santa Ana, Otto
1999 “
‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.”
Discourse and Society 10(2): 191–224.


van Dijk, Teun A.
1991 Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.

van Dijk, Teun A.
1992 “
Discourse and the Denial of Racism.”
Discourse and Society 3(1): 87–118.


van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “
Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.”
Japanese Discourse 1(1): 17–27.

van Dijk, Teun A.
2008 Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Weaver, Simon
2011 “
Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G.”
European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(3): 249–264.


Weaver, Simon
2016 The Rhetoric of Racist Humor: US, UK and Global Race Joking. London: Routledge.


Wodak, Ruth
2001 “
The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by
Ruth Wodak, and
Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.

Wolfson, Nicholas
1997 Hate Speech, Sex Speech, Free Speech. London: Praeger.

Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Archakis, Argiris
2022.
Tracing racism in antiracist narrative texts online.
Ethnic and Racial Studies 45:7
► pp. 1261 ff.

Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.