Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourses of aggression in Greek digitally-mediated communication
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Ioannis E. Saridakis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2] 2020
► pp. 232–261

Liquid racism in the Greek anti-racist campaign #StopMindBorders

ORCID logo | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
ORCID logo | University of Patras
ORCID logo | University of Patras
This study examines the opaque reproduction of racism in an online, anti-racist campaign officially aiming to denounce hate speech and challenge widespread stereotypes concerning migrants. In particular, we investigate the video clips of the #StopMindBorders campaign launched by the Greek branch of the International Organization for Migration. We specifically concentrate on the liquid racism attested in these video clips, namely a highly ambivalent form of racism encouraged in the mass media and usually hard to detect, as it involves multiple interpretations, some of which may not be assessed as racist (Weaver 2016). The multimodal critical analysis of the representation of migrants reveals that these video clips tacitly promote migrants’ linguocultural assimilation as a prerequisite for their acceptance in the host country. In this sense, although the anti-racist campaign under scrutiny attempts to refute discourses of aggression and mainstream stereotypes against migrants, it ends up naturalizing hate speech and reproducing assimilative and monoculturalist ideologies.
Keywords: liquid racism, anti-racist discourse, hate speech, stereotypes, assimilation, monoculturalism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Racism, hate speech, and liquid racism
  • 3.The data of the study
  • 4.Analytical framework
    • 4.1Reisigl and Wodak’s discursive strategies
    • 4.2van Leeuwen’s multimodal approach
  • 5.Analysis and discussion
    • 5.1Discursive strategies in hate speech
      • 5.1.1Referential and predicational strategies
        • 5.1.1.1Reference/predication for somatization
        • 5.1.1.2Reference/predication for culturalization
        • 5.1.1.3Reference/predication for social problematization
        • 5.1.1.4Reference/predication for collectivization
      • 5.1.2Argumentation strategies
      • 5.1.3Perspectivation, framing, or discourse representation
    • 5.2The visual representation of migrants
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00036.tsa
References (41)
References
Archakis, Argiris, Sofia Lampropoulou, and Villy Tsakona. 2018. “‘I’m Not Racist but I Expect Linguistic Assimilation’: The Concealing Power of Humor in an Anti-racist Campaign.” Discourse, Context and Media 231: 53–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony Mc Enery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2011. “The Stability of the Televisual Character: A Corpus Stylistic Case Study.” In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, edited by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2015. “Commentary: Superdiversity Old and New.” Language and Communication 441: 82–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren. 1998. Debating Diversity: Analyzing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buonanno, Milly. 2008. The Age of Television: Experiences and Theories. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan. 1999. “Favorite Characters of Teenage Viewers of Israeli Serials.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 43(3): 327–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Melanie, and James Simpson. 2012. “Discourses about Linguistic Diversity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, edited by Marilyn Martin-Jones, Adrian Blackledge, and Angela Creese, 116–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
D. Esdras on the IOM Campaign against Racism in A. Bousdoukou (SKAI 13/7/2017). 2017. [URL]
Fairclough, Νorman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Introduction to Discourse Studies, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gogonas, Nikos, and Claudine Kirsch. 2018. “‘In this Country my Children are Learning two of the most Important Languages in Europe’: Ideologies of Language as a Commodity among Greek Migrant Families in Luxembourg.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21(4): 426–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, edited by Paul V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, Michał Krzyzanowski, and Ruth Wodak. 2012. “Dynamics of Discursive Representations of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the British Press 1996–2006.” In Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Michi Messer, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 283–295. Vienna: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, Steve. 2017. “The Humanization of Refugees: A Discourse Analysis of UK Parliamentary Debates on the European Refugee ‘Crisis’.” Journal of Community and Social Psychology 27(2): 115–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2017. “Introduction: Discourses of Hate and Radicalism in Action.” In Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Spaces and Genres, edited by Monika Kopytowska, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Personalizing Crime and Crime-fighting in Factual Television: An Analysis of Social Actors and Transitivity in Language and Images.” Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 356–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Stephen. 2017. “National and Ethnic Minorities: Language Rights and Recognition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language, edited by Suresh Canagarajah, 149–167. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Kerry, Paul Mason, and Justin Lewis. 2008. “Images of Islam in the UK: The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000–2008.” Cardiff: Cardiff University. [URL]
O’Brien, Gerald V. 2003. “Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States.” Metaphor and Symbol 18(1): 33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paulston, Christina Bratt. 1980. Bilingual Education: Theories and Issues. Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Petrovic, Jelena. 2017. “Conditional Support for Territorial Migrations in Serbian National Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(2): 205–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi (eds). 2011. Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.” Controversia 6(2): 45–77.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1999. “‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse and Society 10(2): 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992. “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse and Society 3(1): 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1(1): 17–27.Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Simon. 2011. “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(3): 249–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The Rhetoric of Racist Humor: US, UK and Global Race Joking. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nicholas. 1997. Hate Speech, Sex Speech, Free Speech. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Allayarova, Nilufar, Djavlonbek Kadirov, Jayne Krisjanous & Micael-Lee Johnstone
2024. Liquid consumption and Islam: The Continual Drift Adjustment (CDA) framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing 15:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2024. Chapter 1. Antiracist and racist discourse as antagonistic and overlapping. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Karachaliou, Rania
2024. Excluding the migrant Other via resistance and inclusion. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Karachaliou, Rania, Vasia Tsami, Alexis Lazanas & Argiris Archakis
2024. Chapter 2. Racist discourses of discrimination and assimilation in an antiracist corpus. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Sapountzis, Antonis & Evangelia Zarmakoupi
2024. Chapter 4. What culture?. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Stamou, Anastasia G. & Konstantina Katrana
2024. Chapter 6. Migrant voices in ‘antiracist’ video clips in Greece. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Gómez-Camacho, Alejandro, Coral I. Hunt-Gómez, Francisco Núñez-Roman & Adrián Neubauer Esteban
2023. “Not all motherfuckers are MENA, but most MENA are motherfuckers”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:2 ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Lampropoulou, Sofia, Paul Cooper, Elizabeth Pye & Megan Griffiths
2023. ‘It came from China; it’s a Chinese virus’. Journal of Language and Discrimination 7:1 DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris
2023. Review of van Dijk (2021): Antiracist Discourse in Brazil: From Abolition to Affirmative Action. Journal of Language and Politics 22:1 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris
2024. Chapter 3. Normalizing assimilation in antiracist (con)texts and (re)producing liquid racism. In Exploring the Ambivalence of Liquid Racism [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 341], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Archakis, Argiris
2022. Tracing racism in antiracist narrative texts online. Ethnic and Racial Studies 45:7 ► pp. 1261 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.