“An equal right to comment”
Metapragmatic negotiation of (im)politeness norms in a confrontational Greek YouTube polylogue discussing online public
female nudity
This paper analyses a snapshot of a conflictive Greek YouTube polylogue dealing with the issue of public online
female nudity and the norms pertaining to both the act itself and its verbal critique. The said polylogue contains a markedly high
proportion of lay (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness evaluations (
Locher and Watts
2005). By quantifying and critically analyzing key lexical impoliteness (
Culpeper
2011) and metapragmatic markers contained in the evaluations, I identify the ways in which the norms of online verbal
behaviour are discursively negotiated amongst the polylogue participants, focusing especially on the arguments and justifications
underlying the suggested norms. It is found that, firstly, the notions of (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness emerge as open to
fierce, yet heavily argument-supported discursive dispute; secondly, sexualized slang functions both as an object of critique and
as an extremely versatile rhetorical instrument serving metapragmatic argumentation; and, thirdly, online
(im)politeness/(in)appropriateness is construed not as a superficial matter of netiquette, but as a deeply ethical and
political-ideological controversy, especially regarding speech liberty and political correctness.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Relational work and the metapragmatics of (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness
- 2.2First-order (im)politeness evaluations in online communication
- 3.The video and the accompanying polylogue: An initial description
- 4.Verbal reactions to the video protagonists’ act of nudity
- 4.1Greek male participants addressing or referring to the female video protagonist
- 4.1.1Terms referring to the woman as a whole person
- 4.1.2Terms denoting the woman’s body or body parts
- 4.2General remarks
- 5.Metapragmatic commentary in the C&R polylogue
- 5.1Negotiating the general (medium-independent) norms of addressing a woman baring herself in public
- 5.2Negotiating the medium-specific norms of addressing a woman baring herself in public
- 6.Summary and conclusion
- 6.1Summary of metapragmatic argumentation in the C&R polylogue
- 6.2Concluding remarks: Lay definitions of politeness
- 7.Epilogue
- Notes
-
References
References (56)
References
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, Anna. 2008. “Το Mόρφημα θεο- στην Eλληνική [The Morpheme theo- in Greek].” In Γλώσσης Χάριν – Τόμος αφιερωμένος από τον Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας στον καθηγητή Γεώργιο Μπαμπινιώτη [For Language’s Sake: A Volume Dedicated by the Department of Linguistics to Professor Georgios Babiniotis], ed. by Amalia Mozer, Ekaterini Bakakou-Orfanou, Christoforos Charalambakis, and Despina Chila-Markopoulou, 99–113. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Angouri, Jo, and Tseliga, Theodora. 2010. “‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in Two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 57–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 2005. “The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 225–280. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chovanec, Jan. 2015. “Participant Roles and Embedded Interactions in Online Sports Broadcasts.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. by Marta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 67–95. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christopoulou, Katerina. 2016. Μια λεξικολογική προσέγγιση στο περιθωριακό λεξιλόγιο της Νέας Ελληνικής. [A lexicological approach to the slang vocabulary of Modern Greek]. PhD Thesis, University of Patras.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christopoulou, Κaterina, and Giorgos J. Xydopoulos. 2014. “Issues d’équivalence en Grec et en Anglais Argotique: les cas de ‘malákas’, ‘ghamó’ et ‘fuck’. [Issues of Equivalence in Greek and English Slang: The Case of ‘malákas’, ‘ghamó’ and ‘fuck’.]” Argotica 1 (3): 45–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester, UK & Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2010. “A Genre Approach to Impoliteness in a Spanish Television Talk Show: Evidence from Corpus Analysis, Questionnaires and Focus Groups.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4): 689–723. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavriilidou, Zoe. 2014. “Intensifying Prefixes in Greek.” In Selected Papers of the 11th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Rhodes, 26–29 September 2013, ed. by G. Kotzoglou, K. Nikolou, E. Karantzola, K. Frantzi, I. Galantomos, M. Georgalidou, V. Kourti-Kazoullis, C. Papadopoulou, and E. Vlachou, 468–478. Rhodes: University of the Aegean.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ginsburg, Judith. 2005. Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, Sage L. 2007. “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 742–759. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graham, Sage L. 2019. “Interaction and Conflict in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 310–328. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research 31: 295–317. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “When is an Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 7–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herring, Susan C., Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen. 2013. “Introduction to the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–32. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. “‘Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments.” Discourse and Society 121: 123–141. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jane, Emma A. 2014. “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 28 (4): 558–570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jane, Emma A. 2017. Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, Elizabeth. 2017. “‘Let them Know that Men Did this’: Medusa, Rape and Female Rivalry in Contemporary Film and Women’s Writing.” In Bad Girls and Transgressive Women in Popular Television, Fiction, and Film, ed. by Julie A. Chappell, and Mallory Young, 183–208. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kádár, Dániel. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kakridis, Ioannis Th. 1986. Ελληνική Μυθολογία: Οι Θεοί. [Greek Mythology: Gods]. Athens: Ekdotiki Athinon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karaian, Lara. 2013. “Policing ‘Sexting’: Responsibilization, Respectability and Sexual Subjectivity in Child Protection/Crime Prevention Responses to Teenagers’ Digital Sexual Expression.” Theoretical Criminology 18 (3): 282–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levine, Étan. 2009. Marital Relations in Ancient Judaism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A. 2010. Power and Politeness in Action. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A. 2015. “Interpersonal Pragmatics and its Link to (Im)politeness Research.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 5–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield. 2008. Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2578–2593. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mills, Sara. 2017. English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2010. Impoliteness in Japanese BBS Interactions: Observations from Message Exchanges in two Online Communities. Journal of Politeness Research 61: 33–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, Sharon. 2004. ““Tough Enough”: Female Friendship and Heroism in Xena and Buffy
.” In Action Chicks: New Images of Tough Women in Popular Culture, ed. by Sherrie A. Inness, 231–256. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, Bertrand. 1930. The Conquest of Happiness. London: George Allen and Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Savvidou, Paraskevi. 2012. “Μετριασμός και Επίταση με τη Χρήση των Μορφημάτων ψιλο- και θεο-: Ανάλυση σε Σώματα Κειμένων. [Mitigation and Intensification via the Use of the Morphemes psilo- and theo-: A Corpus-Based Analysis.]” In Selected Papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics, 1–4 September 2011, Komotini, ed. by Zoe Gavriilidou, Angeliki Efthymiou, Evangelia Thomadaki, and Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis, 1092–1099. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria. 1992. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria. 2015. “Conceptualizing Politeness in Greek: Evidence from Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 25–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria. 2019. “Conflict, Disagreement and (Im)politeness.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 176–195. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, Maria, and Spiridoula Bella. 2019. “Twitter, Politeness, Self-Presentation.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 341–365. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sutherland, Kate. 2003. “From Jailbird to Jailbait: Age of Consent Laws and the Construction of Teenage Sexualities.” William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law 9 (3): 131–349.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, Graeme. 2010. Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wallace, Diana. 2000. Sisters and Rivals in British Women’s Fiction, 1914–39. Hampshire: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard J. 2005. “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo Vadis?.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, xi-xlvii. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 2005. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werkhofer, Konrad T. 2005. “Traditional and Modern Views: The Social Constitution and Power of Politeness.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 155–199. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Heitmayer, Maxi & Robin Schimmelpfennig
2024.
Netiquette as Digital Social Norms.
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 40:13
► pp. 3334 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sagredos, Christos & Evelin Nikolova
2022.
‘Slut I hate you’.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1
► pp. 169 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.