Linguistic analysis of the interpersonal patterning of threatening communication is a means of uncovering the attitudes,
ideological orientation, and hostile intentions of perpetrators of violence in terrorist discourse (Gales 2010, 2011). Corpus analysis focused on attitudinal meaning also offers a
diagnostic for characterizing the personal and relational identities (Bednarek 2010) manifest in
such texts. This paper explores discursive patterns of authorial identity in terrorist communication in a set of post-9/11 terrorist public
statements made by former al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden. It draws on the Appraisal framework (Martin
and White 2005), a model of evaluative language developed within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), to investigate the
interpersonal component in this dataset. Specifically, patterns of attitude provide evidence of relational and actional attitude,
and personal and relational identities. Negative judgement was found to characterize the encoded attitude in terms of (i)
construing aggression and conflicting moral values (e.g., social sanction underpinning a perceived personal duty) and (ii) enacting
the author’s aggressive and aloof identity, and violent actional attitude.
1999 “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(3): 193–209.
2003 “Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, edited by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior, 83–96. London and New York: Routledge.
2006Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum.
2010 “Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interpersonal Meaning, Identity and Bonding in Popular Culture.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 237–266. London: Continuum.
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2006Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2006 “Identity in Applied Linguistics.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 34–49. London and New York: Continuum.
Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
2020 “Correlation, Collocation and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse and Society 31(4): 351–373.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614.
2017The Language of Fear: Communicating Fear in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cotler, Irwin, and David Grossman
2009 “State-sanctioned Incitement to Genocide: The Responsibility to Prevent.” In “‘Hate Speech’ and Incitement to Violence” Workshop Series-Columbia University School of Law. [URL]
Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison Johnson, and David Wright
2017An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
2001Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.
Farkas, Johan, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer
2018 “Platform Antagonism: Racist Discourses on Fake Muslim Facebook Pages.” Critical Discourse Studies.
1991Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
2010 “Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.
2011 “Identifying Interpersonal Stance in Threatening Discourse: An Appraisal Analysis.” Discourse Studies 13(1): 27–46.
2013 “Linguistic Analysis of Disputed Meanings: Threat.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Carol Chapelle. London: Blackwell.
2015 “Threatening Stances: A Corpus Analysis of Realized vs. Non-Realized Threats.” Language and Law 2(2): 1–25. [URL]
2018 “Freedom of Expression, Hate Speech, and Incitement to Terrorism and Genocide: Resonances and Tensions.” In Incitement to Terrorism, edited by Anne Bayefsky and Laurie Blank, 1–14. The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff.
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw, and Susan Hunston
2016 “Corpora and Beyond – Investigating Evaluation in Discourse: Introduction to the Special Issue on Corpus Approaches to Evaluation.” Corpora 11(2): 131–141.
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir
2010 “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
1973Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Arnold.
1978Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.
1979 “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure, and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions.” In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, edited by David Allerton, Edward Carney and David Holdcroft, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1985Language, Context, and Text. Deakin University: Deakin University Press.
2010 “The Meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not.” In Appliable Linguistics, edited by Ahmar Mahboob and Naomi Knight, 267–305. London and New York: Continuum.
2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29.
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
1988Social Semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.
1993 “Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London and New York: Pinter.
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter White
1994Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project – Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
2009 “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2019 “Rhetorical Strategies of Political Persuasion: The Play of Irrealis and Realis Meaning in Re/Aligning Readers in Newspapers Editorials.” Text and Talk 39(5).
2019War and its Ideologies: A Social-Semiotic Theory and Description. Singapore: Springer.
Lutz, James, and Brenda Lutz
2008Global Terrorism. London and New York: Routledge.
2014 “Corpus Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Michael Burke, 378–392. London/New York: Routledge.
2019 “Cultural and Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Terrorism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism, edited by Erica Chenoweth, Richard English, Andreas Gofas and Stathis Kalyvas, 177–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, James, and David Rose
2003Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. New York: Continuum.
Martin, James, and Peter White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 41–56. [URL]
2004Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London: Continuum.
2008Forensic Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Omoniyi, Tope, and Goodith White
2006Sociolinguistics of Identity. London and New York: Continuum.
1995 “The Revolutionary Terrorism of Peru’s Shining Path.” In Terrorism in Context, edited by Martha Crenshaw, 249–308. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
2011 “Linguistic Contributions to the Analysis of Hate Language.” International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 1(1): 27–52. [URL]
2017 “A Crusade Gone Wrong: George W. Bush and the War on Terror in Asia.” International Studies 521(1–4) 12–26.
Reynolds, Katherine, John Turner, and Alexander Haslam
2000 “When are we Better than them and they Worse than us? A Closer Look at Social Discrimination in Positive and Negative Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1): 64–80.
2013 “Why Coercion is Wrong When it’s Wrong.” Australian Journal of Philosophy 911: 63–82.
1992Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
2006 “Toward a Common Profile of Religious Terrorism: Some Psychosocial Determinants of Christian and Islamic Terrorists.” Police Practice and Research 7(4): 275–292.
2012 “Systemic Functional Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Gee and Michael Handford, 21–34. London and New York: Routledge.
2010 “Linguistics and Terrorism Cases.” In Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 558–575. London: Routledge.
2004 “From Words to Action: Exploring the Relationship between a Group’s Value References and its Likelihood of Engaging in Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 271: 409–437.
2018How Radicalization to Terrorism Occurs in the United States: What Research Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice Tells Us. Washington: National Institute of Justice. [URL]
Smith, Sharon, and Roger Shuy
2002 “Forensic Psycholinguistics: Using Language Analysis for Identifying and Assessing Offenders.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (April): 16–21. [URL].
2009 “A Linguistic Turn of Terrorism Studies.” DIIS Working Paper 2009:01. [URL]
2006 “Constructing Languages, Constructing National Identities.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 50–71. London and New York: Continuum.
1988 “From ‘Right’ to ‘Needs’: Official Discourse and the ‘Welfarization’ of Race.” In Discourse and Discrimination, edited by Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson and Teun van Dijk, 176–205. Michigan: Wayne State University Press.
1997 “Language and Identity.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tajfel, Henry, and John Turner
1979 “An Integrated Theory of Inter-Group Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William Austin and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
2010 “Imagining Communities: A Multifunctional Approach to Identity Management in Texts.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 163–194. London and New York: Continuum.
1997 “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 101–118.
2001 “Critique Discourses and Ideology in Newspaper Reports: A Discourse Analysis of the South African Press Reports on the 1998 SADC’s Military Intervention in Lesotho.” Discourse and Society 12(3): 347–370.
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 169–191.
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles
2002Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York and London: The Guildford Press.
Turner, James, and Michael Gelles
2003Threat Assessment: A Risk Management Approach. New York: Haworth Press.
Van Langenhove, Luk
2017 “Varieties of Moral Orders and the Dual Structure of Society: A Perspective from Positioning Theory.” Frontiers in Sociology 2(9): online.
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. New York, NY: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
2012Ideology in Language Use: Guidelines for Empirical Research. UK: Cambridge University Press.
2003Verbal Behavior and Personality Assessment. In The Psychological Assessment of Political leaders with Profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton, edited by Jerrold Post, 137–152. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
2003 “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23(2): 259–284. [URL]
2022. Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff.
2023. Language as evidence. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 29:2 ► pp. 230 ff.
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2023. The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society► pp. 1 ff.
Zappavigna, Michele & Shoshana Dreyfus
2022. “In these pandemic times”: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100595 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.