Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 10:2 (2022) ► pp.315–350

Identity, ideology and threatening communication

An investigation of patterns of attitude in terrorist discourse

ORCID logo | University of New South Wales, Australia
ORCID logo | University of New South Wales, Australia
Linguistic analysis of the interpersonal patterning of threatening communication is a means of uncovering the attitudes, ideological orientation, and hostile intentions of perpetrators of violence in terrorist discourse (Gales 2010, 2011). Corpus analysis focused on attitudinal meaning also offers a diagnostic for characterizing the personal and relational identities (Bednarek 2010) manifest in such texts. This paper explores discursive patterns of authorial identity in terrorist communication in a set of post-9/11 terrorist public statements made by former al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden. It draws on the Appraisal framework (Martin and White 2005), a model of evaluative language developed within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), to investigate the interpersonal component in this dataset. Specifically, patterns of attitude provide evidence of relational and actional attitude, and personal and relational identities. Negative judgement was found to characterize the encoded attitude in terms of (i) construing aggression and conflicting moral values (e.g., social sanction underpinning a perceived personal duty) and (ii) enacting the author’s aggressive and aloof identity, and violent actional attitude.
Keywords: aggression, attitudinal meaning, conflict, identity, terrorist discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Attitudinal stance and identity
  • 2.Attitudinal patterning of identity
  • 3.Theoretical framework: The appraisal framework
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Procedure of analysis
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Encoded attitude in the dataset
    • 5.2Judgement of participants and characteristic personal and relational identity
  • 6.Conclusion and further research
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00058.eta
References (98)
References
Afsaruddin, Asma. 2020. “Jihad.” Encyclopædia Britannica. [URL]
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe. 1998. “Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool”. In Identity in Talk, edited by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 1–14. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. 2019. AntConc Corpus Analysis Toolkit (Version 3.5.8.0) [Computer Software], Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey. 2018. “A Corpus-driven Comparison of English and French Islamist Extremist Texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23(3): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1999. “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(3): 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 2003. “Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, edited by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior, 83–96. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Language Pattern and Attitude.” Functions of Language 16(2): 165–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interpersonal Meaning, Identity and Bonding in Popular Culture.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 237–266. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, David. 2006. “Identity in Applied Linguistics.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 34–49. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery. 2020. “Correlation, Collocation and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse and Society 31(4): 351–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Fear in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotler, Irwin, and David Grossman. 2009. “State-sanctioned Incitement to Genocide: The Responsibility to Prevent.” In “‘Hate Speech’ and Incitement to Violence” Workshop Series-Columbia University School of Law. [URL]
Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison Johnson, and David Wright. 2017. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry. 2017. “Linguistic Impoliteness and Religiously Aggravated Hate Crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Farkas, Johan, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer. 2018. “Platform Antagonism: Racist Discourses on Fake Muslim Facebook Pages.” Critical Discourse Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gales, Tammy. 2010. “Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Identifying Interpersonal Stance in Threatening Discourse: An Appraisal Analysis.” Discourse Studies 13(1): 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Linguistic Analysis of Disputed Meanings: Threat.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Carol Chapelle. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Threatening Stances: A Corpus Analysis of Realized vs. Non-Realized Threats.” Language and Law 2(2): 1–25. [URL]
Gordon, Gregory. 2018. “Freedom of Expression, Hate Speech, and Incitement to Terrorism and Genocide: Resonances and Tensions.” In Incitement to Terrorism, edited by Anne Bayefsky and Laurie Blank, 1–14. The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw, and Susan Hunston. 2016. “Corpora and Beyond – Investigating Evaluation in Discourse: Introduction to the Special Issue on Corpus Approaches to Evaluation.” Corpora 11(2): 131–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir. 2010. “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure, and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions.” In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, edited by David Allerton, Edward Carney and David Holdcroft, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text. Deakin University: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2010. “The Meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not.” In Appliable Linguistics, edited by Ahmar Mahboob and Naomi Knight, 267–305. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1993. “Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter White. 1994. Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project – Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janicki, Karol. 2017. “What is Conflict? What is Aggression? Are these Challenging Questions?” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 156–166. [URL]. DOI logo
Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. “Stance, Style, and the Linguistic Individual.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kniffka, Hannes. 2007. Working in Language and Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leets, Laura, and Giles Howard. 1997. “Words as Weapon: When Do They Wound? Investigations of Harmful Speech.” Human Communication Research 24(2): 260–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 1992. “Interpersonal Meaning in Discourse: Value Orientations.” In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, edited by Martin Davies and Louise Ravelli, 82–104. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Resources for Attitudinal Meaning: Evaluative Orientations in Text Semantics.” Functions of Language, 5(1): 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Feifei, and Susan Hood. 2019. “Rhetorical Strategies of Political Persuasion: The Play of Irrealis and Realis Meaning in Re/Aligning Readers in Newspapers Editorials.” Text and Talk 39(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle. 2019. War and its Ideologies: A Social-Semiotic Theory and Description. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutz, James, and Brenda Lutz. 2008. Global Terrorism. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela. 2014. “Corpus Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Michael Burke, 378–392. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malešević, Siniša. 2019. “Cultural and Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Terrorism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism, edited by Erica Chenoweth, Richard English, Andreas Gofas and Stathis Kalyvas, 177–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo, José, and Francisco Yus. 2013. “Towards a Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Taxonomy of Insults.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Clark, and Sophia Mosalenko. 2016. “Fear and Anger Elicited by Terrorist Attack: The Power of Jujitsu Politics.” White Paper on Assessing and Anticipating Threats to US Security Interests (March). [URL]
McMenamin, Gerald. 2010. “Forensic Stylistics: Theory and Practice of Forensic Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 487–507. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meloy, Reid. 2001. “Communicated Threats and Violence toward Public and Private Targets: Discerning Differences among Those Who Stalk and Attack.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 46(5): 1211–1213. [URL]
Meloy, Reid, David James, Frank Farnham, Paul Mullen, Michele Pathé, Brian Darnley, and Lulu Preston. 2004. “A Research Review of Public Figure Threats, Approaches, Attacks, and Assassinations in the United States.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 491: 1086–1093. [URL]. DOI logo
Millar, Neil, and Susan Hunston. 2015. “Adjectives, Communities, and Taxonomies of Evaluative Meaning.” Functions of Language 22(3): 297–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Flagg. 2015. The Audacious Ascetic. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Muschalik, Julia. 2018. Threatening in English: A Mixed Method Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2015. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 41–56. [URL]
Olsson, John. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. Forensic Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Omoniyi, Tope, and Goodith White. 2006. Sociolinguistics of Identity. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Palmer, David. 1995. “The Revolutionary Terrorism of Peru’s Shining Path.” In Terrorism in Context, edited by Martha Crenshaw, 249–308. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Prideaux, Gary. 2011. “Linguistic Contributions to the Analysis of Hate Language.” International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 1(1): 27–52. [URL]
Ray, Saumyajit. 2017. “A Crusade Gone Wrong: George W. Bush and the War on Terror in Asia.” International Studies 521(1–4) 12–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Katherine, John Turner, and Alexander Haslam. 2000. “When are we Better than them and they Worse than us? A Closer Look at Social Discrimination in Positive and Negative Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1): 64–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Benjamin. 2013. “Why Coercion is Wrong When it’s Wrong.” Australian Journal of Philosophy 911: 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schbley, Ayla. 2006. “Toward a Common Profile of Religious Terrorism: Some Psychosocial Determinants of Christian and Islamic Terrorists.” Police Practice and Research 7(4): 275–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary. 2012. “Systemic Functional Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Gee and Michael Handford, 21–34. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger. 2010. “Linguistics and Terrorism Cases.” In Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 558–575. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Allison. 2004. “From Words to Action: Exploring the Relationship between a Group’s Value References and its Likelihood of Engaging in Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 271: 409–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. How Radicalization to Terrorism Occurs in the United States: What Research Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice Tells Us. Washington: National Institute of Justice. [URL]
Smith, Sharon, and Roger Shuy. 2002. “Forensic Psycholinguistics: Using Language Analysis for Identifying and Assessing Offenders.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (April): 16–21. [URL]. DOI logo
Straun, Jørgen. 2009. “A Linguistic Turn of Terrorism Studies.” DIIS Working Paper 2009:01. [URL]
Suleiman, Yasir. 2006. “Constructing Languages, Constructing National Identities.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 50–71. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sykes, Mary. 1988. “From ‘Right’ to ‘Needs’: Official Discourse and the ‘Welfarization’ of Race.” In Discourse and Discrimination, edited by Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson and Teun van Dijk, 176–205. Michigan: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1997. “Language and Identity.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henry, and John Turner. 1979. “An Integrated Theory of Inter-Group Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William Austin and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tann, Ken. 2010. “Imagining Communities: A Multifunctional Approach to Identity Management in Texts.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 163–194. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thetela, Puleng. 1997. “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Critique Discourses and Ideology in Newspaper Reports: A Discourse Analysis of the South African Press Reports on the 1998 SADC’s Military Intervention in Lesotho.” Discourse and Society 12(3): 347–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Laura Alba-Jues. (Eds.). 2014. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2008. “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles. 2002. Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York and London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Turner, James, and Michael Gelles. 2003. Threat Assessment: A Risk Management Approach. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Van Langenhove, Luk. 2017. “Varieties of Moral Orders and the Dual Structure of Society: A Perspective from Positioning Theory.” Frontiers in Sociology 2(9): online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. London: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use: Guidelines for Empirical Research. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Walter. 2003. Verbal Behavior and Personality Assessment. In The Psychological Assessment of Political leaders with Profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton, edited by Jerrold Post, 137–152. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2003. “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23(2): 259–284. [URL]
. 2006. “Evaluative Semantics and Ideological Positioning in Journalistic Discourse.” In Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies, edited by Inger Lassen, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Appraisal Theory.” The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. USA: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, David. 2005. The Terrorism Reader. London and New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, and Kay O’Halloran. 2017. “Violent Extremism and Iconisation: Commanding Good and Forbidding Evil?” Critical Discourse Studies 14(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Etaywe, Awni, Kate Macfarlane & Mamoun Alazab
2024. A cyberterrorist behind the keyboard. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Zeng, Lei & Xinyu Zhu
2024. Constructing cultural identities through new media: a multimodal appraisal analysis of Chinese web-based ink and wash cartoons. Semiotica 2024:259 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, Katie Jane Patterson, Manuel Moyano & Irene González
2023. They were not radical, even when they committed that. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2023. The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Giménez García, Roser & Sheila Queralt
2023. Pragmatic linguistic analysis of the videos by terrorists of the Barcelona and Cambrils attacks. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 96 ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Giménez García, Roser & Sheila Queralt
2023. Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability? How Forensic Linguistics Can Contribute to Terrorism Trials. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2022. “I Am Proud to Be a Traitor”. Pragmatics and Society 13:3 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2022. Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Language as evidence. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 29:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Discursive pragmatics of justification in terrorist threat texts: Victim-blaming, denying, discrediting, legitimating, manipulating, and retaliation. Discourse & Society DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Conceptual Burstiness in Sociolinguistic Profiling of Radical-Criminal Communications: Corpus Method-Assisted Meaning Extraction for Investigative Leads. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Unmasking Malicious Stance Indicators and Attitudinal Priming: An ‘Evaluative Textbite’ Approach to Identity Attacks in Violent Extremist Discourse. Corpus Pragmatics DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Compassion as appraisal, performative identity and moral affiliation. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 6:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Shoshana Dreyfus
2022. “In these pandemic times”: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100595 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.