Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 10:2 (2022) ► pp.315–350

Identity, ideology and threatening communication

An investigation of patterns of attitude in terrorist discourse

ORCID logo | University of New South Wales , Australia
ORCID logo | University of New South Wales , Australia

Linguistic analysis of the interpersonal patterning of threatening communication is a means of uncovering the attitudes, ideological orientation, and hostile intentions of perpetrators of violence in terrorist discourse (Gales 2010, 2011). Corpus analysis focused on attitudinal meaning also offers a diagnostic for characterizing the personal and relational identities (Bednarek 2010) manifest in such texts. This paper explores discursive patterns of authorial identity in terrorist communication in a set of post-9/11 terrorist public statements made by former al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden. It draws on the Appraisal framework (Martin and White 2005), a model of evaluative language developed within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), to investigate the interpersonal component in this dataset. Specifically, patterns of attitude provide evidence of relational and actional attitude, and personal and relational identities. Negative judgement was found to characterize the encoded attitude in terms of (i) construing aggression and conflicting moral values (e.g., social sanction underpinning a perceived personal duty) and (ii) enacting the author’s aggressive and aloof identity, and violent actional attitude.

Keywords: aggression, attitudinal meaning, conflict, identity, terrorist discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Attitudinal stance and identity
  • 2.Attitudinal patterning of identity
  • 3.Theoretical framework: The appraisal framework
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Procedure of analysis
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Encoded attitude in the dataset
    • 5.2Judgement of participants and characteristic personal and relational identity
  • 6.Conclusion and further research
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00058.eta
References
Afsaruddin, Asma
2020 “Jihad.” Encyclopædia Britannica. [URL]
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
1998 “Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool”. In Identity in Talk, edited by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 1–14. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence
2019 AntConc Corpus Analysis Toolkit (Version 3.5.8.0) [Computer Software], Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey
2018 “A Corpus-driven Comparison of English and French Islamist Extremist Texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23(3): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert
1999 “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(3): 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
2003 “Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, edited by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior, 83–96. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006 Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2009 “Language Pattern and Attitude.” Functions of Language 16(2): 165–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interpersonal Meaning, Identity and Bonding in Popular Culture.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 237–266. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
2006 Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, David
2006 “Identity in Applied Linguistics.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 34–49. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
2020 “Correlation, Collocation and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse and Society 31(4): 351–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2017 The Language of Fear: Communicating Fear in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotler, Irwin, and David Grossman
2009 “State-sanctioned Incitement to Genocide: The Responsibility to Prevent.” In “‘Hate Speech’ and Incitement to Violence” Workshop Series-Columbia University School of Law. [URL]
Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison Johnson, and David Wright
2017 An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2001 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry
2017 “Linguistic Impoliteness and Religiously Aggravated Hate Crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade
1997 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Farkas, Johan, Jannick Schou, and Christina Neumayer
2018 “Platform Antagonism: Racist Discourses on Fake Muslim Facebook Pages.” Critical Discourse Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1991 Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gales, Tammy
2010 “Ideologies of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening Communications”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
2011 “Identifying Interpersonal Stance in Threatening Discourse: An Appraisal Analysis.” Discourse Studies 13(1): 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Linguistic Analysis of Disputed Meanings: Threat.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited by Carol Chapelle. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015 “Threatening Stances: A Corpus Analysis of Realized vs. Non-Realized Threats.” Language and Law 2(2): 1–25. [URL]
Gordon, Gregory
2018 “Freedom of Expression, Hate Speech, and Incitement to Terrorism and Genocide: Resonances and Tensions.” In Incitement to Terrorism, edited by Anne Bayefsky and Laurie Blank, 1–14. The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Gozdz-Roszkowski, Stanislaw, and Susan Hunston
2016 “Corpora and Beyond – Investigating Evaluation in Discourse: Introduction to the Special Issue on Corpus Approaches to Evaluation.” Corpora 11(2): 131–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir
2010 “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert and Gardner Lindzey, 797–852. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1973 Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1979 “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure, and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions.” In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, edited by David Allerton, Edward Carney and David Holdcroft, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1985 Language, Context, and Text. Deakin University: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
2010 “The Meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not.” In Appliable Linguistics, edited by Ahmar Mahboob and Naomi Knight, 267–305. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993 “Evaluation and Ideology in Scientific Writing.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohsen Ghadessy, 57–73. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter White
1994 Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project – Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009 “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janicki, Karol
2017 “What is Conflict? What is Aggression? Are these Challenging Questions?” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 156–166. [URL]. DOI logo
Johnstone, Barbara
2009 “Stance, Style, and the Linguistic Individual.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kniffka, Hannes
2007 Working in Language and Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leets, Laura, and Giles Howard
1997 “Words as Weapon: When Do They Wound? Investigations of Harmful Speech.” Human Communication Research 24(2): 260–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay
1992 “Interpersonal Meaning in Discourse: Value Orientations.” In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, edited by Martin Davies and Louise Ravelli, 82–104. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1998 “Resources for Attitudinal Meaning: Evaluative Orientations in Text Semantics.” Functions of Language, 5(1): 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Feifei, and Susan Hood
2019 “Rhetorical Strategies of Political Persuasion: The Play of Irrealis and Realis Meaning in Re/Aligning Readers in Newspapers Editorials.” Text and Talk 39(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2019 War and its Ideologies: A Social-Semiotic Theory and Description. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lutz, James, and Brenda Lutz
2008 Global Terrorism. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela
2014 “Corpus Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Michael Burke, 378–392. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malešević, Siniša
2019 “Cultural and Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Terrorism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism, edited by Erica Chenoweth, Richard English, Andreas Gofas and Stathis Kalyvas, 177–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and Peter White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo, José, and Francisco Yus
2013 “Towards a Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Taxonomy of Insults.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Clark, and Sophia Mosalenko
2016 “Fear and Anger Elicited by Terrorist Attack: The Power of Jujitsu Politics.” White Paper on Assessing and Anticipating Threats to US Security Interests (March). [URL]
McMenamin, Gerald
2010 “Forensic Stylistics: Theory and Practice of Forensic Stylistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 487–507. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meloy, Reid
2001 “Communicated Threats and Violence toward Public and Private Targets: Discerning Differences among Those Who Stalk and Attack.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 46(5): 1211–1213. [URL]
Meloy, Reid, David James, Frank Farnham, Paul Mullen, Michele Pathé, Brian Darnley, and Lulu Preston
2004 “A Research Review of Public Figure Threats, Approaches, Attacks, and Assassinations in the United States.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 491: 1086–1093. [URL]. DOI logo
Millar, Neil, and Susan Hunston
2015 “Adjectives, Communities, and Taxonomies of Evaluative Meaning.” Functions of Language 22(3): 297–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Flagg
2015 The Audacious Ascetic. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Muschalik, Julia
2018 Threatening in English: A Mixed Method Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 41–56. [URL]
Olsson, John
2004 Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Forensic Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Omoniyi, Tope, and Goodith White
2006 Sociolinguistics of Identity. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Palmer, David
1995 “The Revolutionary Terrorism of Peru’s Shining Path.” In Terrorism in Context, edited by Martha Crenshaw, 249–308. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Prideaux, Gary
2011 “Linguistic Contributions to the Analysis of Hate Language.” International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse 1(1): 27–52. [URL]
Ray, Saumyajit
2017 “A Crusade Gone Wrong: George W. Bush and the War on Terror in Asia.” International Studies 521(1–4) 12–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Katherine, John Turner, and Alexander Haslam
2000 “When are we Better than them and they Worse than us? A Closer Look at Social Discrimination in Positive and Negative Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1): 64–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Benjamin
2013 “Why Coercion is Wrong When it’s Wrong.” Australian Journal of Philosophy 911: 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schbley, Ayla
2006 “Toward a Common Profile of Religious Terrorism: Some Psychosocial Determinants of Christian and Islamic Terrorists.” Police Practice and Research 7(4): 275–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary
2012 “Systemic Functional Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Gee and Michael Handford, 21–34. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger
2010 “Linguistics and Terrorism Cases.” In Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 558–575. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Allison
2004 “From Words to Action: Exploring the Relationship between a Group’s Value References and its Likelihood of Engaging in Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 271: 409–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 How Radicalization to Terrorism Occurs in the United States: What Research Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice Tells Us. Washington: National Institute of Justice. [URL]
Smith, Sharon, and Roger Shuy
2002 “Forensic Psycholinguistics: Using Language Analysis for Identifying and Assessing Offenders.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (April): 16–21. [URL]. DOI logo
Straun, Jørgen
2009 “A Linguistic Turn of Terrorism Studies.” DIIS Working Paper 2009:01. [URL]
Suleiman, Yasir
2006 “Constructing Languages, Constructing National Identities.” In Sociolinguistics of Identity, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Goodith White, 50–71. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sykes, Mary
1988 “From ‘Right’ to ‘Needs’: Official Discourse and the ‘Welfarization’ of Race.” In Discourse and Discrimination, edited by Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson and Teun van Dijk, 176–205. Michigan: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, Andrée
1997 “Language and Identity.” In The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henry, and John Turner
1979 “An Integrated Theory of Inter-Group Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William Austin and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tann, Ken
2010 “Imagining Communities: A Multifunctional Approach to Identity Management in Texts.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, edited by Monika Bednarek and James Martin, 163–194. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thetela, Puleng
1997 “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Critique Discourses and Ideology in Newspaper Reports: A Discourse Analysis of the South African Press Reports on the 1998 SADC’s Military Intervention in Lesotho.” Discourse and Society 12(3): 347–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Laura Alba-Jues
(Eds.) 2014 Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles
2002 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York and London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Turner, James, and Michael Gelles
2003 Threat Assessment: A Risk Management Approach. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Van Langenhove, Luk
2017 “Varieties of Moral Orders and the Dual Structure of Society: A Perspective from Positioning Theory.” Frontiers in Sociology 2(9): online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. London: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
2012 Ideology in Language Use: Guidelines for Empirical Research. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Walter
2003 Verbal Behavior and Personality Assessment. In The Psychological Assessment of Political leaders with Profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton, edited by Jerrold Post, 137–152. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
White, Peter
2003 “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23(2): 259–284. [URL]
2006 “Evaluative Semantics and Ideological Positioning in Journalistic Discourse.” In Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: Ten Critical Studies, edited by Inger Lassen, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Appraisal Theory.” The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. USA: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, David
2005 The Terrorism Reader. London and New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, and Kay O’Halloran
2017 “Violent Extremism and Iconisation: Commanding Good and Forbidding Evil?” Critical Discourse Studies 14(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2022. “I Am Proud to Be a Traitor”. Pragmatics and Society 13:3 ► pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, Katie Jane Patterson, Manuel Moyano & Irene González
2023. They were not radical, even when they committed that. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2022. Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Language as evidence. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 29:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2023. The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Giménez García, Roser & Sheila Queralt
2023. Pragmatic linguistic analysis of the videos by terrorists of the Barcelona and Cambrils attacks. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 96 ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Giménez García, Roser & Sheila Queralt
2024. Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability? How Forensic Linguistics Can Contribute to Terrorism Trials. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 37:2 ► pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Shoshana Dreyfus
2022. “In these pandemic times”: The role of temporal meanings in ambient affiliation about COVID-19 on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100595 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.