Cover not available
Article published In:
Young researchers in action
Edited by Angeliki Tzanne
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1] 2022
► pp. 85–110

Patterns of conflict speech and young adult feminist identity construction on Tumblr

| University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Interactions on social media platforms are becoming increasingly relevant from an identity construction perspective. Conflict speech, in particular, is a form of interaction that is especially common in online spaces and constructs identity through polarization, strengthening the in-group while excluding the out-group. The young adult feminist identity has established a strong presence in online spaces, specifically the microblogging platform Tumblr. This study seeks to analyze the role of conflict speech in young adult feminist identity construction through focusing on recontextualization of comments and name-calling strategies. Within this analysis, it is possible to determine the importance of conflict speech as it strengthens the collective feminist identity while allowing those in the in-group to exclude and dismiss conflictual comments stemming from those in the out-group.
Keywords: conflict speech, feminist identity, Tumblr, online interaction, polarization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Social media
  • 3.Identity construction
  • 4.Conflict speech
  • 5.Methods
    • 5.1Data collection
    • 5.2Theoretical tools for data analysis
  • 6.Results and discussion
    • 6.1Recontextualization of comments
    • 6.2Name-calling
  • 7.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00061.cos
References (27)
References
Attenborough, Frederick. 2014. “Rape is Rape (Except when it’s Not)”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2): 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2): 226–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calder-Dawe, Octavia and Nicola Gavey. 2017. “Authentic Feminist? Authenticity and Feminist Identity in Teenage Feminists’ Talk.” British Journal of Social Psychology 56(4): 782–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. “It’s all in the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation.” Hypatia 13(3): 62–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Impoliteness Strategies.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, edited by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 421–445. Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Fina, Anna. 2006. “Group Identity, Narrative and Self Representations.” In Discourse and Identity, edited by Anna de Fina, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg, 351–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 120–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan. 2016. “‘Real Men don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiwani, Yasmin, and John E. Richardson. 2006. “Discourse, Ethnicity and Racism.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun A. Van Dijk, 241–262. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Junco, Reynol, and Arthur W. Chickering. 2010. “Civil Discourse in the Age of Social Media.” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience 15(4): 12–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Martina. 2013. “Say, Be like, Quote (Unquote), and the Air-quotes: Interactive Quotatives and their Multimodal Implications.” English Today 29(4): 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Eun-Ju. 2007. “Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public-self-awareness, and Perceived Argument Quality.” Journal of Communication 57(2): 385–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Looft, Ruxandra. 2017. “#girlgaze: Photography, Fourth Wave Feminism, and Social Media Advocacy.” Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 31(6): 892–902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller Dobs, Abby, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2013. “Impoliteness in Polylogal Interaction: Accounting for Face-threat Witnesses’ Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 531: 122–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Abigail. 2016. “Disturbing Hegemonic Discourse: Nonbinary Gender and Sexual Orientation Labeling on Tumblr.” Social Media + Society 2(3): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, Loreen N., Tina A. Coffelt, Eileen Berlin Ray, Jill Rudd, Renee Botta, George Ray, and Jenifer E. Kopfman. 2008. “‘I’m all for Equal Rights, but don’t Call me a Feminist”: Identity Dilemmas in Young Adults’ Discursive Representations of Being a Feminist.” Women’s Studies in Communication 31(1): 104–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann W. Unger, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S. D., R. Spears, and T. Postmes. 1995. “A Social Model of Deindividuation Phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology 6(1): 161–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze, Quentin J., and Randall L. Bytwerk. 2012. “Plausible Quotations and Reverse Credibility in Online Vernacular Communities.” ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 69(2): 216–234. [URL]
Wargo, Jon M. 2017. “‘Every Selfie Tells a Story…’: LGBTQ Youth Lifestreams and New Media Narratives as Connective Identity Texts.” New Media and Society 19(4): 560–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1987. Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk . Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. “Enacting Identity in Microblogging through Ambient Affiliation.” Discourse and Communication 81: 209–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Deng, Yue, Zheng Chen, Changyang He, Zhicong Lu & Bo Li
2024. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Krikela, Sofia
2022. Disagreements in a feminist digital safe space. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Sagredos, Christos & Evelin Nikolova
2022. ‘Slut I hate you’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.