Article published in:
Thematic issue: New perspectives on conflict[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2] 2021
► pp. 297–323
“The people watching at home”
An analysis of political disagreement in a public inquiry event
Tom W. Underwood | University of Warwick , UK
Jo Angouri | University of Warwick , UK
This paper explores disagreement practice in political discourse, specifically in the under explored public inquiry communicative event and more specifically in the select-committee hearing. We revisit earlier work on theorising disagreement to expand our understanding of its contextual nature, particularly in relation to the making of ideology.Public inquiries combine the characteristics of professional meetings with characteristics of political discourse. They are typified by hybridised and ambiguous role expectations which participants negotiate in and through (potentially competing) practices in doing the ideological work demanded by the policy process. In this context, disagreement emerges as key to the performance of the interactants’ situated and explicit/semi-permanent roles as professional politicians.By applying Critical Interactional Sociolinguistic analysis within a wider frame of audience design, we demonstrate the importance of the ideological role of disagreement to the policy process. We argue that further attention needs to be given to the policy talk in meso-level political events, such as the public inquiry, which connect the ideological (macro) political domains of human activity with the (micro) here and now of talk. We close the paper with directions for further research.
Keywords: disagreement, ideology, Critical Interactional Sociolinguistics, audience, policy process, meso-space, political discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The UK Parliament select committee hearing
- 3.Critical Interactional Sociolinguistics and policy analysis
- 3.1Critical Interactional Sociolinguistics (CIS)
- 3.2Application to policy events
- 3.3Disagreement
- 3.3.1A CIS approach to disagreement
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Data analysis
- 5.1Excerpt A: “I don’t think you can um get away with that minister”
- 5.2Excerpt B: “You’re quite right you know”
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 05 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00068.und
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00068.und
References
Angouri, Jo
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Sandra Harris
Bousfield, Derek
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
Buttny, Richard
Demasi, Mirko A.
2016 “Debating the European Union: Dynamics of Argumentation in Political Debates.” Loughborough University. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/thesis/Debating_the_European_Union_dynamics_of_argumentation_in_political_debates/9480254
Ehrlich, Susan, and Alice F. Freed
Ekström, Mats
Fairclough, Norman
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
Gumperz, John Joseph, and Jenny Cook-Gumperz
Hajer, Maarten A.
Hanks, William F.
Haugh, Michael
Hutchby, Ian
Institute for Government
2018 Public Inquiries 21 May. Accessed June 2020. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/public-inquiries
2020 Select Committees 19 May. Accessed June 2020. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/select-committees
Kreis, Ramona
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
Laville, Sandra
2019 “Six UK Fashion Retailers Fail to Cotton on to Sustainability.” The Guardian. Accessed 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2019/jan/31/six-uk-fashion-retailers-fail-to-cotton-on-to-sustainability-environment
Livesey, Sharon M.
Marra, Meredith
Marshall, Joe
2020 Select Committees. Accessed 2021 https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/select-committees
Murphy, James
Myers, Greg
Rampton, Ben
Rydin, Yvonne
Sacks, Harvey
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric
Smith, Sophie
2018 “MPs Launch Inquiry into Fashion Industry’s Environmental Impact.” The Telegraph. Accessed 2019 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/06/22/mps-launch-inquiry-fashion-industrys-environmental-impact/
Smithers, Rebecca
2018 “MPs to Examine Environmental Footprint of UK Fashion Industry.” The Guardian. Accessed 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2018/jun/22/mps-to-examine-environmental-footprint-of-uk-fashion-industry
Tannen, Deborah, and Christina Kakavá
UK Government
n.d. How Government Works. Accessed June 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works
UK Parliament
2018 MPs to Measure-up the Fashion Industry with Event at the V&A. November. Accessed June 2020. https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/news-parliament-2017/sustainable-fashion-vanda-evidence-17-19/
2018 parliamentlive.tv: Environmental Audit Committee. 18 December. https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/ccea76b1-55ee-4cff-94a8-146852285d1e
2019 Sustainability of the Fashion Industry Inquiry: Publications. Accessed 2019 https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/inquiries/parliament-2017/sustainability-of-the-fashion-industry-17-19/publications/
n.d. www.parliament.uk. Accessed June 2020. https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/