Love thy ‘populist’
The democratization potential of scandals involving transgression of accepted speech and populist logic
This article aims to deepen our understanding of scandals involving both transgression of accepted speech and
populist logic by analysing the origins, development, and outcome of a 2018 Czech media controversy. The scandal erupted when a
public service radio station was accused of airing pornographic content. It escalated when the accuser added a xenophobic,
homophobic and nativist commentary to his complaint. By analysing each party’s arguments, the contested and silenced ideas, and
the fantasmatic dimension, I demonstrate how each actor contributed to the escalation of the conflict and facilitated a shift in
accepted public conduct. I propose to view such scandals as attempts to break hegemonic silence that reveal the lack of acceptance
of a new norm, in this case homosexuality. I conclude that such scandals can support dialogue and reduce the polarization of
society if dissenting views are taken into consideration and divisive language avoided by all sides.
Article outline
- 1.Introducing the ‘porn on the Vltava’ controversy
- 2.Questions of denomination
- 3.Methodology: Data and theoretical framework
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Main goals, theoretical frameworks and procedure of analysis
- 3.2.1Silence and silencing
- 3.2.2The fantasmatic dimension
- 4.Results: Key actors, contested notions and types of silencing
- 4.1The antagonistic groups
- 4.2Vulgar as erotic, obscene, offensive or taboo?
- 4.3Concealing homosexuality
- 4.4The fantasmatic and populist logics
- 4.5Closure of the controversy
- 5.Concluding remarks: Channelling discontent in times of polarization
- Notes
-
References