Intersectionality and the gendered discussion around Muslim Canadian politicians on Twitter
This study investigates users’ gendered attitudes towards Muslim Canadian politicians on Twitter with regard to
intersectionality. Its purpose is to understand the tone and intersectional dimensions of Twitter users’ responses to Muslim
Canadian politicians and the gendered responses to them. Therefore, we extracted all the available Twitter replies to 11 Muslim
men and women politicians. Using a mixed method approach, we investigated how the public engages with Muslim politicians by
focusing on intersectional characteristics. Results show that Muslim politicians are not directly under attack because of their
religion unless they engage in public discussion of Islamic issues. Overall, both men and women politicians received higher
numbers of negative replies than positive ones. Women received more personal replies while men received more professional ones.
For both men and women politicians, personal attributes such as nationality, gender, and religion were used as a means for
discriminating against them. However, we found that replies to women were more likely to be stereotypical and refer to
characteristics of their identity and their appearance. The digital analysis shows, however, that men politicians were more
trolled than their women counterparts and that the quality of attacks differed as well.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Who are Muslim Canadian politicians?
- 2.1Trolling politicians on social media
- 2.2Reasons for online assaults and their effects
- 2.3The role of politicians’ behavior
- 2.4How online harassment affects politicians
- 2.5The role of political position and research timing
- 2.6Other important factors
- 3.Method
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1The tone
- 4.2Professional and personal replies
- 4.3Race, religion, nationality and gender
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References