References
Al-Dayel, Nadia, Andrew Mumford, and Kevin Bales
2022 “Not Yet Dead: The Establishment and Regulation of Slavery by the Islamic State.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 45 (11): 929–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ali, Mah-Rukh
2015 “ISIS and Propaganda: How ISIS Exploits Women.” Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 10 (11). [URL]
Bates, David
2023 “ ‘The jobs all go to foreigners’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Labour Party’s ‘Left-Wing’ Case for Immigration Controls.” Critical Discourse Studies 20 (2): 183–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolechów, Bartosz
2022 “The Islamic State’s Worldview as a Radical Terror Management Device.” Studia Politologiczne 631: 61–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boukala, Salomi
2016 “Rethinking Topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon Seeking and Argumentation in Greek Media Discourses on ‘Islamist Terrorism’.” Discourse Studies 18 (3): 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braet, A. C.
2005 “The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme.” Argumentation 19 (1): 65–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frissen, Thomas, and Leen d’Haenens
2017 “Legitimizing the Caliphate and its Politics: Moral Disengagement Rhetoric in Dabiq.” In Authoritarian and Populist Influences in the New Media, edited by Sai Felicia Krishna-Hensel, 138–164. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galloway, Chris
2016 “Media Jihad: What PR can Learn in Islamic State’s Public Relations Masterclass.” Public Relations Review 42 (4): 582–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jean
1998 “Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam.” Argumentation 121: 267–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ihnen, Constanza, and John E. Richardson
2011 “On Combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Haroro J.
2016 “An Analysis of Islamic State’s Dabiq Magazine.” Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 458–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Learning from ISIS’s Virtual Propaganda War for Western Muslims: A Comparison of Inspire and Dabiq. IOS Press.” [URL]
Jacoby, Tim
2019 “Islam and the Islamic State’s Magazine, Dabiq.” Politics and Religion 12 (1): 32–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
1996Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 1 edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2 edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3 edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kugle, Scott Siraj al-Haqq
2010Homosexuality in Islam: Critical Reflection on Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Muslims. Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Ladd, Brian K., and Jean Goodwin
2022 “Extreme Arguments: Anwar al-Awlaki’s Radicalizing Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 2001: 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Luke Walker, and Anina Kinzel
2017 “The Role of Discourse Analysis in Terrorism Studies: Comparing Inspire and Dabiq.” In Terrorists’ Use of the Internet, edited by Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri, 158–169. IOS Press Ebooks.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Stuart, Sara Giro Correia, and Amy-Louise Watkin
2019 “Regulating Terrorist Content on Social Media: Automation and the Rule of Law.” International Journal of Law in Context 15 (2): 183–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMinimy, Kayla, Carol K. Winkler, Ayse Deniz Lokmanoglu, and Monerah Almahmoud
2021 “Censoring Extremism: Influence of Online Restriction on Official Media Products of ISIS.” Terrorism and Political Violence 35 (4): 971–987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagata, Michael, Ali Abbas, Scott Atran, Bill Braniff, Andrew Bringuel, Muayyad al-Chalabi, Sarah Canna, and Jocelyne Cesari
2014 “Preface.” In Multi-method Assessment of ISIL, edited by Hriar Cabayan, and Sarah Canna. [URL]. DOI logo
Rasoulikolamaki, Sahar, and Surinderpal Kaur
2021 “How ISIS Represented Enemies as Ineffectual in Dabiq: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Communication 15 (6): 650–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 “The Representational Strategies of Lionization and Victimization in ISIS’s Online Magazine, Dabiq.” Terrorism and Political Violence 35 (5): 1161–1180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmid, Alex P.
2015 “Challenging the Narrative of the ‘Islamic State’.” The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism 51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spier, Troy E.
2018 “Extremist Propaganda and Qur’anic Scripture: A ‘Radical’ Corpus-Based Study of the Dabiq.” Discourse & Society 29 (5): 553–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strnad, Vladislav, and Nik Hynek
2020 “ISIS’s Hybrid Identity: A Triangulated Analysis of the Dabiq Narrative.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 82–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Clarion Project
2014 Accessed May, 2016. [URL]
van der Krogt, Christopher J.
2022 “Incitement: Anwar al-Awlaki’s Western Jihad.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 33 (3): 326–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas Neil
1997Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wozniak, Jesse, Joshua Woods, and Quentin King
2018 “Chaos and Civilization: The Organizational Impression Management of the Islamic State in Dabiq Magazine.” Social Science Quarterly. [URL]
Žagar, Igor
2010 “ Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco
2019 “The Brexit Referendum: How Trade and Immigration in the Discourses of the Official Campaigns Have Legitimised a Toxic (Inter)national Logic.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 403–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar