References (63)
References
Adrián, Thays. 2013. “Divide y Vencerás: La Antonimia Como Estrategia Ideológica de Polarización En El Discurso de Hugo Chávez Frías.” Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Del Discurso 13 (1): 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Mervat. 2021. “Polarization and Negative-Other ‘China’ Presentation in US President Trump’s COVID-19 Tweets: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Cairo Studies in English (2): 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Ghazzi, Omar. 2021. “We Will Be Great Again: Historical Victimhood in Populist Discourse.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 24 (1): 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, Alexandra, and Irma Chumaceiro. 2010. “¡Con La Iglesia Hemos Topado…! Aspectos de Una Interacción Polémica Entre El Presidente Chávez y El Cardenal Urosa Savino.” ALED 10 (1): 35–63.Google Scholar
Arcimavičienė, Liudmila. 2019. “Self and Other Metaphors as Facilitating Features of Populist Style in Diplomatic Discourse: A Case Study of Obama and Putin’s Speeches.” In Populist Discourse: International Perspectives, edited by Marcia Macaulay, 89–124. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne H., and Maria Constantinou. 2014. “Language of Cyber-Politics: ‘Imaging/Imagining’ Communities.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 10 (2): 213–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen. 2017. “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review.” Metaphor and Symbol 32 (2): 118–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana. 2013. “Los Pronombres Personales En La Dinámica Del Discurso Político.” Estudios Del Discurso En América Latina. Homenaje a Ana María Harvey, no. 1984: 167–191.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Gwen, and Judith E. Rosenbaum, eds. 2020. Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2019. “Emotion in Politics: Affective-Discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse and Society 30 (1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd edn. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chun, Christian W. 2016. “Exploring Neoliberal Language, Discourses and Identities.” The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, edited by Siân Preece, 558–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coesemans, Roel, and Barbara De Cock. 2017. “Self-Reference by Politicians on Twitter: Strategies to Adapt to 140 Characters.” Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conger, Kate. 2023. “So What Do We Call Twitter Now Anyway?The New York Times, 2023. [URL]
Connett, Ricardo. 2022. “La Construcción de Las Identidades Políticas En El Discurso Populista de Hugo Chávez . Un Análisis Basado En Los Estudios Del Discurso Asistido Por Corpus.” Ñemitỹrã. Revista Multilingüe de Lengua, Sociedad y Educación 4 (3): 83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darics, Erika, and Veronika Koller. 2019. “Social Actors ‘to Go’: An Analytical Toolkit to Explore Agency in Business Discourse and Communication.” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 82 (2): 214–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, edited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, 357–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, William, and Mark Hamilton. 2022. “A Framework for Understanding Polarizing Language.” The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion, edited by Jeanne Fahnestock, and Randy Allen Harris, 207–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdogan-Ozturk, Yasemin, and Hale Isik-Guler. 2020. “Discourses of Exclusion on Twitter in the Turkish Context: #ülkemdesuriyeliistemiyorum (#idontwantsyriansinmycountry).” Discourse, Context and Media 361: 100400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evolvi, Giulia. 2017. “#Islamexit: Inter-Group Antagonism on Twitter.” Information Communication and Society 22 (3): 386–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, eds. 2021. Discursive Approaches to Socio-Political Polarization and Conflict. Preprint. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2018. “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadavanij, Savitri. 2020. “Contentious Polities and Political Polarization in Thailand: Post-Thaksin Reflections.” Discourse and Society 31 (1): 44–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate, ed. 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2011. “Moving beyond Metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, edited by Christopher Hart, 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Cognitive Linguistic Critical Discourse Studies: Connecting Language and Image.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner, 187–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurst, Luke. 2023. “‘More Toxic, Less Valuable, Less Useful’: Twitter’s Year of Transformation to X under Elon Musk.” Euronews Next, 2023. [URL]
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubícek, Vojtech Kovár, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 1 (1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2008. “Corporate Brands as Socio-Cognitive Representations.” In Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems, edited by Gitte Kristiansen, and René Dirven, 389–418. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “How to Analyse Collective Identity in Discourse – Textual and Contextual Parameters.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5 (2): 19–38.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Applying Social Cognition Research to Critical Discourse Studies: The Case of Collective Identities.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 147–66. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krendel, Alexandra, Mark McGlashan, and Veronika Koller. 2022. “The Representation of Gendered Social Actors Across Five Manosphere Communities on Reddit.” Corpora 17 (2): 1–25. [URL]
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [URL]. DOI logo
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Tao, and Yifan Zhu. 2020. “How Does China Appraise Self and Others? A Corpus-Based Analysis of Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 31 (2): 153–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic. [URL]
Over, Harriet, and Cade McCall. 2018. “Becoming Us and Them: Social Learning and Intergroup Bias.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 12 (4): e12384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterssen, Silvia. 2022. “Ideological Polarisation in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 14 (1): 63–85. [URL]
Peterssen, Silvia, and Augusto Soares da Silva. 2023. “Polarising Metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis.” Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterssen, Silvia, and Augusto Soares da Silva. In press. Polarising metaphors in far-right populist tweets: A comparative cross-linguistic study. In Metaphor in Social-political Contexts: Critical, Socio-Cognitive Approaches, edited by Manuela Romano. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Romano, Manuela, and Maria Dolores Porto, eds. 2016. Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]. DOI logo
Salamurović, Aleksandra. 2020. “Metonymy and the Conceptualisation of Nation in Political Discourse.” Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8 (1): 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2017. “Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Barbara Dancygier, 463–476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2011. Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca, and Manuela Romano. 2017. “The Conceptualisation of Austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, edited by Farzad Sharifian, 345–368. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2015. “Twitter: Design, Discourse, and the Implications of Public Text.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 239–255. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries, eds. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [URL]. DOI logo
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi, eds. 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge. [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 26–43. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio, and Adriana Amado. 2017. “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information Communication and Society 20 (9): 1330–1346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wirth-Koliba, Victoria. 2016. “The Diverse and Dynamic World of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 8 (1): 23–37. [URL]
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar