Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults
The aim of this paper is to explain the use of insults from a relevance-theoretic perspective. To that end, our analysis takes into consideration four variables that, we believe, play a major role in how insults are produced an interpreted: (a) the conventional or innovative nature of the insult; (b) the underlying intentionality (to offend, to praise or to establish/maintain social bonding; (c) the in/correct interpretation of the insult, and (d) the addressee’s reaction or lack thereof. The combination of these variables generates a twenty four case taxonomy that can account for and describe the use of insults in any given (cross)-cultural context. The proposed taxonomy will be here described and exemplified.
Keywords: relevance theory, intentionality, insults, cognitive effects, cross-cultural, offence, inference, social bonding, phatic communication, misunderstanding, praise
Published online: 28 June 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I.M. Poppi
Dynel, Marta & Fabio I. M. Poppi
Fakharzadeh, Mehrnoosh & Hajar Dadkhah
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga
Meibauer, Jörg
Nodoushan, Mohammad Ali Salmani
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
Rousseau, Elise & Stephane J Baele
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
Stenström, Anna-Brita
Yus, Francisco
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.