The present paper discusses issues of language aggression, conflict and identity, and of emotional communication and conflict. In particular, it explores different positionings of deviant identity as projected by a number of juvenile delinquents through the display of moral indignation (Ochs et al. 1989; Günthner 1995), at moments of crisis and conflictual relationships between them. Moral indignation is expressed through the co-occurrence of a number of linguistic and discursive devices, such as hypothetical examples and personal analogies (Günthner 1995; Kakavá 2002), prosodic features, implicit or explicit moral judgments (Günthner 1995), or non-literal threats. These devices are employed in interaction in order to construct opposing moral versions of identities. The paper argues for a tight interweaving between moral indignation, affect, identity indexing, and moral positioning. It further argues that displays of indignation are powerful interactional devices of conflict management and control of the moral and social order and of social relationships.
Adelswärd, Viveka, Jana Holsanova, and Victoria Wibeck
2002.“Virtual Talk as a Communicative Resource: Explorations in the Field of Gene Technology.” Sprachtheorie und Germanistische Linguistik 12(1):3-26.
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
2010“‘You Have No Idea What You Are Talking About’: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two Online Fora.”Journal of Politeness Research 6(1):57-82.
Atkinson, Maxwell J., and John C. Heritage
(eds.)1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, edited by Michael E. Holquist, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael E. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2007. “Enjeux sociaux de la sociolinguistique: Pour une sociolinguistique critique.”Langage et Société 121/1221:305-318.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2008“All of the above: New Coalitions in Sociocultural Linguistics”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):401-431.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth
2012“Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Anssi Peräkylä, 113-146. Oxford: Oxford University.
Corsaro, William A., and Douglas W. Maynard
1996“Format Tying in Discussion and Argumentation among Italian and American Children.” In Social Interaction, Social Context and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, edited by Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Jiansheng Guo, 157-174. Mahwah NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Drew, Paul
1998“Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3-4):295-325.
Edwards, Derek
2000“Extreme Case Formulations: Softeners, Investment, and Doing Nonliteral.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4):347-373.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2001“Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations.”Journal of Pragmatics 331:1881-1900.
Goffman, Erving
1978“Response Cries.”Language 54(4):787-815.
Goodwin, Charles
2006“Retrospective and Prospective Orientation in the Construction of Argumentative Moves.” Text & Talk 26(4/5):443-461.
Goodwin, Marjorie H
1990He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
2000“Emotion within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 239-257. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Anssi Peräkylä, 16-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Günthner, Susanne
1995“Exemplary Stories: The Cooperative Construction of Indignation.”Versus70/71:147-175.
Günthner, Susanne
1996“The Prosodic Contextualization of Moral Work: An Analysis of Reproaches in ‘Why’-formats.” In Prosody in Conversation, edited by Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 271-302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[1998] 1999. “Polyphony and the ‘Layering of Voices’ in Reported Dialogues: An Analysis of the Use of Prosodic Devices in Everyday Reported Speech.”Journal of Pragmatics 311:685-708.
Held, Gudrun
1989“On the Role of Maximization in Verbal Politeness.”Multilingua 7(4):167-206.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter
2011“Threats: Power, Family Mealtimes, and Social Influence. British Journal of Social Psychology 501:99-120.
Hetherington, Kevin
1998Expressions of Identity: Spaces, Performance, Politics. London: Sage.
Hirschon, Renée
1992“Greek Adults Verbal Play, or How to Train for Caution.”Journal of Modern Greek Studies 101:35-56.
Holt, Elizabeth
1996“Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3):219-245.
Holt, Elizabeth
2000“Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4):425-454.
1996“Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, edited by Michael Silverstein and Greg Urban, 131-159. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009“Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra Jaffe, 3-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise J. Phillips
2002.Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Kakavá, Christina
1993 “Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Conversations and Classroom Discourse.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Kakavá, Christina
2002“Opposition in Modern Greek Discourse: Cultural and Contextual Constraints.”Journal of Pragmatics 341:1537-1568.
Leung, Santoi
2002“Conflict Talk: A Discourse Analytical Perspective.”Teachers College Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 2(2):1-19. [URL]
Locher, Miriam
2004Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Martin, James R
2003“Introduction.”Text 23(2):171-181.
Maynard, Douglas W
1985“How Children Start Arguments.”Language in Society 141:1–30.
1990Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi Schieffelin
1989“Language Has a Heart.”Text 9(1):7-25.
Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith, and Carolyn Taylor
1989.“Detective Stories at Dinnertime: Problem-Solving Through Co-Narration.” Cultural Dynamics 21:238-257.
Pechey, Graham
2007Mikhail Bakhtin. The Word in the World. New York: Routledge.
Peräkylä, Anssi
2012“Epilogue: What Does the Study of Interaction Offer to Emotion Research?” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Anssi Peräkylä, 274-289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
(eds.)2012Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petraki, Eleni
2005“Disagreement and Opposition in Multigenerational Interviews with Greek-Australian Mothers and Daughters.”Text 25(2):269-303.
Pomerantz, Anita
1986“Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.”Human Studies 91:219-229.
1984“Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 131:311-335.
Searle, John R
1975“A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, edited by Keith Gunderson, 344-369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2012“Disagreements, Face and Politeness.”Journal of Pragmatics 441:1554-1564.
Stokoe, Elizabeth
2003“Mothers, Single Women and Sluts: Gender, Morality and Membership Categorization in Neighbour Disputes.”Feminism & Psychology 13(3):317-344.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards
2007“‘Black this, Black that’: Racial Insults and Reported Speech in Neighbour Complaints and Police Interrogations.” Discourse & Society 181:337-372.
Tannen, Deborah
1984Conversational Style. N.J.: Norwood, Ablex.
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsitsipis, Lukas D
2007“Bilingualism, Praxis and Linguistic Description.” In Bilingualism: A Social Approach, edited by Monica Heller, 277-296. London and New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Voloshinov, Vladimir
[1929] 1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Walton, Douglas
2000Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger
2006“Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.”Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2):150-182.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff.
2017. Sounding off or a sounding board? Comments sections of news websites as interactive spaces. In Discours des réseaux sociaux : enjeux publics, politiques et médiatiques [Culture & Communication, ], ► pp. 197 ff.
Warren, Amber N. & Jessica Nina Lester
2020. How teachers deliberate policy: Taking a stance on third grade reading legislation in online language teacher education. Linguistics and Education 57 ► pp. 100813 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.