Several philosophy of language scholars have recently argued that the intention to deceive is not part of a well-defined concept of lying. So-called bald-faced lies, i.e., asserting what is false while speaker and hearer both understand that the speaker does not believe what s/he asserts are provided as evidence. In contrast to these proposals, it is pointed out in this article that lying is necessarily connected to an intention to deceive. Consequently, it is argued that so-called bald-faced lies are not proper lies but acts of verbal aggression. Since bald-faced lies attack the face of the addressee and the viability of the Cooperative Principle (Grice 1989a), they are analyzed as insults. Thus, the traditional idea that lying is connected to the intention to deceive is upheld.
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arico, Adam J., and Don Fallis. 2013. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: An Empirical Investigation of the Concept of Lying.”Philosophical Psychology 26(6):790-816.
Bonacchi, Silvia. 2012. “Zu den idiokulturellen und polykulturellen Bedingungen von aggressiven Äußerungen im Vergleich Polnisch-Deutsch-Italienisch.” In Der Mensch und seine Sprachen: Festschrift für Professor Franciszek Grucza, edited by Magdalena Olpinska-Szkielko, Jerzy Zmudzki, Zofia Berdychowska and Sambor Grucza, 1-20. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
Carson, Thomas L. 2010. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chisholm, Roderick M., and Thomas D. Feehan. 1977. “The Intent to Deceive.”The Journal of Philosophy 741:143-159.
Croom, Adam M. 2011. “Slurs.”Language Sciences 331:343-358.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
d’Avis, Franz, and Jörg Meibauer. 2013. “Du Idiot/Din Idiot! Pseudo-vocative Constructions and Insults in German (and Swedish).” In Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, edited by Patrizia Noel and Barbara Sonnenberger, 113-141. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fallis, Don. 2009. “What is Lying?”Journal of Philosophy 1061:29-56.
Fallis, Don. 2011. “Lying and Deception.”Philosopher’s Imprint 101: 1-22.
Fallis, Don. 2013. “Are Bald-Faced Lies Deceptive After All?” (April 12, 2013). Available at [URL]: [URL] or [URL]10.2139/ssrn.2250050
Frankfurt, Harry G. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grice, Paul. 1989a. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, by Paul Grice, 22-40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Grice, Paul. 1989b. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, by Paul Grice, 41-57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Havryliv, Oksana. 2009. Verbale Aggression. Formen und Funktionen am Beispiel des Wienerischen. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
Hilgendorf, Eric. 2008. “Beleidigung – Grundlagen, interdisziplinäre Bezüge und neue Herausforderungen.” Erwägen – Wissen – Ethik 19(4):403-412.
Kertész, András, and Ferenc Kiefer. 2013. “From Thought Experiments to Real Experiments in Pragmatics.” In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, edited by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 53-86. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Klungervik Greenall, Ann Jorid. 2002. “Towards a Socio-cognitive Account of Flouting and Flout-based Meaning.” Phil. Diss., Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.
Labov, William. 1972. “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular by William Labov, 297-353. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning From Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lackey, Jennifer. 2013. “Lies and Deception: An Unhappy Divorce.”Analysis 73(2):236-248.
Langton, Rae, Sally Haslanger, and Luvell Anderson. 2012. “Language and Race.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language, edited by Gillian Russell, and Delia Graff Fara, 753-767. London, New York: Routledge.
Mahon, James Edwin. 2008. “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [URL]
Meibauer, Jörg. 2012. “Pragmatic Evidence, Context, and Story Design. An Essay on Recent Developments in Experimental Pragmatics.”Language Sciences 34-(6):768-776.
Meibauer, Jörg. 2013. “Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie.”Linguistische Berichte 2351:267-292.
Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Mooney, Annabelle. 2004. “Co-operation, Violations and Making Sense.”Journal of Pragmatics 361:899-920.
Neu, Jerome. 2008. Sticks and Stones. The Philosophy of Insults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2007. The Expressive Dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2):165-198.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorensen, Roy. 2007. “Bald-faced Lies! Lying without the Intent to Deceive.”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 881:251-264.
Staffel, Julia. 2011. “Reply to Sorensen, ‘Knowledge-Lies’.”Analysis 71(2):300-302.
Stokke, Andreas. 2013a. “Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading.” Philosophy Compass 8(4):348-359.
Stokke, Andreas. 2013b. “Lying and Asserting.”Journal of Philosophy CX-(1):33-60.
Terjesen, Andrew. 2010. “Is Don Draper a Good Man?” In Mad Men and Philosophy. Nothing is as it Seems, edited by Rod Carveth and James B. South, 154-167. Hoboke, New Jersey: John Wiley.
Williams, Bernard. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Gaszczyk, Grzegorz & Aleksandra Krogulska
2024. Lying by explaining: an experimental study. Synthese 203:3
Bataineh, Rula Fahmi , Ruba F. Bataineh & Lara K. Andraws
2023. How Polite can Impoliteness be? A Jordanian Gendered Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies► pp. 16 ff.
Bozsik, Tamara
2023. A verbális agresszió megnyilvánulási formái politikai tartalmú Facebook-kommentekben. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 10:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Rudnicki, Jakub & Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska
2023. Don’t be deceived: bald-faced lies are deceitful assertions. Synthese 201:6
2023. A Speech-Act Theoretic Analysis of White (Prosocial) Lies. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ], ► pp. 245 ff.
Bączkowska, Anna
2021. “You’re too thick to change the station” – Impoliteness, insults and responses to insults on Twitter. Topics in Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 62 ff.
Bączkowska, Anna
2022. "HOPE YOU HAVE A SHIT BIRTHDAY YOU FAT CUNT”– cognitive strategies, rhetorical figures and linguistic means used in insulting Tweets. Forum Filologiczne Ateneum :1(10)2022 ► pp. 9 ff.
Kneer, Markus
2021. Can a Robot Lie? Exploring the Folk Concept of Lying as Applied to Artificial Agents. Cognitive Science 45:10
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 555 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2021. Humour and (mock) aggression: Distinguishing cyberbullying from roasting. Language & Communication 81 ► pp. 17 ff.
Harris, Daniel W.
2020. Intentionalism and bald-faced lies. Inquiry► pp. 1 ff.
Krstić, Vladimir
2019. Can You Lie Without Intending to Deceive?. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100:2 ► pp. 642 ff.
Krstić, Vladimir
2022. On the connection between lying, asserting, and intending to cause beliefs. Inquiry► pp. 1 ff.
Wiegmann, Alex & Jörg Meibauer
2019. The folk concept of lying. Philosophy Compass 14:8
Bonacchi, Silvia
2018. Verbale Aggression. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 439 ff.
Milić, Ivan
2018. “What Counts as an Insult?”. Acta Analytica 33:4 ► pp. 539 ff.
FALBO, ARIANNA
2017. Analyzing the Wrongfulness of Lying: A Defence of Pluralism. Dialogue 56:3 ► pp. 431 ff.
2016. Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:1
Meibauer, Jörg
2018. The Linguistics of Lying. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 357 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
2019. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 147 ► pp. 17 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.