Article published in:Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres
Edited by Monika Kopytowska
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1] 2015
► pp. 13–40
Saying the unsayable
Denying the Holocaust in media debates in Austria and the UK
After 1945 and the end of WWII, denying the Holocaust became an explicit taboo in most European countries. More specifically, in Austria, denying the Holocaust in public implies legal consequences: the so-called Verbotsgesetz persecutes any public utterances which even insinuate National Socialist ideology (utterances, symbols, songs, images) and the Holocaust denial. Naturally, it remains difficult for the courts to substantiate any accusations and to prove that somebody has actually uttered Holocaust denial if the meanings are only implied, inferred, or alluded to. Thus, in spite of such explicit sanctions, politicians of the far-right have found many coded and implicit discursive-pragmatic practices and devices of denying the Holocaust, even during parliamentary debates and official speeches. In my paper, I compare the “discourses about Holocaust denial” in Austria and the UK, in two case studies: the first one relates to the controversy about some utterances of Barbara Rosenkranz who stood as candidate of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) for election to Austrian Presidency in April 2010. Secondly, I focus on the debates triggered by Nick Griffin from the British extreme right party BNP, in and after his appearance in the prominent BBC 1 weekly show Question Time, in 2009. I apply the Discourse-Historical Approach in CDA for the detailed analysis of such recurring debates and foreground the patterns of a globalised politics of denial.
Keywords: hate speech, topos, right-wing populist rhetoric, taboo, antisemitism, Holocaust denial, far right, implicitness, Discourse Historical Approach
Published online: 02 October 2015
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
De Cillia, Rudolf, and Ruth Wodak
Delanty, Gerard, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones
Engel, Jakob, and Ruth Wodak
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Ana Tominc
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak
2003 “ ‘Furchtbar war der Blutzoll, den Österreich entrichten musste...’. Die Wehrmacht und ihre Soldaten in österreichischen Schulbüchern.” In Wie Geschichte gemacht wird. Zur Konstruktion von Erinnerungen an Wehrmacht und Zweiten Weltkrieg, edited by Hannes Heer, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak, 171–191. Vienna: Czernin.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
Richardson, John E
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
Stögner, Karin, and Ruth Wodak
forthcoming). “‘The Man who Hated Britain’. The Discursive Construction of National Unity against ‘the Jewish Alien’”. Critical Discourse Studies.
2003 “Argumentationstopos als sprachwissenschaftlicher Gegenstand. Für eine Erweiterung linguistischer Methoden bei der Analyse öffentlicher Diskurse.” In Sinnformeln. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern, edited by Susanne Geideck and Wolf-Andreas Liebert, 59–82. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wodak, Ruth, Peter Nowak, Johanna Pelikan, Helmut Gruber, Rudolf de Cillia, and Richard Mitten
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl
Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner
Wodak, Ruth, and John E. Richardson
Cited by 4 other publications
Burke, Shani, Parisa Diba & Georgios A Antonopoulos
Felberg, Tatjana & Ljiljana Šarić
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper & Elena Semino
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.