Cover not available
Article published In:
Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres
Edited by Monika Kopytowska
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1] 2015
► pp. 13–40

Saying the unsayable

Denying the Holocaust in media debates in Austria and the UK

After 1945 and the end of WWII, denying the Holocaust became an explicit taboo in most European countries. More specifically, in Austria, denying the Holocaust in public implies legal consequences: the so-called Verbotsgesetz persecutes any public utterances which even insinuate National Socialist ideology (utterances, symbols, songs, images) and the Holocaust denial. Naturally, it remains difficult for the courts to substantiate any accusations and to prove that somebody has actually uttered Holocaust denial if the meanings are only implied, inferred, or alluded to. Thus, in spite of such explicit sanctions, politicians of the far-right have found many coded and implicit discursive-pragmatic practices and devices of denying the Holocaust, even during parliamentary debates and official speeches. In my paper, I compare the “discourses about Holocaust denial” in Austria and the UK, in two case studies: the first one relates to the controversy about some utterances of Barbara Rosenkranz who stood as candidate of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) for election to Austrian Presidency in April 2010. Secondly, I focus on the debates triggered by Nick Griffin from the British extreme right party BNP, in and after his appearance in the prominent BBC 1 weekly show Question Time, in 2009. I apply the Discourse-Historical Approach in CDA for the detailed analysis of such recurring debates and foreground the patterns of a globalised politics of denial.
Keywords: hate speech, topos, right-wing populist rhetoric, taboo, antisemitism, Holocaust denial, far right, implicitness, Discourse Historical Approach
Published online: 2 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.01wod
References (38)
References
Allport, Gordon. 1979 [1954]. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak. 2014. “‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’ The Greek Success Story and the Rise of the Far Right.” Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benz, Wolfgang. 1995. Realitätsverweigerung als antisemitisches Prinzip: Die Leugnung des Völkermords, In: Wolfgang Benz (ed.) Antisemitismus in Deutschland. Zur Aktualität eines Vorurteils. 121–139. Stuttgart: DTV.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1978. Fascists. A Social Psychological View of the National Front. London: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Boromisza-Habashi, David. 2013. Speaking Hatefully. Philadelphia: Penn. State University Press.Google Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf, and Ruth Wodak (eds.) 2009. Gedenken im „Gedankenjahr“: Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr. Innsbruck: StudienverlagGoogle Scholar
Delanty, Gerard, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones (eds.) 2011. Migration, Identity, and Belonging. Liverpool: LUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel, Jakob, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “Kalkulierte Ambivalenz, „Störungen“ und das „Gedankenjahr“: Die Causen Siegfried Kampl und John Gudenus.” In Gedenken im „Gedankenjahr“: Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr, edited by Rudolf de Cillia, and Ruth Wodak, 79–100. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
. 2013. “‘Calculated Ambivalence’ and Holocaust Denial in Austria”. In Analysing Fascist Discourse. European Fascism in Talk and Text, edited by Ruth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 73–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard. 2011. “Critique, the Discourse-Historical Approach and the Frankfurt School.” Critical Discourse Studies 8(1):1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Ana Tominc. 2012. “Critique and Argumentation: On the Relation between the Discourse-Historical Approach and Pragma-Dialectics.” Journal of Language and Politics 11(1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmachts War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave (transl. from the German version 2003).Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. 2007. Postwar. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kahn, Robert A. 2005. Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1996. Vernünftig argumentieren: Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion. Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Lipstadt, Deborah. 1993. Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Loitfellner, Sabine. 2003. “‘Furchtbar war der Blutzoll, den Österreich entrichten musste...’. Die Wehrmacht und ihre Soldaten in österreichischen Schulbüchern.” In Wie Geschichte gemacht wird. Zur Konstruktion von Erinnerungen an Wehrmacht und Zweiten Weltkrieg, edited by Hannes Heer, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak, 171–191. Vienna: Czernin.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Discourse-historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–12. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2013a. “Ploughing the Same Furrow? Continuity and Change on Britain’s Extreme Right Fringe.” In Rightwing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral, 105–120, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Racial Populism in British Fascist Discourse: The Case of COMBAT and the British National Party (1960-1967).” In Analysing Fascist Discourse. European Fascism in Talk and Text, edited by Ruth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 181–202. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009a. “Recontextualising Fascist Ideologies of the Past: Right-wing Discourses on Employment and Nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 41:251–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. “The Impact of Visual Racism - Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right parties.” Controversia 21:45 -77.Google Scholar
Solomos, John. 2013. “Contemporary Forms of Racist Movements and Mobilization in Britain.” In Rightwing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral, 121–134. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stögner, Karin, and Ruth Wodak. 2014. “Nationale Einheit” und die Konstruktion des “fremden Juden”, Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 241: 131–160.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). “‘The Man who Hated Britain’. The Discursive Construction of National Unity against ‘the Jewish Alien’”. Critical Discourse Studies.
Toulmin, Stephen E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. 2003. “Argumentationstopos als sprachwissenschaftlicher Gegenstand. Für eine Erweiterung linguistischer Methoden bei der Analyse öffentlicher Diskurse.” In Sinnformeln. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern, edited by Susanne Geideck and Wolf-Andreas Liebert, 59–82. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2007. “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” Pragmatics and Cognition 15(1):203–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, edited by Willibald Steinmetz, 351–379. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015. The Politics of Fear – What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Peter Nowak, Johanna Pelikan, Helmut Gruber, Rudolf de Cillia, and Richard Mitten. 1990. ‘Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter!’ Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl. 2002. “‘Wenn einer Ariel heißt...’: Ein linguistisches Gutachten zur politischen Funktionalisierung antisemitischer Ressentiments in Österreich.” In Dreck am Stecken. Politik der Ausgrenzung, edited by Anton Pelinka, and Ruth Wodak, 134–172. Vienna: Czernin.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner. 2014. ‘Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: Right- wing Populism, collective memory and the fictionalization of politics’ Visual Communication 13/21: 231–255.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and John E. Richardson (eds.) 2013. Analysing Fascist Discourse. European Fascism in Talk and Text. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral (eds.) 2013. Right-wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Parvaresh, Vahid & Gemma Harvey
2023. Rhetorical Questions as Conveyors of Hate Speech. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Felberg, Tatjana & Ljiljana Šarić
2021. Chocolate, identity, and extreme speech online. FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 7:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper & Elena Semino
2021. Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society 32:3 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Burke, Shani, Parisa Diba & Georgios A Antonopoulos
2020. ‘You sick, twisted messes’: The use of argument and reasoning in Islamophobic and anti-Semitic discussions on Facebook. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 374 ff. DOI logo
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou
2017. (Im)politeness and Identity. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.