Representing “terrorism”
The radicalisation of the May 2013 Woolwich attack in British press reportage
This paper uses critical stylistics to analyse the British press’s use of the term “terrorism” in their reporting of the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby outside the military barracks in Woolwich, London on 22nd May 2013. It considers academic definitions of “terrorism” and compares these to the use of the term in newspaper reports on the attack. The authors seek to understand how the Woolwich attack is fit into a complex and contested concept such as terrorism. A close reading of a small corpus of national newspaper articles was used to identify common themes in the way the incident is portrayed, with critical stylistic analysis being applied to investigate how the term “terrorism” is used in context. The study highlights how the application of the “terrorism” label is justified within the articles despite the scarcity of information regarding the attack and persons involved at the time of their publication.
References (15)
References
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, and Tony McEnery. 2009. A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Edwards, Geraint O. 2012. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the Construction of ‘In-groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 Manifestos of the British National Party.” Discourse & Society 23(3):245–258.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fowler, Roger. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News London: Routledge.
Greenwald, Glenn. 2013. “Was the London Killing of a British Soldier ‘Terrorism’?” <Available at [URL]> [Accessed 4 March 2014]
Hoffman, Bruce. 2006. Inside Terrorism. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Jeffries, Lesley. 2010. Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
L’Hote, Emilie. 2010. “New Labour and Globalization: Globalist Discourse with a Twist?” Discourse & Society 21(4):355–376.
Muslim Council of Britain. 2013. “Muslims Condemn Attack on Soldier in Woolwich” <Available at [URL]> [Accessed 4 March 2014]
Novotny, Daniel D. 2007. “What is Terrorism?” In Focus on Terrorism (Volume 81), edited by Edward V. Linden, 23–32. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, John E. 2007 Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodin, David. 2004. “Terrorism without Intention.” Ethics 1141:752–771.
USC United States Code, 22 USC § 2656f “Annual Country Reports on Terrorism” <Available via Cornell University Legal Information Institute at [URL]> [Accessed 4 March 2014]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Baker, Paul & Tony McEnery
2019.
The Value of Revisiting and Extending Previous Studies: The Case of Islam in the UK Press. In
Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists [
Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, ],
► pp. 215 ff.
Tabbert, Ulrike
2016.
Critical Stylistics. In
Language and Crime,
► pp. 27 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.