Cover not available
Article published In:
Dementia-compromised language conflict and aggression
Edited by Boyd Davis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:1] 2016
► pp. 62–89

Opposing orientations in interactions with individuals with Frontotemporal Dementia

Blurring the boundaries between conflict and collaboration

| Rutgers University, USA

Clinically, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is described as primarily affecting personality and interpersonal conduct and resulting in social behavioral disruptions, thus often giving rise to interpersonal conflict. Conflict behavior in both typical and dementia populations is frequently identified as explicit physical and verbal acts such as assault, yelling or insulting, and research often situates conflict and collaboration as opposing dimensions. The premise of this article is to examine the unfolding of moments in which individuals diagnosed with FTD and their carers demonstrate opposing orientations towards an activity in real time interaction: A home nurse needing to fulfill an institutional agenda — taking sitting blood pressure — seeks the cooperation from an individual who, in attempting to lie down, interferes with this agenda. These moments constitute sources of interactional conflict that carers attempt to resolve. However, often conflict behavior and cooperative behavior are not neatly teased apart; for instance, individuals often display conflicting orientations towards an overarching or guiding activity while cooperating in more immediate and discrete interactional tasks. These verbal/nonverbal conflicts are not large acts of aggression; rather, they may be viewed as arising within the mundane moments of life that individuals face in everyday contexts and frequently.

Keywords: conversation analysis, engagement, frontotemporal dementia, collaboration, conflict
Published online: 11 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.1.03mik
References
Algase, Donna L., Cornelia Beck, Ann Whall, Stanley Berent, Kathy Richards, and Elizabeth Beattie
1996 “Need-driven Dementia-compromised Behavior: An Alternative View of Disruptive Behavior.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 11(6): 10–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
2012 “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1549–1553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
2005 “Context Ex Machina.” In Semantics Versus Pragmatics, edited by Zoltan Gendler Szabo, 15–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bozeat, Sasha, Carol A. Gregory, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, and John R. Hodges
2000 “Which Neuropsychiatric and Behavioural Features Distinguish Frontal and Temporal Variants of Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer’s Disease?” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 691: 178–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerejeira, Joaquim, L. Lagarto, and Elizabeta B. Mukaetova-Ladinska
2012 “Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.” Frontiers in Neurology 3 (73): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
2002 “Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1385–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska
1999 “Measurement of Inappropriate Behavior Associated with Dementia.” Journal of Gerontological Nursing 251: 42–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Agitated Behavior in Persons with Dementia: The Relationship between Type of Behavior, its Frequency, and its Disruptiveness.” Journal of Psychiatric Research 43 (1): 64–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska, and N. Billig
1986 “Agitated Behaviors in the Elderly: A Conceptual Review.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 341: 711–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehl-Schmid, Janine, Susanne Bornshein, Corina Pohl, Hans Forstl, Alexander Kurz, and Thomas Jahn
2011 Cognitive Decline in the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 23 (2): 230–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilley, D.W., J.L. Bienias, R.S. Wilson, D.A. Bennett, T.L. Beck, and D.A. Evans
2004 “Influence of Behavioral Symptoms on Rates of Institutionalization for Persons with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Psychological Medicine 6 (6): 1129–1135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul H
1975 Logic and conversation. In Studies in Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–59. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
2001 “Questions and Strategic Orientation in Verbal Conflict Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1815–1857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Mark. A
2012 “Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences.” Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden
2013 “The Conversation Analysis Approach to Transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2001 “Goffman, Garfinkel and Conversation Analysis.” In Discourse, Theory and Practice, edited by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 47–56. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2002 “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1427–1446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Nathan
2001 “Recommendations for the Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 28 (Suppl. 1): S96–S107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena
2002 “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1447–1471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kipps, Christopher, Jonathon A. Knibb, and John R. Hodges
2007 “Clinical Presentations of Frontotemporal Dementia.” In Frontotemporal Dementia Syndrome, edited by John R. Hodges, 38–79. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mates, Andrea W., Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith
(eds.) 2010 Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas
1988 “Language, Interaction and Social Problems.” Social Problems 35 (4): 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Mario F., Sylvia S. Fong, Jill S. Shapira, Elvira E. Jimenez, Natalie C. Kaiser, Sarah A. Kremen, and Po-Heng Tsai
2014 “Observation of Social behavior in Frontotemporal Dementia.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 29 (3): 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Mario F., and Jill S. Shapira
2005 “Loss of Insight and Functional Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia.” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 171: 413–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, Lisa
2009 “Conversational Practices of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and his Interlocutors.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 135–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a “Repetitional Response in Frontotemporal Dementia Discourse: Asserting Agency or Demonstrating Confusion?” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 465–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “Examining Perseverative Behaviors of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and Caregiver Responses: The Benefits of Observing Ordinary Interactions and Reflections on Caregiver Stress.” In Discourse, Sociality and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind, edited by Andrea W. Mates, Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith, 85–113. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2014 “Conflicting Demonstrations of Understanding in Interactions with Individuals with Frontotemporal Dementia: Considering Cognitive Resources and their Implications for Caring and Communication.” In Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive and Communicative Resources for Engagement, edited by Robert Schrauf, and Nicole Muller, 147–180. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
In press. “The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3). DOI logo
Mioshi, E., S. Hsieh, S. Savage, M. Hornberger, and John R. Hodges
2010 “Clinical Staging and Disease Progression in Frontotemporal Dementia.” Neurology 741: 1691–1597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neary, David, Julie S. Snowden, L. Gustafson, U. Passant, D. Stuss, S. Black, M. Freedman, A. Kertesz, P.H. Robert, M. Albert, K. Boone, B.L. Miller, J. Cummings, and D.F. Benson
1998 “Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: A Consensus on Clinical Diagnostic Criteria.” Neurology 511: 1546–1554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neary, David, Julie Snowden, and David Mann
2005 “Frontotemporal Dementia.” The Lancet Neurology 4 (11): 771–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Barbara J. Fehr
2007 “Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 64–91. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Pondy, Louis R
1967 “Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models.” Administrative Science Quarterly 121: 296–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L. Linda, and Marshall S. Poole
1987 “Conflict and Negotiation.” In Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by Frederic M. Jablin, Linda L. Putnam, Karlene Roberts, and Lyman Porter, 549–599. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1973 “Current Research in Conversation Analysis: The Preference for Agreement.” Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of American Summer Institute. Ann Arbor, MI.
Sarangi, Srikant K., and Stefaan Slembrouck
1992 “Non-Cooperation in Communication: A Reassessment of Gricean Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 171: 117–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. S
2010 “Exploring the Moral Basis of Social Action in Frontotemporal Dementia.” In Discourse, Sociality and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind, edited by Andrea W. Mates, Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith, 49–84. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teri, Linda, Peter Rabins, Peter Whitehouse, Leonard Berg, Barry Reisberg, Trey Sunderland, Burr Eichelman, and Creighton Phelps
1992 “Management of Behavior Disturbance in Alzheimer Disease: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 6 (2): 77–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Alexander J., Susanne Meares, Perminder S. Sachdev, and Henry Brodaty
2005 “The Differentiation of Mild Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer’s Disease and Health Aging by Neuropsychological Tests.” International Psychogeriatrics 171: 57–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah
2002 “Introduction to Special Issue.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1333–1343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Huang, Lihe & Yiran Che
2023. Pragmatic impairment and multimodal compensation in older adults with dementia. Language and Health 1:1 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Mikesell, Lisa
2016. The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.