Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 4:2 (2016) ► pp.202–233

Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity

A case study of heckling

| University of Huddersfield, UK
| Performing artist
This paper analyses the phenomenon of participatory ambiguity in aggressive ritualistic interactions. One can ‘participate’ (Goffman 1979, 1981) in an interaction in different statuses, and these statuses entail different interactional constraints and obligations, also within the realms of language aggression and conflict. We are interested in a specific aspect of participation, namely ratification — the assumed right to participate in an interaction. ‘Ambiguity’ describes forms of behaviour which deviate from participant and observer expectations of interacting in certain discursive roles, without clearly violating (un)ratified participation roles. Examining the relationship between participatory ambiguity and language aggression fills an important knowledge gap in the field, as this area has been relatively ignored. We take heckling in experimental performing arts as a case study.
Keywords: participatory ambiguity, ritual, heckling, performing arts
Published online: 20 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.2.03kad
References (64)
Agha, Asif. 1997. “Tropic Aggression in the Clinton-Dole Presidential Debate.” Pragmatics 7 (4): 461–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agyekum, Kofi. 2002. “The Communicative Role of Silence in Akan.” Pragmatics 12 (1): 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Judith. 2002. “Competing Discourses in the Classroom: A Post-structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls’ and Boys’ Speech in Public Contexts.” Language in Society 13 (6): 827–842.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broadhurst, Susan. 1999. Liminal Acts: A Critical Overview of Contemporary Performance and Theory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Buder, Eugene H. 1991. “A Nonlinear Model of Social Interaction.” Communication Research 18 (2): 174–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1993. “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review 581: 110–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Oliver Holmes. 2013. “(Im)politeness and Exploitative TV in Britain and North America: The X Factor and American Idol .” In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action, ed. by Nuria Lorenzo-Dus and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 169–198. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. “No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (2): 241–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (ed.). 2010. “Impoliteness across Cultures”. Special Issue of Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4).Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Majorie Goodwin. 1990. “Interstitial Argument.” In Conflict Talk, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Context, Activity and Participation.” In The Contextualisation of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzo, 77–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1997. “Byplay: Negotiating Evaluation in Storytelling.” In Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov, Volume 21, ed. by Gregory R. Guy, Feagin Crawford, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh, 77–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatch, Mary Jo, and Sanford B. Erhlich. 1993. “Spontaneous Humour as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations.” Organization Studies 14 (4): 505–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield. 2013. “Mock Impoliteness, Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1099–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haworth, Kate. 2006. “The Dynamics of Power and Resistance in Police Interview Discourse.” Discourse & Society 17 (6): 739–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Shu-Hui. 2013. “What Do You See and Why? A Look into the Perspective of Documentaries.” GFTS International Journal on Media & Communications 1 (1): 90–97.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. “Strategic Use of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (4): 885–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Keith. 1987. The Dilemma of Parliament. New York: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 1982. The Rhetoric of Witnessing and Heckling: A Case Study in Ethnorhetoric. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1993. “Failures in Higher Order Conditions in the Organization of Witnessing and Heckling Episodes.” In Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Scott Jacobs, and Sally Jackson, 140–169. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2012. “Relational Ritual.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Heckling: A Mimetic-Interpersonal Perspective.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness, and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Melvin De La Cruz. In press. “Rituals of Outspokenness and Verbal Conflict.” Pragmatics and Society 7(2): 265–290. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaegi, Stefan. 2014. “Provoking Audience.” TDR 58 (3): 2–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia M., and Peter Kenneth Lunt. 1994. Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markel, Sherry. 1999. “Gendered Voices: Provocateur in an On-line Virtual Conference Course for In-service Teachers.” In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1999, ed. by J. Price, 332–336. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Discourse.” Language in Society 271: 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mogg, Karin, and Brendan P. Bradley. 1999. “Orienting of Attention to Threatening Facial Expressions Presented under Conditions of Restricted Awareness.” Cognition and Emotion 13 (6): 713–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakane, Ikuko. 2006. “Silence and Politeness in Intercultural Communication in University Seminars.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (11): 1811–1835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orum, Anthony M., Joe R. Feagin, and Gideon Sjoberg. 1991. “Introduction: The Nature of the Case Study.” In A Case for Case Study, ed. by Joe R. Feagin, Anthony M. Orum, and Gideon Sjoberg, 1–26. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy. 2009. “Intonation as a Pragmatic Resource in EFL Interaction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Planken, Bridgette. 2005. “English as a Lingua Franca in International Business Contexts.” English for Specific Purposes 24 (4): 367–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, Sameer. 2011. “‘Joke’s on You!’: Stand-up Comedy Performance and the Management of Hecklers.” M.A. thesis, [online] Available at: [URL]
Reiman, Tonya. 2008. The Power of Body Language. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rook, Dennis W. 1985. “The Ritual Dimension of Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (3): 251–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2008. The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2012. “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2013. “Decoding Encoded (Im)politeness: ‘Cause on My Teasing You Depend.’” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., Ronan S. Bernas, and David J. Calhiccia. 1997. “Conflict Talk: Understanding and Resolving Arguments.” In Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives, ed. by Talmy Givón, 233–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stopfner, Maria. 2013. Streitkultur im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im Österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1981. “New York Jewish Conversational Style.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 301: 133–149.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “The Distinction Between Generalised and Particularised Implicatures and Linguistic Politeness.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, ed. by Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser, and Henk Zeevat, 174–188. Bielefeld: ZiF.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny. 1983. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure.” Applied Linguistics 4 (2): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar
. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1987. The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walcott, William H. 2007. Knowledge, Competence and Communication: Chomsky, Freire, Searle, and Communicative Language Teaching. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don. 1998. “Identities, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2022. Aggression and its (de)escalation in mediatised rites of aggression. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Kumar, Ritesh
2020. #shutdownjnu vs #standwithjnu. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2019. Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiayi
2019. Dániel Z. Kádár, Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction . Internet Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.