Fuelling ethno-sectarian conflicts
(De)legitimization and impoliteness in readers’ responses in an Arab online media
The paper investigates how (de)legitimization and impoliteness are interconnected in the ethno-sectarian conflicts that take place in online news response threads. (De)legitimization is conceptualized as a micro argumentative practice that can index the interlocutors’ sociopolitical stances and position them in relation to each other in inter-group contestations. Using multi-tiered positioning analysis, a distinction was made between exogenous and endogenous impoliteness assessments each of which occurred at a different spatiotemporal level of the interactions. This distinction elucidates how impoliteness assessments can trigger and be triggered by (de)legitimization. To understand how (de)legitimization might trigger impoliteness assessments, I differentiate between face-related and identity-related impoliteness, which were both used strategically to deepen the ethno-sectarian divisions in this online context. In the online conflicts in question, collective impoliteness was sometimes motivated by legitimization, rather than delegitimization, even though legitimization involves no violation of the genre-sanctioned interactional norms or the moral order. That was because legitimization functioned in binary oppositions, and, as such, was perceived by out-group members as provocative impingement on their ethno-sectarian communities’ sociopolitical rights.
References (48)
Al-Tahmazi, Thulfiqar
2015 “
The Pursuit of Power in Iraqi Political Discourse: Unpacking the Construction of Sociopolitical Communities on Facebook.”
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 47–265.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2014 “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube”.
Journal of Pragmatics, 731:19–36.
Cap, Piotr
2010 Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Gila Shauer, Leyla Marti, Meilian Mei, and Minna Nevala
2014 “
Impoliteness and Emotions in a Crosscultural Perspective.”
SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 301: 67–88.
Dahlberg, Lincoln
2007 “
Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation.”
Journal of New Media and Society 9 (5): 827–847.
Davies, Bronwyn, and Harré, Rom
1990 “
Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.”
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Fuller, Graham, and Rend Rahim Francke
2001 The Arab Shi’a: The Forgotten Muslims. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “
The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In
the Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by
Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. New York: Information Science Reference.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2013 “
Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward.”
Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2013 “
Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol
.”
Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 97–121.
Habermas, Jurgen
1984 The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen
1989 The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge and Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hall, Gary
2008 Digitize this Book: The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Haugh, Michael
2013 “
Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.”
Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72.
Haugh, Michael
2015 Im/Politeness Implicature. Berlin, Munich and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Herring, Susan C
2007 “
A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-mediated Discourse.”
Language@ internet 4 (1): 1–37.
Kádár, Dániel, Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaul de Marlangeon, Silvia
KhosraviNik, Majid
2010 “
Macro and Micro Legitimation in Discourse on Iran’s Nuclear Programme: The Case of Iranian National Newspaper Kayhan.”
Discourse and Society 7 (1): 55–72.
KhosraviNik, Majid
2014 “
Critical Discourse Analysis, Power and New Media: Issues and Debates.” In
Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. by
Monika Weronika Kopytowska and
Yusuf Kalyango, 287–306. New York: Peter Lang.
KhosraviNik, Majid
2015 “
Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions, and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.”
Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72.
Kleinke, Sonja, and Brite Bös
Lange, Patricia G
2014 “
Commenting on YouTube Rants: Perceptions of Inappropriateness or Civic Engagement?”
Journal of Pragmatics 731: 53–65.
Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam Locher
2012 “
Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in online Disagreements.”
Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1591–1606.
Linell, Per
1998 “
Discourse Across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.”
Text and Talk 18 (2): 43–57.
Locher, Miriam, and Derek Bousfield
2008 “
Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In
Impoliteness in Language, ed. by
Derek Bousfield and
Miriam Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Markham, Annette, and the AoIR ethics Working Committee
2012 Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Approved by AoIR, 12/2012. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from
[URL].
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun van Dijk
1997 “
‘There was a Problem and it was Solved!’ Legitimation the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Immigrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.”
Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–567.
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd
2011 “
I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience”.
New Media and Society 13 (1): 114–133.
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh
2015 “
Agency, Accountability and Evaluations of Impoliteness.”
Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 207–238.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “
Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.”
Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–807.
Ruhi, Şükriye, and Hale Işık-Güler
2007 “
Conceptualizing Face and Relational Work in (Im)politeness: Revelations from Politeness Lexemes and Idioms in Turkish.”
Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 681–711.
Sellers, Mortimer
2004 “
Ideals of Public Discourse.” In
Civility and its Discontents, ed. by
Christine Sistare, 15–24. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Sowińska, Agnieszka, and Tatiana Dubrovskaya
2012 “
Discursive Construction and Transformation of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Categories in the Newspaper Coverage on the US Anti-ballistic Missile system: Polish versus Russian View.”
Discourse and Society 6 (4): 449–468.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005 “
(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport : Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.”
Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2008 “
Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport”. In
Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, 2nd ed., ed. by
Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London: Continuum.
Svensson, Jakob
2008 “
Expressive Rationality: A Different Approach for Understanding Participation in Municipal Deliberative Practices.”
Communication and Culture Critique 11: 203–221.
Van Dijk, Teun
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “
Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.”
Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Altahmazi, Thulfiqar Hussein M.
2022.
Impoliteness in Twitter diplomacy: offence giving and taking in Middle East diplomatic crises.
Journal of Politeness Research 18:2
► pp. 281 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.