Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and ConflictVol. 5:1 (2017) ► pp.1–29
Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales
Despite its centrality to religiously aggravated hate crime recorded in England and Wales, the nature of the language used has been neglected in research. This paper, based on a unique dataset, aims to rectify this. It takes its approach from the field of linguistic impoliteness, a field that has yet to consider hate crime. Therein lies our second aim: To consider whether impoliteness notions can be usefully extended to the language of hate crime. In our data, we examine, in particular, conventionalized impoliteness formulae, insults, threats, incitement and taboo words. Whilst we reveal some linguistic support for the way religiously aggravated hate crime is framed in the law and discussed in the legal literature, we highlight areas of neglect and potential ambiguity. Regarding impoliteness, we demonstrate its effectiveness as an approach to these data, but we also highlight areas of neglect in that literature too, notably, non-conditional threats and incitement.
Keywords: impoliteness, hate crime, insults, threats, incitement, taboo words, identity, religion
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: Hate crime, the law and impoliteness
- 2.1Hate crime in the legal context of England and Wales
- 2.2Linguistic impoliteness
- 3.The data and method
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Method
- 4.The building blocks of the language of hate crime
- 4.1Prefabricated or creative?
- 4.2The hate crime language mix: Coercive impoliteness
- 4.3A focus on insults
- 4.4A focus on threats
- 4.5A focus on incitement and negative expressives
- 4.6Intensification: Taboo words
- 5.Identity attacks
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (50)
Archer, Dawn. 2005. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
Asquith, Nicole. 2009. “The Harms of Verbal and Textual Hatred Hate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime.” In Hate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime, edited by Paul Iganski, 161–173. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1962/1975. (2nd edn.) How to do Things with Words. Edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Beebe, Leslie M. 1995. “Polite Fictions: Instrumental Rudeness as Pragmatic Competence.” In Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, edited by James E. Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehle, Brent Gallenberger and Maggie Ronkin, 154–168. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, Malcolm, and Alison Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
Croom, Adam M. 2013. “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language and Communication 33 (3):177–204.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367.
. 2010. “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(12):3232–3245.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Marti, Leyla, Mei, Meilian, Nevala, Minna and Gila Schauer. 2010. “Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7–4: 597–624.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delgado, Richard. 1982. “Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 171:133–181.
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolen. 1981. “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271:93–109.
Gabriel, Yiannis. 1998. “An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations.” Human Relations 51(11):1329–1354.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2009. “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The Culture Wars.” Journal of Politeness Research 51:273–304.
. 2013. “Face, Identity, and Im/politeness: Looking Backwards, Moving forward – From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1):1–33.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2013. “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 97–120.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou. Forthcoming. “(Im)politeness and Identity.” In Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Kádár. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. London and New York: Academic Press.
Harris, Sandra. 1984. “Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates’ Courts.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 491:5–28.
Holtgraves, Thomas. 2005. “Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, and Linguistic Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 11:73–93.
Iganski, Paul. 2008. Hate Crime and the City. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Kleinke, Sonja and Birte Bös. 2015. “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of Its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora.” Pragmatics 25(1):47–71.
Kurzon, Dennis. 1998. “The Speech Act Status of Incitement: Perlocutionary Acts Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 29(5):571–596.
Lachenicht, Lance G. 1980. “Aggravating Language: A Study of Abusive and Insulting Language.” International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4):607–688.
Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 221:293–330.
Limberg, Holger. 2009. “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(7):1376–1394.
Locher, Miriam A. 2006. “Polite Behaviour within Relational Work: The Discursive Approach to Politeness.” Multilingua 25(3):249–267.
. 2008. “Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction.” In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communication edited by Gerd Antos, and Eijos Ventola, 509–540. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam A. and Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Martínez-Cabeza, Miguel A. 2009. “Dangerous Words: Threats, Perlocutions and Strategic Actions.” In Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data, edited by Wiesław Oleksy, and Piotr Stalmaszczyk, 269–284. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Matsuda, Mari. 1989. “Public Responses to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story.” Michigan Law Review 871:2320–2381.
Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea. 2000. Delete Expletives?: Research Undertaken jointly by the Advertising Standards Authority, British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting Standards Commission and the Independent Television Commission. London: ASA, BBC, BSC and ITC.
Rudanko, Juhani. 2006. “Aggravated Impoliteness and Two Types of Speaker Intention in an Episode in Shakespeare's Timon of Athens.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(6):829–841.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 391:639–656.
. 2008. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (2ndedn). London and New York: Continuum.
Tedeschi, James T., and Richard B. Felson. 1994. Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
. 2002. “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 31:179–201.
. 2003. “Generalised and Particularised Implicatures of Politeness.” In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, edited by Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser, and Henk Zeevat, 151–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Tracy, Karen. 2008. “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4(2):169–191.
Walters, Mark Austin. 2013. “Conceptualizing ‘Hostility’ for Hate Crime Law: Minding ‘the Minutiae’ when Interpreting Section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34(1):47–74.
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, Stacy L. 2004. “Factors that Influence Recipients’ Appraisals of Hurtful Communication.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 211:291–303.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed & Mouna Goubaa
2024. Taboo language in a sample of Egyptian op-eds: A corpus-based socio-cognitive study. Discourse & Society 
Guardamagna, Caterina, Jessica Hampton, Mariana Roccia & Djordje Sredanovic
2024. Microaggressions and impoliteness at the crossroads. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Lepoutre, Maxime, Sara Vilar-Lluch, Emma Borg & Nat Hansen
2024. What is Hate Speech? The Case for a Corpus Approach. Criminal Law and Philosophy 18:2 ► pp. 397 ff.
McEnery, Tony & Gavin Brookes
2024. Corpus linguistics and the social sciences. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
Thompson, Rachel G. A., Ebenezer Agbaglo & Mohammed Yakub
2024. “…you were reared”: Response Comments on Verbal Attacks in Political Discourse on GhanaWeb. Emerging Media 2:2 ► pp. 210 ff.
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Cartooning and sexism in the time of Covid-19: Metaphors and metonymies in the Arab mind. Discourse & Society 34:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Adibeik, Arezoo
2023. Constructing East Asians in a European comic book series. Chinese Semiotic Studies 19:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff.
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Unmasking Malicious Stance Indicators and Attitudinal Priming: An ‘Evaluative Textbite’ Approach to Identity Attacks in Violent Extremist Discourse. Corpus Pragmatics
Giménez García, Roser & Sheila Queralt
2023. Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability? How Forensic Linguistics Can Contribute to Terrorism Trials. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Mattiello, Elisa
Ruzaitė, Jūratė
2023. Counteracting Homophobic Discourse in Internet Comments: Fuelling or Mediating Conflict?. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 397 ff.
Talebzadeh, Hossein & Marzieh Khazraie
2023. “You can f*** get lost already”: (Responding to) impoliteness in the (in-)authentic discourse of comedy and crime TV series and movies. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 485 ff.
Talebzadeh, Hossein & Marzieh Khazraie
2024. ‘Ignoring the elephant in the room’: (Under-)representation of impoliteness phenomenon in popular ELT textbooks. Language Teaching Research 28:4 ► pp. 1311 ff.
Vilar-Lluch, Sara
2023. Understanding and appraising ‘hate speech’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:2 ► pp. 279 ff.
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Komalova, Liliya, Anna Glazkova, Dmitry Morozov, Rostislav Epifanov, Leonid Motovskikh & Ekaterina Mayorova
2022. Automated Classification of Potentially Insulting Speech Acts on Social Network Sites. In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1503], ► pp. 365 ff.
Rodrigo, Susana Ridao
2021. La (des)cortesía en el ámbito político: estudio del debate electoral español de 2019. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 21:1 ► pp. 249 ff.
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper & Elena Semino
2021. Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society 32:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Burke, Shani & Mirko A. Demasi
2020. “This Country Will Be Big Racist One Day”: Extreme Prejudice as Reasoned Discourse in Face-to-Face Interactions. In Political Communication, ► pp. 205 ff.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Maria Vasilaki
2020. The personal and/as the political. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 11 ff.
Sifianou, Maria
2019. Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship?. Journal of Pragmatics 147 ► pp. 49 ff.
Georgakopoulou, Alex & Maria Vasilaki
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Stuart Macdonald
2018. Othering the West in the online Jihadist propaganda magazines Inspire and Dabiq
. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Terkourafi, Marina, Lydia Catedral, Iftikhar Haider, Farzad Karimzad, Jeriel Melgares, Cristina Mostacero-Pinilla, Julie Nelson & Benjamin Weissman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.