Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 5:1 (2017) ► pp.1–29

Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales

| Lancaster University, UK
| Lancaster University, UK
| Lancaster University, UK

Despite its centrality to religiously aggravated hate crime recorded in England and Wales, the nature of the language used has been neglected in research. This paper, based on a unique dataset, aims to rectify this. It takes its approach from the field of linguistic impoliteness, a field that has yet to consider hate crime. Therein lies our second aim: To consider whether impoliteness notions can be usefully extended to the language of hate crime. In our data, we examine, in particular, conventionalized impoliteness formulae, insults, threats, incitement and taboo words. Whilst we reveal some linguistic support for the way religiously aggravated hate crime is framed in the law and discussed in the legal literature, we highlight areas of neglect and potential ambiguity. Regarding impoliteness, we demonstrate its effectiveness as an approach to these data, but we also highlight areas of neglect in that literature too, notably, non-conditional threats and incitement.

Keywords: impoliteness, hate crime, insults, threats, incitement, taboo words, identity, religion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Hate crime, the law and impoliteness
    • 2.1Hate crime in the legal context of England and Wales
    • 2.2Linguistic impoliteness
  • 3.The data and method
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.The building blocks of the language of hate crime
    • 4.1Prefabricated or creative?
    • 4.2The hate crime language mix: Coercive impoliteness
    • 4.3A focus on insults
    • 4.4A focus on threats
    • 4.5A focus on incitement and negative expressives
    • 4.6Intensification: Taboo words
  • 5.Identity attacks
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 16 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
References
Archer, Dawn
2005 Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asquith, Nicole
2009 “The Harms of Verbal and Textual Hatred Hate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime.” In Hate Crimes: The Consequences of Hate Crime, edited by Paul Iganski, 161–173. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1962/1975 (2nd edn.) How to do Things with Words. Edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M.
1995 “Polite Fictions: Instrumental Rudeness as Pragmatic Competence.” In Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, edited by James E. Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehle, Brent Gallenberger and Maggie Ronkin, 154–168. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, and Alison Johnson
2007 An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croom, Adam M.
2013 “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language and Communication 33 (3):177–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(12):3232–3245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Marti, Leyla, Mei, Meilian, Nevala, Minna and Gila Schauer
2010 “Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7–4: 597–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado, Richard
1982 “Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 171:133–181.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolen
1981 “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271:93–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Yiannis
1998 “An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations.” Human Relations 51(11):1329–1354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The Culture Wars.” Journal of Politeness Research 51:273–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Face, Identity, and Im/politeness: Looking Backwards, Moving forward – From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1):1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2013 “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou
Forthcoming. “(Im)politeness and Identity.” In Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Kádár Basingstoke Palgrave DOI logo
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1984 “Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates’ Courts.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 491:5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas
2005 “Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, and Linguistic Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 11:73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iganski, Paul
2008 Hate Crime and the City. Bristol: The Policy Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja and Birte Bös
2015 “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of Its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora.” Pragmatics 25(1):47–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis
1998 “The Speech Act Status of Incitement: Perlocutionary Acts Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 29(5):571–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lachenicht, Lance G.
1980 “Aggravating Language: A Study of Abusive and Insulting Language.” International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4):607–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae
1993 “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 221:293–330.Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger
2009 “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(7):1376–1394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2006 “Polite Behaviour within Relational Work: The Discursive Approach to Politeness.” Multilingua 25(3):249–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction.” In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communication edited by Gerd Antos, and Eijos Ventola, 509–540. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Derek Bousfield
2008 “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Cabeza, Miguel A.
2009 “Dangerous Words: Threats, Perlocutions and Strategic Actions.” In Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data, edited by Wiesław Oleksy, and Piotr Stalmaszczyk, 269–284. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari
1989 “Public Responses to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story.” Michigan Law Review 871:2320–2381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea
2000 Delete Expletives?: Research Undertaken jointly by the Advertising Standards Authority, British Broadcasting Corporation, Broadcasting Standards Commission and the Independent Television Commission. London: ASA, BBC, BSC and ITC.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
2006 “Aggravated Impoliteness and Two Types of Speaker Intention in an Episode in Shakespeare's Timon of Athens.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(6):829–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 391:639–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures (2ndedn). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, James T., and Richard B. Felson
1994 Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2001 Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 31:179–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Generalised and Particularised Implicatures of Politeness.” In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, edited by Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser, and Henk Zeevat, 151–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1995 Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4(2):169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walters, Mark Austin
2013 “Conceptualizing ‘Hostility’ for Hate Crime Law: Minding ‘the Minutiae’ when Interpreting Section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34(1):47–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Stacy L.
2004 “Factors that Influence Recipients’ Appraisals of Hurtful Communication.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 211:291–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Cartooning and sexism in the time of Covid-19: Metaphors and metonymies in the Arab mind. Discourse & Society 34:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Adibeik, Arezoo
2023. Constructing East Asians in a European comic book series. Chinese Semiotic Studies 19:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Burke, Shani & Mirko A. Demasi
2020. “This Country Will Be Big Racist One Day”: Extreme Prejudice as Reasoned Discourse in Face-to-Face Interactions. In Political Communication, ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2023. Heteroglossia and Identifying Victims of Violence and Its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse Online. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2 ► pp. 907 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2022. Identity, ideology and threatening communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulou, Alex & Maria Vasilaki
2018. The personal and/as the political. Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Maria Vasilaki
2020. The personal and/as the political. In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Komalova, Liliya, Anna Glazkova, Dmitry Morozov, Rostislav Epifanov, Leonid Motovskikh & Ekaterina Mayorova
2022. Automated Classification of Potentially Insulting Speech Acts on Social Network Sites. In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1503], ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Lepoutre, Maxime, Sara Vilar-Lluch, Emma Borg & Nat Hansen
2023. What is Hate Speech? The Case for a Corpus Approach. Criminal Law and Philosophy DOI logo
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Stuart Macdonald
2018. Othering the West in the online Jihadist propaganda magazines Inspire and Dabiq . Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mattiello, Elisa
2023. Slang and verbal aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Rodrigo, Susana Ridao
2021. La (des)cortesía en el ámbito político: estudio del debate electoral español de 2019. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 21:1 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria
2019. Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship?. Journal of Pragmatics 147 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Talebzadeh, Hossein & Marzieh Khazraie
2021. ‘Ignoring the elephant in the room’: (Under-)representation of impoliteness phenomenon in popular ELT textbooks. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110290 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina, Lydia Catedral, Iftikhar Haider, Farzad Karimzad, Jeriel Melgares, Cristina Mostacero-Pinilla, Julie Nelson & Benjamin Weissman
2018. Uncivil Twitter. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper & Elena Semino
2021. Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society 32:3 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.