The aim of this study is to show how trans-national right-wing linguistic strategies and global xenophobic attitudes are reworked at national levels, and how, as a result, specialized country- and culture-specific coercion and legitimization strategies arise. Using a detailed, quantitative-qualitative method of analysis, we look at the Greek Cypriot extreme-right party ELAM to see how the party’s anti-migration rhetoric construes any foreign presence as threat, by proximizing it linguistically as ‘invasion.’ This strategy allows the conflation of the current ‘Other’ (migrants) with archetypical adversaries, such as Turkey. Indeed, anchoring the migration issue in the main national narrative, i.e., the long-standing Cypriot conflict, gives their xenophobic language conceptual coherence and strengthens its textual cohesion. In particular two figures of speech are the basis of this invasion script, the word metanasteftiko ‘the immigration phenomenon’ conceptualized as the kipriako (the Cyprus problem, i.e., the political division of the island). This parallelism opens the way for a number of inferences, while it also enables a conceptual shift from the real phenomenon known as globalization and multiculturalism to the imagined idea of a (white/Western) genocide. Data include comments responding to ELAM followers’ YouTube videos and mainstream press representations. Methodology includes corpus linguistics and discourse analysis focused on the fundamental metaphors found in the data such as migration as unbearable weight and migration as dirt.
Altman, Meryl. 1990. “How Not to Do Things with Metaphors We Live by”. College English 52(5):495–506.
Arendt, Hannah. (1963) 1994. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Classics.
Baider, Fabienne. 2012. “Hatred. The Saliency Hypothesis”. In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, edited by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 7–25. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19(3):273–306.
Billig, Michael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions. Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
Delwit, Pascal (ed.). 2012. Le Front national. Mutations de l'extrême droite française. Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Derks, Daantje, Agneta, H. Fischer and Arjan, E.R. Bos. 2008. “The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review”. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3): 766–785.
Douglas, Mary. (1996) 2001. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.
Edelman, Murray Jacob. 1985 (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fillmore, Charles J.1975. “An Alternative to Check List Theories of Meanings”. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131.
Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hadjipavlou, Maria. 2004. The Women of Cyprus. Nicosia: PrintWays.
Hadjipavlou, Maria. 2007 “Multiple Realities and the Role of Peace Education in Deep-rooted Conflicts: The Case of Cyprus.” In Addressing Ethnic Conflict through Peace Education, edited by Zvi Bekerman and Claire AcGlynn, 35–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Hart, Christopher. 2008. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5(2):91–106.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ignazi, Piero. 2006. Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium”. European Journal of Political Research 461:319–345.
Katsourides, Yannos. 2013. “Determinants of Extreme Right Reappearance in Cyprus: The National Popular Front (ELAM), Golden Dawn’s Sister Party.” South European Society and Politics 18(4):567–589.
King, Russel. 2000. “Southern Europe in the Changing Global Map of Migration.” In Eldorado or Fortress: Migration in Southern Europe, edited by Russell King, Gabriella Lazaridis and Charalampos Tsardanides, 3–5. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Konstantinidou, Christina, and Martha Michailidou. 2014. “Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Photography and the Social Construction of Immigration in the Greek National Press.” In Visual Communication, edited by David Machin, 91–134. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, Cas. 2010. “The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy”. West European Politics 33(6):1167–1186.
Milioni, Dimitra L., Lia-Paschalia Spyridou, and Konstantinos Vadratsikas. 2015. “Framing Immigration in Online Media and Television News in Crisis-stricken Cyprus.” The Cyprus Review 27(1):155–85.
Mio, Jeffery Scott. 1997. “Metaphor and Politics”. Metaphor and Symbols 12(2):113–133.
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. “Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21(3):216–229.
Musolff, Andreas. 2006. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21(1):23–38.
Musolff, Andreas. 2007. “Which Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? The Function of Anti-Semitic Imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf.’” Patterns of Prejudice 41(1):21–44.
O’Brien, Gerald V.2003. “Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States”. Metaphor and Symbol 18(1):33–47.
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 71:131–193.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Rösner, Leonie, and Nicole Krämer. 2016. “Verbal Venting in the Social Web: Effects of Anonymity and Group Norms on Aggressive Language Use in Online Comments.” Social Media + Society, 1–13.
Santa Ana, Otto. 1999. “Like an Animal I was treated: Anti-Immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse & Society 10(2):191–224.
Stephan, Walter G., Oscar Ybarra, and Guy Bachman. 1999. “Prejudice toward Immigrants.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 291:2221–2237.
Stone, Deborah. 1988. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Taguieff, Pierre-André. 2012. Le nouveau national-populisme. Paris: CNRS editions.
Trimikliniotis, Nicos, and Corina Demetriou. 2014. “Immigration to Cyprus.” In European Immigration: A Sourcebook, edited by Anna Triandafyllidou and Ruby Gropas, 45–59. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, Teun A.1987. Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(1):83–118.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yilmaz, Feruh. 2012. “Right-wing Hegemony and Immigration: How the Populist far-right Achieved Hegemony through the Immigration Debate in Europe”. Current Sociology 60(3):368–381.
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2023. Radical Politics in Post-Conflict Settings. In Radicalization and Variations of Violence [Contributions to International Relations, ], ► pp. 173 ff.
Kamenou, Nayia
2023. Feminism contested and co-opted: Women, agency and politics of gender in the Greek and Greek-Cypriot far right. European Journal of Women's Studies 30:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
Buckingham, Louisa & Nusiebah Alali
2020. Extreme parallels: a corpus-driven analysis of ISIS and far-right discourse. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 15:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
2019. Le discours de haine dissimulée : le mépris pour humilier. Déviance et Société Vol. 43:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
Baider, Fabienne
2018. “Go to hell fucking faggots, may you die!” framing the LGBT subject in online comments. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Baider, Fabienne
2019. Double speech act: Negotiating inter-cultural beliefs and intra-cultural hate speech. Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 155 ff.
Baider, Fabienne
2020. Pragmatics lost?. Pragmatics and Society 11:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Ruzaite, Jurate
2018. In search of hate speech in Lithuanian public discourse: A corpus-assisted analysis of online comments. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
2017. Analysis of Online Comments to News Reports. In Online Hate Speech in the European Union [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 25 ff.
Baider, Fabienne & Monika Kopytowska
2017. Conceptualising the Other: Online discourses on the current refugee crisis in Cyprus and in Poland. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13:2
Baider, Fabienne & Monika Kopytowska
2018. Narrating hostility, challenging hostile narratives. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kopytowska, Monika & Fabienne Baider
2017. From stereotypes and prejudice to verbal and physical violence: Hate speech in context. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.