Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 10:1 (2011) ► pp. 50–67

Interdiscursivity between political and religious discourses in a speech by Sadat

Combining CDA and addressee rhetoric

| Cairo University
Religion and politics have a complicated relationship in the Arab world. Interdiscursivity within political speeches between religious and political discourses is a manifestation of this complexity. This article argues that this sort of interdiscursivity imposes hard restrictions on the responses of Muslim addressees. Muslims’ responses to Islamic sacred texts are inherently restricted because disagreement with divine texts amounts to heresy. Accordingly, their responses to political speeches that present themselves as semi-religious texts are highly restricted as well. I will analyze a speech by the late Egyptian president Sadat to show how potential and actual responses could be controlled by creating intertextual links with the Qur’an and adopting the genre of Islamic religious sermons. I combine analytical tools from critical discourse analysis and what I refer to as “addressee rhetoric” to investigate the relationship between interdiscursivity and addressee response.
Keywords: addressee rhetoric, Anwar al-Sadat, Arab political discourse, interdiscursivity, intertextuality, Qur’an, addressee response
Published online: 30 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.1.03abd
References
Abdul-Fattah, Nabil
1984 al-Muṣḥaf wa-al-sayf : ṣirā‘ al-dīn wa-al-dawlah fī Miṣr. (Almos’haf and the Sword: The Contest between Religion and the State in Egypt). Cairo: Madbouli.Google Scholar
Abdul-Latif, Emad
2005 Balāghat al-Mokhātab: al-Balāghah al-‘Arabīyah min Intāj al-Khiṭāb al-Sulṭawī ilá Muqāwamat (Addressee Rhetoric: Arabic Rhetoric and Discourse of power, from Production to Resistance). Selected Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Comparative Literature “Power and the Role of Intellectual”, Cairo, Pp 7–36.Google Scholar
2006 Min al-Wa‘y ilá al-Fi‘l: Muqārabāt Mu‘āṣirah fī Muqāwamat al-Khiṭāb al-Sulṭawī (From Consciousness to Act: Contemporary Approaches in Resisting the Discourse of Power). In proceedings of ‘Discours et Relations de Pouvoir’, International Conference, Cairo: Cairo University. Pp 567–585.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
(eds.) 2002 Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Norman Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Diab, kaid
2010 al-Muwāṭanah fi al-Fikr al-Miṣrī. (Citizenship in the Egyptian Political Thought). Cairo: Centre of Arabic and African Research.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992a Critical Language Awareness. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1992b Intertextuality in Critical Discourse Analysis. Linguistics and Education 41, 269–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanafi, Hasan
1986 al-Ḥarakāt al-Islāmīyah fī Miṣr (The Islamic Movements in Egypt). Beirut: Almoa’sasah Al-Islamieah Lelnashr.Google Scholar
Haykal, Muḥammad Ḥasanayn
1983 Autumn of Fury: the Assassination of Sadat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Israeli, Raphael
1998 The Pervasiveness of Islam in Contemporary Arab Political Discourse: The Cases of Sadat and Arafat. In Feldman, O., (ed.). Politically Speaking: A Worldwide Examination of Language Used in Public Sphere. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne and Louise Phillips
2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastely, James
1991 In Defense of Plato’s Gorgias. PMLA, Vol. 106, No. 1 (Jan 1991), pp 96–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKerrow, Raymie
1989 Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs, 561, pp 91–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, Abdul-Aleem
1990 al-Khiṭāb al-Sadatī (The Discourse of Sadat). Cairo: al-Ahālī.Google Scholar
Mostafa, Hala
1995 al-Niẓām al-siyāsī wa-al-mu‘ārḍah al-Islāmīyah fī Miṣr (The State and Islamic Opposition in Egypt). Cairo: El-Mahrousa P.H.Google Scholar
Plato
1979 Gorgias. Translated by Terrence Irwin. Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Sadat, Anwar
1977 Khuṭab wa-aḥādīth by Sādāt (Speeches and Interviews by Sadat). Cairo: Egyptian Information Services.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian
1988 In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon-Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Al-Rikaby, Ali Badeen Mohammed, Thulfiqar Hussein Altahmazi & Debbita Ai Lin Tan
2021.  In When Politicians Talk, ► pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Feldman, Ofer
2021.  In When Politicians Talk, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Feldman, Ofer & Sonja Zmerli
2018.  In The Psychology of Political Communicators, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ghanem, Salma & Barbara Speicher
2017. Comparative persuasive styles in Arabic and English: A study of the United Nations General Assembly Debate speeches. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 10:2 ► pp. 168 ff. Crossref logo
Hobbs, Valerie
2018.  In Rape Culture, Gender Violence, and Religion, ► pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Kammoun, Raoudha
2015.  In Discourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 63], ► pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Menshawy, Mustafa
2020.  In Leaving the Muslim Brotherhood, ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.