Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 10:2 (2011) ► pp.139159
References (39)
References
Anderson, Benedict. [1983]1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Berlin-Institut. 2009. Ungenutzte Potentiale: Zur Lage der Integration in Deutschland. Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. [URL]Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael. 2008. A nation is a territory with one culture and one language: The role of metaphorical folk models in language policy debates. In: Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds). Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef. 1992. The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics 2(3), 355–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bundesregierung. 2007. Nationaler Integrationsplan: Kurzfassung für die Presse. [URL]
Chilton, Paul and Lakoff, George. 1995. Foreign policy by metaphor. In: Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden (eds). Language and Peace. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 37–59.Google Scholar
Commission des Communautés européennes. 2007. Communication de la Commission au Conseil, au Parlement européen, au Comité économique et social européen et au Comité des Régions: 3e rapport annuel sur la migration et l’intégration. Bruxelles: Commission des Communautés européennes. [URL]Google Scholar
Conseil économique et social. 2006. Pour une politique d’immigration et d’intégration active: Avis. Luxembourg: Conseil économique et social. [URL]Diez, Thomas. 1999. Speaking “Europe”: The politics of integration discourse. Journal of European Public Policy 6(4), 598–613.Google Scholar
European Commission (Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security). 2004. Handbook on Integration for Policy-Makers and Practitioners. Luxembourg: Office des Publications officielles des Communautés européennes. [URL]Google Scholar
Extra, Guus, van Avermaet, Piet and Spotti, Massimiliano (eds). 2009. Language Testing, Migration and Citizenship: Cross-National Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 87–104.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary. 2004. Immigrant incorporation in Western democracies. International Migration Review 38(3), 945–969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Andrew. [2000]2008. Immigration and European Integration: Beyond Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. [1999]2006. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogan-Brun, Gabrielle, Mar-Molinero, Clare and Stevenson, Patrick (eds). 2009. Discourses on Language and Integration: Critical Perspectives on Language Testing Regimes in Europe. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy and Quinn, Naomi (eds). 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horner, Kristine. 2009. Language, citizenship and Europeanization: Unpacking the discourse of integration. In: Gabrielle Hogan-Brun, Clare Mar-Molinero and Patrick Stevenson (eds). Discourses on Language and Integration: Critical Perspectives on Language Testing Regimes in Europe. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Journal (2 May 2008) Von inklusiver Pädagogik bis Verfassungsänderung. Marathon-Sitzung auf Krautmarkt vor dem 1. Mai. p. 3–4.
Levitas, Ruth. 1996. The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy 161, 5–20.
Luxemburger Wort(18 February 2008) “Krönung der Integration”: Chancen und Risiken des Doppelpasses, p. 3.
Luxemburger Wort (12 January 2009) Von Asyl bis Zuwanderung: Gesetzliche Grundlage angepasst. p. 2–3.
Marxer, Veronika. 2008. Fordern und fördern: Perspektiven der liechtensteinischen Integrationspolitik. Vortrag am Liechtenstein-Institut, Bendern. [URL]Google Scholar
Marxer, Wilfried. 2007. Migration und Integration: Geschichte — Probleme — Perspektiven. Arbeitspapiere Liechtenstein-Institut Nr. 8 (Bendern: Liechtenstein-Institut. [URL]Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M.. 2009. At the intersection between power and knowledge: An analysis of a Swedish policy document on language testing for citizenship. Journal of Language and Politics 81, 287–304.
Muehlmann, Shaylih. 2007. Defending diversity: Staking out a common global interest? In: Alexandre Duchêne and Monica Heller (eds). Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum, 14–34.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2002. Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1541, 11–28.
Stråth, Bo. 2006. Future of Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 51, 427–448.
Süssmuth, Rita. 2006. Migration und Integration: Testfall für unsere Gesellschaft. München: dtv Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Unabhängige Kommission “Zuwanderung”. 2001. Zuwanderung gestalten — Integration fördern. Berlin: Druckerei Conrad. [URL]Google Scholar
Wachendorff, Ulrike and Budach, Gabriele. 2003. Die Migrationsdebatte in Deutschland: Pressestimmen zum Bericht der Zuwandererkommission. In: Jürgen Erfurt, Gabriele Budach and Sabine Hofmann (eds). Mehrsprachigkeit und Migration. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 147–163.Google Scholar
Willems, Helmut and Paul Milmeister. 2006. Migration und Integration. In: Wolfgang H. Lorig and Mario Hirsch (eds). Das politische System Luxemburgs: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 62–92.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. [1976]1988. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. The contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory prejudices and stereotypes in the language of politics. In: Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller (eds) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 291–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

de Bres, Julia & Veronika Lovrits
2024. Monolingual cringe and ideologies of English: Anglophone migrants to Luxembourg draw their experiences in a multilingual society. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4  pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Lampropoulou, Sofia, Korina Giaxoglou & Paige Johnson
2024. ‘Hosting refugees is the most rewarding experience’: migrant identity and affective positioning in curated NGO stories. Critical Discourse Studies  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lampropoulou, Sofia & Paige Johnson
2023. ‘[P]aying back to the community and to the British people’: Migration as transactional discourse in curated stories by UK charity organisations. Discourse & Society 34:5  pp. 598 ff. DOI logo
Farashah, Ali Dehghanpour & Tomas Blomquist
2022. Work experiences of qualified immigrants: a review of theoretical progress. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 41:7  pp. 1063 ff. DOI logo
Lovrits, Veronika
2022. Patterns and Variation in English Language Discourse. 9th Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English,  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Vager-Atias, Einat & Michal Krumer-Nevo
2022. ‘The World Is Very Competitive and Cruel, You Won’t Get Any Special Treatment’: Social Work and Youth Policy Discourses in the Neoliberal Era. The British Journal of Social Work 52:3  pp. 1269 ff. DOI logo
Klarenbeek, Lea M.
2019. Relational integration: a response to Willem Schinkel. Comparative Migration Studies 7:1 DOI logo
Klarenbeek, Lea M.
2021. Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’. Migration Studies 9:3  pp. 902 ff. DOI logo
Lamb, Terry, Aniko Hatoss & Shirley O’Neill
2019. Challenging Social Injustice in Superdiverse Contexts Through Activist Languages Education. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lamb, Terry, Aniko Hatoss & Shirley O’Neill
2020. Challenging Social Injustice in Superdiverse Contexts Through Activist Languages Education. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Anjum, Saliha, Chris McVittie & Andrew McKinlay
2018. It is not quite cricket: Muslim immigrants' accounts of integration into UK society. European Journal of Social Psychology 48:1 DOI logo
Weber, Jean-Jacques
2016. Luxembourgish Language-in-Education Policy in Limbo: The Tension Between Ideologies of Authenticity and Anonymity. In Discursive Approaches to Language Policy,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Horner, Kristine
2015. Discourses on Language and Citizenship in Europe. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:5  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Kirkwood, Steve, Andy McKinlay & Chris McVittie
2014. ‘Some People It's Very Difficult to Trust’: Attributions of Agency and Accountability in Practitioners' Talk About Integration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 24:5  pp. 376 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.