Integration has become a keyword across texts and genres, and is often uncritically embraced not only by politicians and journalists but also by academic researchers. In this paper, we explore how integration is used in reference to people categorized as “migrants” or “foreigners”. We discuss intertextual links between a wide range of texts from different European countries, including official policy documents, print media texts and academic publications. We have deliberately chosen liberal and progressive texts rather than the texts of the extreme right, since our objective is to show how even in liberal texts, the use of the concept of integration is frequently informed by illiberal assumptions and ideologies. Our analysis aims to lay bare the cultural or discourse models underlying the use of the concept of integration. We compare and contrast three discourse models of integration, which we have labelled as the centre-periphery, mathematical game and statistical correlations models. We show how one particular text shuttles between models and examine the pernicious consequences of the linguistic choices made in the text. The paper concludes with a call for greater awareness of the potentially discriminatory ideological frameworks within which the term “integration” functions.
Anderson, Benedict. [1983]1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Berlin-Institut. 2009. Ungenutzte Potentiale: Zur Lage der Integration in Deutschland. Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. [URL]
Berthele, Raphael. 2008. A nation is a territory with one culture and one language: The role of metaphorical folk models in language policy debates. In: Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven (eds). Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–331.
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef. 1998. Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
Bundesregierung. 2007. Nationaler Integrationsplan: Kurzfassung für die Presse. [URL]
Chilton, Paul and Lakoff, George. 1995. Foreign policy by metaphor. In: Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden (eds). Language and Peace. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 37–59.
Commission des Communautés européennes. 2007. Communication de la Commission au Conseil, au Parlement européen, au Comité économique et social européen et au Comité des Régions: 3e rapport annuel sur la migration et l’intégration. Bruxelles: Commission des Communautés européennes. [URL]
Conseil économique et social. 2006. Pour une politique d’immigration et d’intégration active: Avis. Luxembourg: Conseil économique et social. [URL]Diez, Thomas. 1999. Speaking “Europe”: The politics of integration discourse. Journal of European Public Policy 6(4), 598–613.
European Commission (Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security). 2004. Handbook on Integration for Policy-Makers and Practitioners. Luxembourg: Office des Publications officielles des Communautés européennes. [URL]
Extra, Guus, van Avermaet, Piet and Spotti, Massimiliano (eds). 2009. Language Testing, Migration and Citizenship: Cross-National Perspectives. London: Continuum.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 87–104.
Freeman, Gary. 2004. Immigrant incorporation in Western democracies. International Migration Review 38(3), 945–969.
Geddes, Andrew. [2000]2008. Immigration and European Integration: Beyond Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Gee, James Paul. [1999]2006. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
Journal (2 May 2008) Von inklusiver Pädagogik bis Verfassungsänderung. Marathon-Sitzung auf Krautmarkt vor dem 1. Mai. p. 3–4.
Levitas, Ruth. 1996. The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy 161, 5–20.
Luxemburger Wort(18 February 2008) “Krönung der Integration”: Chancen und Risiken des Doppelpasses, p. 3.
Luxemburger Wort (12 January 2009) Von Asyl bis Zuwanderung: Gesetzliche Grundlage angepasst. p. 2–3.
Marxer, Veronika. 2008. Fordern und fördern: Perspektiven der liechtensteinischen Integrationspolitik. Vortrag am Liechtenstein-Institut, Bendern. [URL]
Marxer, Wilfried. 2007. Migration und Integration: Geschichte — Probleme — Perspektiven. Arbeitspapiere Liechtenstein-Institut Nr. 8 (Bendern: Liechtenstein-Institut. [URL]
Milani, Tommaso M.. 2009. At the intersection between power and knowledge: An analysis of a Swedish policy document on language testing for citizenship. Journal of Language and Politics 81, 287–304.
Muehlmann, Shaylih. 2007. Defending diversity: Staking out a common global interest? In: Alexandre Duchêne and Monica Heller (eds). Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum, 14–34.
Pennycook, Alastair. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.
Pennycook, Alastair. 2002. Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1541, 11–28.
Stråth, Bo. 2006. Future of Europe. Journal of Language and Politics 51, 427–448.
Süssmuth, Rita. 2006. Migration und Integration: Testfall für unsere Gesellschaft. München: dtv Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
Wachendorff, Ulrike and Budach, Gabriele. 2003. Die Migrationsdebatte in Deutschland: Pressestimmen zum Bericht der Zuwandererkommission. In: Jürgen Erfurt, Gabriele Budach and Sabine Hofmann (eds). Mehrsprachigkeit und Migration. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 147–163.
Willems, Helmut and Paul Milmeister. 2006. Migration und Integration. In: Wolfgang H. Lorig and Mario Hirsch (eds). Das politische System Luxemburgs: eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 62–92.
Williams, Raymond. [1976]1988. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. The contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory prejudices and stereotypes in the language of politics. In: Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller (eds) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 291–315.
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
de Bres, Julia & Veronika Lovrits
2024. Monolingual cringe and ideologies of English: Anglophone migrants to Luxembourg draw their experiences in a multilingual society. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4 ► pp. 775 ff.
Lampropoulou, Sofia, Korina Giaxoglou & Paige Johnson
2024. ‘Hosting refugees is the most rewarding experience’: migrant identity and affective positioning in curated NGO stories. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
Lampropoulou, Sofia & Paige Johnson
2023. ‘[P]aying back to the community and to the British people’: Migration as transactional discourse in curated stories by UK charity organisations. Discourse & Society 34:5 ► pp. 598 ff.
Farashah, Ali Dehghanpour & Tomas Blomquist
2022. Work experiences of qualified immigrants: a review of theoretical progress. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 41:7 ► pp. 1063 ff.
Lovrits, Veronika
2022. Patterns and Variation in English Language Discourse. 9th Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English, ► pp. 59 ff.
Vager-Atias, Einat & Michal Krumer-Nevo
2022. ‘The World Is Very Competitive and Cruel, You Won’t Get Any Special Treatment’: Social Work and Youth Policy Discourses in the Neoliberal Era. The British Journal of Social Work 52:3 ► pp. 1269 ff.
Klarenbeek, Lea M.
2019. Relational integration: a response to Willem Schinkel. Comparative Migration Studies 7:1
Klarenbeek, Lea M.
2021. Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’. Migration Studies 9:3 ► pp. 902 ff.
Lamb, Terry, Aniko Hatoss & Shirley O’Neill
2019. Challenging Social Injustice in Superdiverse Contexts Through Activist Languages Education. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education, ► pp. 1 ff.
Lamb, Terry, Aniko Hatoss & Shirley O’Neill
2020. Challenging Social Injustice in Superdiverse Contexts Through Activist Languages Education. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education, ► pp. 33 ff.
Anjum, Saliha, Chris McVittie & Andrew McKinlay
2018. It is not quite cricket: Muslim immigrants' accounts of integration into UK society. European Journal of Social Psychology 48:1
Weber, Jean-Jacques
2016. Luxembourgish Language-in-Education Policy in Limbo: The Tension Between Ideologies of Authenticity and Anonymity. In Discursive Approaches to Language Policy, ► pp. 183 ff.
Horner, Kristine
2015. Discourses on Language and Citizenship in Europe. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:5 ► pp. 209 ff.
Kirkwood, Steve, Andy McKinlay & Chris McVittie
2014. ‘Some People It's Very Difficult to Trust’: Attributions of Agency and Accountability in Practitioners' Talk About Integration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 24:5 ► pp. 376 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.