Critique and argumentation
On the relation between the discourse-historical approach and pragma-dialectics
Bernhard Forchtner | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ana Tominc | Lancaster University
At the core of critical discourse analysis lies its emancipatory agenda: arguing for social equality and against discrimination. In the case of the discourse-historical approach (DHA), this stance has been theoretically justified mainly through references to Habermas’ language-philosophy. At the same time, the analysis of actually occurring argumentative speech requires more than a theoretical underpinning of one’s critique and, here, DHA has benefitted from drawing on van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s Pragma-Dialectical argumentation theory. However, Pragma-Dialectics is not just a tool kit but rests on Popper and Albert’s critical rationalism. This results in both epistemological as well as normative conflicts at the paradigm-core of DHA between critical rationalism and Habermas’ critical theory regarding the concept of critique. In this article, we review the different epistemological and normative underpinnings of DHA and Pragma-Dialectics and discuss the consequences of implementing the latter in the former. We conclude by arguing for a coherent orientation towards Habermas’ language-philosophy in order to maintain a high degree of consistency in DHA.
Keywords: critique, critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach, pragma-dialectics, critical rationalism, Münchhausen-trilemma, Jürgen Habermas
Published online: 22 March 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
References
Alexy, Robert
Apel, Karl-Otto
Biro, John and Siegel, Harvey
2006 Pragma-Dialectics versus epistemological theories of arguing and arguments: rivals or partners. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 1—10.
Blair, Anthony J
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth
Forchtner, Bernhard
Garssen, Bart and van Laar, Jan Albert
Habermas, Jürgen
Hacohen, Malachi Haim
Rehg, William
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
Siegel, Harvey and Biro, John
van Dijk, Teun A
van Eemeren, Frans H
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart and Meuffels, Bert
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
Agbozo, G. Edzordzi, Mary Edward & Fatiatu Inusah
Efe, Ibrahim & Bernhard Forchtner
Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski & Ruth Wodak
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christoffer Kølvraa
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christian Schneickert
Gachigua, Sammy Gakero
Hansson, Sten
Herzog, Benno
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
Põiklik, Pille
Roderick, Ian
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
Wodak, Ruth
Wodak, Ruth & Bernhard Forchtner
Zienkowski, Jan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.