Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:1 (2012) ► pp. 31–50

Critique and argumentation

On the relation between the discourse-historical approach and pragma-dialectics

| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| Lancaster University
At the core of critical discourse analysis lies its emancipatory agenda: arguing for social equality and against discrimination. In the case of the discourse-historical approach (DHA), this stance has been theoretically justified mainly through references to Habermas’ language-philosophy. At the same time, the analysis of actually occurring argumentative speech requires more than a theoretical underpinning of one’s critique and, here, DHA has benefitted from drawing on van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s Pragma-Dialectical argumentation theory. However, Pragma-Dialectics is not just a tool kit but rests on Popper and Albert’s critical rationalism. This results in both epistemological as well as normative conflicts at the paradigm-core of DHA between critical rationalism and Habermas’ critical theory regarding the concept of critique. In this article, we review the different epistemological and normative underpinnings of DHA and Pragma-Dialectics and discuss the consequences of implementing the latter in the former. We conclude by arguing for a coherent orientation towards Habermas’ language-philosophy in order to maintain a high degree of consistency in DHA.
Keywords: critique, critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach, pragma-dialectics, critical rationalism, Münchhausen-trilemma, Jürgen Habermas
Published online: 22 March 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
References
Adorno, Theodor W
1976 The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Albert, Hans
1968 Traktat über kritische Vernunft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert
2010 A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto
1980 The a priori of the communication community and the foundation of ethics: the problem of a rational foundation of ethics in the scientific age. In: Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 225—300.Google Scholar
Austin, John L
1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biro, John and Siegel, Harvey
2006 Pragma-Dialectics versus epistemological theories of arguing and arguments: rivals or partners. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 1—10.Google Scholar
Blair, Anthony J
2006 Pragma-Dialectics and pragma-dialectics. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 11—22.Google Scholar
Corvi, Roberta
1997 An Introduction to the Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258—284.Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard
2011 Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (1), 1—14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garssen, Bart and van Laar, Jan Albert
2010 A Pragma-Dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Informal Logic 30 (2), 122—141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1972 Wahrheitstheorien. In: 1984. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 127—183.Google Scholar
1976 What is universal pragmatics? In: 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann, 1—68.Google Scholar
1983 Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press, 43—115.Google Scholar
1984 The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
1991 Remarks on discourse ethics. In: 1993. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 19—111.Google Scholar
1997 Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1998 Hermeneutic and analytic philosophy: two complementary versions of the linguistic turn. In: 2005. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: MIT Press, 51—81.Google Scholar
2008 Communicative reason and the detranscendentalized “Use of Reason”. In: Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press. 24—76.Google Scholar
Hacohen, Malachi Haim
2002 Karl Popper. The Formative years, 1902—1945. Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl
1962a The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume I. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
1962b The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rehg, William
2001 Adjusting the pragmatic turn: ethnomethodology and critical argumentation theory. In: William Rehg and James Bohman (eds). Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn. The Transformation of Critical Theory. Essays in Honour of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 115—143.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009 The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 87—121.Google Scholar
Siegel, Harvey and Biro, John
2008 Rationality, reasonabless, and critical rationalism: problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation 221, 191—203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2010 Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A
2008 Critical Discourse Analysis and nominalization. Discourse & Society 19 (6), 821—828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob
1988 Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2 (2), 271—291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1994 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart and Meuffels, Bert
2009 Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A
2002 Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah/New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott
1993 Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1968 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
2009 Critical discourse analysis. History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 1—33.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1996 Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001 What CDA is about — a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London. Sage, 1—13.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Agbozo, G. Edzordzi, Mary Edward & Fatiatu Inusah
2019.  In Music and Messaging in the African Political Arena [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Efe, Ibrahim & Bernhard Forchtner
2015. ‘Saying sorry’ in Turkey. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 233 ff. Crossref logo
Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski & Ruth Wodak
2013.  In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ► pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christoffer Kølvraa
2012. Narrating a ‘new Europe’: From ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness?. Discourse & Society 23:4 ► pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christian Schneickert
2016. Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
Gachigua, Sammy Gakero
2016.  In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ], ► pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Hansson, Sten
2015. Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society 26:3 ► pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Herzog, Benno
2016.  In Discourse Analysis as Social Critique, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Herzog, Benno
2016. Discourse analysis as immanent critique: Possibilities and limits of normative critique in empirical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 278 ff. Crossref logo
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2016. Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 308 ff. Crossref logo
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner
2016. Theories and concepts in critical discourse studies: Facing challenges, moving beyond foundations. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Kutter, Amelie
2020.  In Legitimation in the European Union, ► pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2016. Fissures in the discourse-scape: Critique, rationality and validity in post-foundational approaches to CDS. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 262 ff. Crossref logo
Põiklik, Pille
2016. People’s right to keep and bear arms. Journal of Language and Politics 15:2 ► pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Rheindorf, Markus
2019.  In Revisiting the Toolbox of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Roderick, Ian
2018. Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 15:2 ► pp. 154 ff. Crossref logo
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2022. Sailing to Ithaka . Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 344 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff. Crossref logo
Wodak, Ruth
2015. Saying the unsayable. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Wodak, Ruth & Bernhard Forchtner
2014. Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: right-wing populism, collective memory and the fictionalisation of politics. Visual Communication 13:2 ► pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Zienkowski, Jan
2017.  In Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse, ► pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Zienkowski, Jan
2017. Reflexivity in the transdisciplinary field of critical discourse studies. Palgrave Communications 3:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.