Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:3 (2012) ► pp.448–467

The “National Left” in Israeli public discourse

A critique

| University of Bristol
In 2000 the leftist camp in Israel experienced a crisis of meaning and identity. This was the result of the failure of the 2000 Camp David Talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The atmosphere that emerged amongst the Israeli left was one of despair and disillusion, a void of meaning. Recently, however, a new Zionist “national left” discourse emerged, which refutes the idea of peace and reconstructs the ideology of the Israeli left. This paper engages critically with this discourse by deploying a discourse analytical approach, as it draws on Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s theory of hegemony as well as semantic analysis, specifically the use of “semantic fields” and “semantic networks”. This paper looks at a variety of public texts, which are exemplary of the “national left” discourse in Israel.
Keywords: Left, Israel, Semantic Analysis, Hegemony, Discourse Analysis, Zionism
Published online: 26 November 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.3.07man
References (60)
References
Ben-Ami, Shlomo. 2006. Scars of War, Wounds of Peace: The Israeli-Arab Tragedy. New-York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minnesota: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Time is Broken. The Return of the Past in the Response to September 11.” Theory and Event [online] 5 (4). Accessed May 10, 2010. htt://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.4campbell.html#_edn3
Corson, David. 1995. Using English Words. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10 (2): 126—155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 2004. “Laclu and Hegemony: Some (post) Hegelian Caveats.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Simon Critchley and Oliver, 35—53. Marchart, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Doty, Roxanne L. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. CounterinsurgencyPolicyinthePhilippines.” InternationalStudiesQuarterly 37 (3):297—320.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Ghanem, As’ad., Rouhana Nadim, and Yiftachel Oren. 1998. “Questioning “Ethnic Democracy”: A Response to Sammy Smooha.” Israel Studies 3 (2): 253—267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebook. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New-York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies, and Social Change, ed. by David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis, 1—23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1982. “God and the Jouissance of the Woman.” In Feminine Sexuality, ed. by Juliet Mitchell and Jacqueline Rose, 137—148. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glimpsing the Future.” In Laclau: A Critical Reader, ed. by Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 279—328. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau,Ernesto. 2006.“IdeologyandPost-Marxism.” JournalofPoliticalIdeologies 11 (2):103—114.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1974. Semantic Field and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam and New-York: North Holland,Google Scholar
. 1985. “The Influence of Semantic Fields on Semantic Change.” In Historical Semantics:HistoricalWord-Formation,ed.byJacek Fisiak,283—296.N.Y.:MoutonPublishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. “Research and Methods: The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” EJIR 5 (2): 225—254.Google Scholar
Morris, Benny. 2004. The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nabers, Dirk. 2009. “Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2): 191—214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pappé, Illan. 2007. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1955. “Pragmatism in Retrospect: A Last Formulation.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. by Justus Buchler, 269—289. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Rachamim, Yechezkel (ed.). 2005. There is No One to Talk To. In Hebrew. Tel-Aviv University: Chaim Herzog Institute.Google Scholar
Ross, Dennis. 2005. The Missing Peace: The Inside Story of the Fight for Middle East Peace. New-York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Amnon, and Alexander Yakobson. 2009. Israel and the Family of Nations: The Jewish Nation-State and Human Rights. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Danni (ed.). 2003. What Really Happened There? In Hebrew. Tel-Aviv: Yedioth-Ahronoth.Google Scholar
Ruitenberg, Claudia. 2010. “Conflict, Affect and the Political: On Disagreement as Democratic Capacity.” In Factis Pax 4 (1): 40—55.Google Scholar
De-Saussure, Ferdinand. 1990. Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert. 1980. “Language, Narrative, and Anti-Narrative.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1): 204—212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shavit, Ari. 2001. The Day in which the Peace Died. Haaretz online, 14 September. In Hebrew. Accessed May 01, 2010. http://www.7th-day.co.il/mehumot/hayom.htm
. 2010. A New Zionist Left. Haaretz online, 4 March. Accessed May 01, 2010. htt://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/a-new-zionist-left-1.264113.
Shenhav, Yehouda. 2006. The Arab Jews: A Postcolonial Reading of Nationalism, Religion, and Ethnicity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smooha, Sammy. 2002. “The Model of Ethnic Democracy: Israel and a Jewish and Democratic State.” Nations and Nationalism 8 (4): 475—503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sofer, Arnon. 2006a. “Evict to Save Home”. Yedioth Ahronoth, 24 January. In Hebrew. Accessed November 7, 2010. http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3205331,00.html
. 2006b. “Realignment or Perishing”. Yedioth Ahronoth, 14 September. In Hebrew. Accessed November 7, 2010. http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3302109,00.html
. 2010. Demography and the Future of the Relationships of Israel and the Palestinian. In Hebrew. Haifa: Chaikin Geo-strategy Chair.Google Scholar
Solms, Marc. 2002. “What is Affect?” In Unconscious Mental Life and Reality, ed. by Richard Ekins, 45—82. London: J. Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Sowa, John F. 2006. Semantic Networks. Accessed May 01, 2010. htt://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/semnet.htm. DOI logo
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2004. “Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253—267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Gadi. 2001. “Israel, Palestine and Territorial Partition”. Dissent online. Accessed July 01, 2010. htt://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=1205
. 2003. “The Results are in, and Peace Lost.” The New York Times, 29 November. Accessed August 29, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/29/opinion/the-results-arein-and-peace-lost.html
Taub, Gaddi. 2008. “Narcissism and Moral Opaqueness.” Ma’arive online, 6 July. Accessed August 24, 2010. http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART1/755/966.html
Taub, Gadi. 2010a. What is Zionism. In Hebrew. Tel Aviv: Yedioth Ahronoth Press.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Back to Unilateralism.” Yedioth Ahronoth, 25 August. In Hebrew. Accessed November 09, 2010. http://www.gaditaub.com/eblog/back-to-unilateralism/
Townshend, Jules. 2004. “Laclau and Mouffe’s Hegemonic Project: The Story So Far.” Political Studies 52 (2): 269—288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Stephen. 1962. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van-Dijk, Teun A. 1997. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Wæver, O. 1995. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On security, ed. by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, pp. 46—86. Columbia: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta. 1996. “Constructing National Interests.” EJIR 2 (3): 275—318.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2008. “The Joy of Moral Preaching: A Review of Jacqueline Rose, The Question of Zion.” Katharsis, 81. In Hebrew. Accessed August 29, 2010. http://www.katharsis.co.il/article.asp?ArticleID=49
. 2010. “A Bi-National State? Here?” Haaretz, 29 January. In Hebrew. Accessed November 07, 2010. http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/1146003.html
Yaniv, Eldad, and Shmuel Hasfari. 2009. The National Manifesto. In Hebrew. Accessed June 26, 2012. http://pdf.smoleumi.org.il/
Yemini, Ben-Dror. 2010. “Who is a leftist?” Ma’arive online, 6 February. In Hebrew. Accessed May 01, 2010. htt://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/050/546.html
Yiftachel, Oren, 1998. “Ethnocracy: The Politics of Judaising Israel/Palestine.” Constellations: International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 6 (3): 364—390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Nwankwo, Cletus Famous
2021. Discursive construction of the farmer-pastoralist conflict in Nigeria. Open Political Science 4:1 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Moran M.
2014. The Gellnerian modality revisited: towards a ‘genealogy’ of cultural homogenization and nation-state congruency. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37:11 ► pp. 2014 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Moran M.
2018. ‘I’m a proud Israeli’: Homonationalism, belonging and the insecurity of the Jewish-Israeli body national. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 23:2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Moran M.
2020. The Nation/State Fantasy: From Gellner to Lacan. In The Nation/State Fantasy, ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Moran M.
2020. Introduction: Problematising the Present. In The Nation/State Fantasy, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.