Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 12:1 (2013) ► pp.1–28
“Grab a pen and paper”
Interaction v. interactivity in a political radio phone-in
In this paper we analyse the discursive frameworks for interaction in a UK political radio phone-in between 2001 and 2010, and the implications of those frameworks for public engagement with politicians. The BBC Radio 4 phone-in program Election Call, broadcast in the run-up to a general election, has experimented with ‘new’ interactive technology (TV simulcast, web broadcasting and e-mail) in its attempt to provide listeners with the opportunity to engage with politicians and political parties live on air. By 2010 however, the program had returned to the original ‘old’ media format of telephone interaction only. Building on previous research in the discourse of radio phone-in broadcasts (Hutchby 1996; Thornborrow 2001a, 2001b, 2002; Hester & Fitzgerald 1999; Fitzgerald & Housley 2002; Thornborrow & Fitzgerald 2002), our analysis focuses on the empirical implementation of the 2010 shift in editorial policy which explicitly invited callers to engage with issues rather than just giving opinions. We will argue that while interactivity may broaden access to democratic debate, it is through live interaction that callers are best able to challenge politicians and hold them to account.
References (30)
Clayman, Steven. 1992. “Footing in the achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. By P. Drew, and J. Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2004. “Arenas of Interaction in the Mediated Public Sphere.” Poetics 32 (1): 29–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2003.12.003. 
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623.
Clayman, Steven, John Heritage, Marc Elliott, and Laurie McDonald. 2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark?: Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 72 (1): 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102.
Coleman, Stephen. 2002. “Election Call 2001. How politicians and the public interacted.” Parliamentary Affairs 551: 731–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.4.731.
Edwards, Derek. 2000. “Extreme Case Formulations: Softeners, Investment, and Doing Nonliteral.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 347–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_01.
Ferenčík, Milan. 2007. “Exercising Politeness: Membership Categorisation in a Radio Phone-in Programme.” Pragmatics 17 (3): 351–370.
Fitzgerald, Richard. 2007. “An Initial Investigation into the Role of Talkback in Hong Kong and Singapore.” Media International Australia 1241: 87–96.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley. 2002. “Identity, Categorisation and Sequential Organ-isation: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse and Society 13 (5): 579–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275.
. 2007. “Talkback Community and the Public Sphere.” Media International Australia 1221: 150–163.
Goffman, Erving. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Greatbatch, David. 1988. “A Turn Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17 (3): 401–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963.
Hester, Stephen, and Richard Fitzgerald. 1999. “Category, Predicate and Contrast: Some Organ-isational Features in a Radio Talk Show.” In Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis No 5. Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches, ed. By P. Jalbert, 171–194. Maryland, Oxford: University Press of America.
Hutchby, Ian. (1996). Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004009
. 2001. “‘Witnessing’: The Use of First-Hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio.” Discourse Studies 3 (4): 481–497.
Lawrence, Jon. 2009. “The hustings, broadcasters and the future of British democracy.” http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-86.html#S3 (accessed 7/02/2011).
McNair, Brian, Matthew Hibberd, and Philip Schlesinger. 2002. “Public Access Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics.” Journalism Studies 3 (3): 407–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700220145623.
Montgomery, Martin. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routedge.
Myers, Greg. (2004). Matters of Opinion: Talking about Public Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486708.
Guardian Media, 2009. More Questions than Answers, interview with Nick Clarke. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/may/09/generalelection2005.broadcasting (accessed 02/05/2011).
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Jean M. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, Jonathan. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
Ross, Karen. 2004. “Political Talk Radio and Democratic Participation: Caller Perspectives on Election Call.” Media, Culture and Society 26 (6): 785–801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443704045509.
Thornborrow, Joanna, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2002. “From Problematic Object to Routine ‘Add-On’: Dealing with E-mails in Radio Phone-ins.” Discourse Studies 4 (2): 201–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020501.
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2001a. “Questions, Control and the Organisation of Talk in Calls to a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse Studies 3 (1): 119–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004008.
. 2001b. “Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasting.” Discourse Studies 3 (4): 459–479.
. (2002). Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Pearson Education.
Tolson, Andrew. (2006). Media Talk. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ward, Ian. 2002. “Talkback Radio, Political Communication, and Australian Politics.” Australian Journal of Communication 291: 21–38.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Mohd Nor, Siti Nurbaya
2021. Constructing ethnic and national identities in talk on Malaysian issues. Discourse & Society 32:1 ► pp. 3 ff. 
Zanettin, Federico
2021. News Media Translation,
Pinatih, Anisa
2020. Third turn position in British election phone-in conversations. Text & Talk 40:3 ► pp. 325 ff.
Burger, Marcel & Richard Fitzgerald
2019. Good Professional Reasons for Bad Journalism Practice: Inventing Audience Contributions in a Live Tv Debate. Journalism Practice 13:10 ► pp. 1185 ff.
Thornborrow, Joanna
2018. Hybrid Politics: Media and Participation. European Journal of Communication 33:5 ► pp. 569 ff.
Fitzgerald, Richard & Joanna Thornborrow
Ekström, Mats & Ulla Moberg
2015. ‘Welcome to participate!’: Host activities and caller’s position in Swedish election campaign phone-ins in the 1970s and the 2000s. Journalism 16:5 ► pp. 654 ff.
Stremlau, Nicole, Emanuele Fantini & Iginio Gagliardone
2015. Patronage, politics and performance: radio call-in programmes and the myth of accountability. Third World Quarterly 36:8 ► pp. 1510 ff.
Ekström, Mats & Göran Eriksson
2013. Citizen Participation in Journalist Discourse: Multiplatform Political Interviews in the Swedish Election Campaign 2010. In Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ► pp. 181 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.