Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:1 (2013) ► pp.126146
Ackelsberg, Martha A
(2010) Resisting Citizenship. Feminist Essays on Politics, Community and Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah
1969“Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, ed. by I. Berlin, 118–172. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2006“Language Policy and National Identity.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by T. Ricento, 238–254. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bowers, Chet A
(1987) Elements of a Post-Liberal Theory of Education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Eleanor
2006A new Welsh language policy for the Welsh Liberal Democrats. Retrieved from .
Christman, John
2005“Saving Positive Freedom.” Political Theory 331: 79–88. Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
(1972) The Archeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gray, John
(1986) Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky
(2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Howe, Kenneth R
(1997) Understanding Equal Educational Opportunity: Social Justice, Democracy, and Schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert, and Richard Baldauf
(1997) Language Planning: From Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will
(1989) Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(2008) The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. New York: The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L
(1995) Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Locke, John
2000Two Treatises of Government. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought.Google Scholar
May, Stephen
(2008) Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kai
(1985) Equality and Liberty: A Defense of Radical Egalitarianism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert
(1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gassett, Jose
(1932) Revolt of the Masses. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Petrovic, John E
2001“Educational Policy and Nationalism: Dewey on Balancing Cultural and Political Communities.” Insights 34 (2): 4–10.Google Scholar
2006“Linguistic Human Rights and the (Post)liberal Conundra of Dialect and Language.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Studies Association, Spokane, Washington.
2011“The Civics of Language Diversity: Human Rights, Citizenship, and English-Only.” In Critical Civic Literacy: A Reader, ed. by J. Devitis, 393–404. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R
(1989) Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists’ Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar
1993“The Uses of Folk Linguistics.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (2): 181–259. Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy, and Dennis R. Preston
2009“Folk Linguistics.” In The New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. by N. Coupland, and A. Jaworski, 356–373. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rawls, John
(2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael
(1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove
(2000) Linguistic Genocide in Education – Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2004“Do Not Cut My Tongue, Let Me Live and Die with My Language.” A comment on English and other languages in relation to linguistic human rights. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 3 (2): 127–134. Google Scholar
Stroud, Christopher
2010“A Postliberal Critique of Language Rights: Toward a Politics of Language for a Linguistics of Contact.” In International Perspectives on Bilingual Education: Policy, Practice, and Controversy, ed. by J. E. Petrovic, 191–217. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Carlin, Patrick
2015. Where were you, our friends on the inside? Language and contestation in Northern Ireland. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015:235 DOI logo
Hamid, M. Obaidul
2016. John E. Petrovic: A Post-Liberal Approach to Language Policy in Education. Language Policy 15:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
2019. Interrogating micro language planning from LPP students’ perspectives. European Journal of Language Policy 11:1  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Trang Thi Thuy
2019. Vietnamese ethnic minority students’ language practices under the influence of external interventions: A management perspective. Language in Society 48:5  pp. 745 ff. DOI logo
Oakes, Leigh
2017. Normative language policy and minority language rights: rethinking the case of regional languages in France. Language Policy 16:4  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Odugu, Desmond Ikenna
2017. Linguistic Diversity and Education. In Re-thinking Postcolonial Education in Sub-Saharan Africa in the 21st Century,  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Petrovic, John E.
2019. Alienation, Language Work, and the So-Called Commodification of Language. In Language Politics and Policies,  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Sonntag, Selma K.
2019. The Liberal Tradition in America. In Language Politics and Policies,  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Tran, Hao
2019. Teacher agency in times of educational change: the case of transitioned teachers in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning 20:5  pp. 544 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.