This qualitative case study investigates dissent in the news discourse of a major pro-reform newspaper covering the Iranian presidential election debates that took place in June 2009. Drawing on appraisal theory as its analytical lens, the article examines the evaluation of the three major candidates in the paper’s coverage of the debates. The article begins with the broader sociopolitical context situating the watershed debates and a description of the legal framework within which the Iranian press operate. The analysis next details the function of attitudinal resources in the discursive representation of the political actors. As central to an ideologically invested strategy, evaluative linguistic resources are found to sharply dichotomize the political actors along a range of positive and negative value positions that dissent from those advanced in the narratives of the dominant power.
Arjomand, Said Amir. (1988). The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arjomand, Said Amir. (2006). After Khomeini: Iran Under his Successors. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atton, Chris. 2002. “News Cultures and New Social Movements: Radical Journalism and the Mainstream Media.”Journalism Studies 3 (4): 491–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209.
Bayat, Mangol. 2000. Mysticism and Dissent: Socioreligious Thought in Qajar Iran. Syracuse University Press.
Chilton, Paul, and Lakoff, George. 1995. “Foreign Policy by Metaphor.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schäffner, and Anita Wenden, 35–61. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner. 1997. “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 206–230. London: Sage.
Dabashi, Hamid. 2000. “The End of Islamic Ideology.”Social Research 67 (2): 475–518.
Dabashi, Hamid. (2007). Iran: A People Interrupted. New York: The New Press.
Ehteshami, Anoushiravan, and Mahjoob Zweiri. (2007). Iran and the Rise of Its Neoconservatives: The Politics of Tehran’s Silent Revolution. London: I. B. Tauris.
Erjavec, Karmen. 2001. “Media Representation of the Discrimination Against the Roma in Eastern Europe: The Case of Slovenia.”Discourse & Society 12 (6): 699–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006001.
Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2). Discourse and Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Fozdar, Farida. 2008. “Duelling Discourses, Shared Weapons: Rhetorical Techniques Used to Challenge Racist Arguments.”Discourse & Society 19 (4): 529–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508089942.
Franklin, Bob, Martin Hamer, Mark Hanna, Marie Kinsey, and John E. Richardon. (2005). Key Concepts in Journalism Studies. London: Sage.
Hall, Stauart. 1997. “The Spectacle of the ‘Other’.” In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, ed. by Stauart Hall, 223–279. London: Sage.
Harding, Robert. 2006. “Historical Representations of Aboriginal People in the Canadian News Media.”Discourse & Society 17 (2): 205–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058059.
Harter, Lynn M., Autumn Edwards, Andrea McClanahan, Mark C. Hopson, and Evelyn Carson-Stern. 2004. “Organizing for Survival and Social Change: The Case of Streetwise.”Communication Studies 55 (2): 407–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388627
Hull, Kathleen E. 2001. “The Political Limits of the Rights Frame: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Hawaii.”Sociological Perspectives 44 (2): 207–232.
Jahanbegloo, Ramin (ed.). (2004). Iran between Tradition and Modernity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Jullian, Paula M. 2011. “Appraising through Someone Else’s Words: The Evaluative Power of Quotations in News Reports.”Discourse & Society 22 (6): 766–780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926511411697
Katouzian, Homa. (2007). Iranian History and Politics: The Dialectic of State and Society. London: Routledge.
Keddie, Nikki R. 2006. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keshavarz, Mohammad H. 1988. “Forms of Address in Post-Revolutionary Iranian Persian: A Sociolinguistic Analysis.”Language in Society 171: 565–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013105
Khiabany, Gholam. 2003. The Iranian Press, State, and Civil Society. In Media, Culture, and Society in Iran, ed. by Mehdi Semati, 17–36. London: Routledge.
Khiabany, Gholam. (2010). Iranian Media: The Paradox Modernity. London: Taylor & Francis.
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2009. “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers During the Balkan Conflict (1999). and the British General Election (2005).”Discourse & Society 20 (4): 477–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Lazarus, Richard. 1991. “Cognition and Motivation in Emotion.”American Psychologist 461: 362–367.
Luke, Allen. 2002. “Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis.”Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 221: 96–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000053
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2007. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourse by Reframing the Issues.”Critical Approaches to Discourse across Disciplines 1 (1): 74–94.
Martin, James R. 1997. Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters. In Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Frances Christie, and James. R. Martin, 3–39. London: Cassell.
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoffrey Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, James R. 2004. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change.”Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 491: 179–200.
Martin, Jame R., and David Rose. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
Miller, Vincent. 2005. “Intertextuality, the Referential Illusion and the Production of a Gay Ghetto.”Social and Cultural Geography 6 (1): 61–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1464936052000335973
Nasr, Vali. (2007). The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam will Shape the Future. New York: W. W. Norton.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, John E. 2008. (Mis)representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Press. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Riggins, Stephen H. 1997. “The Rhetoric of Othering.” In The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, ed. by Stephen H. Riggins, 1–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sadri, Mahmoud, and Ahmad Sadri. 2008. “Three Faces of Dissent: Cognitive, Expressive and Traditionalist Discourses of Discontent in Contemporary Iran.” In Iran in the 21st Century: Politics, Economics and Confrontation, ed. by Homa Katouzian, and Hossein Shahidi, 63–85. London: Routledge.
Shahidi, Hossien. (2007). Journalism in Iran: From Mission to Profession. London: Routledge.
Sharifian, Farzad. 2009. “Figurative Language in International Political Discourse: The Case of Iran.”Journal of Language and Politics 8 (3): 416–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.04sha
“The Unclear Number of Casualties in the Recent Events” (2 November 2009). Sarmayeh Newspaper, <http://www.sarmayeh.net/ShowNews.php?56551> (accessed 10 November 2009) [License revoked on 4 November 2009].
Tileaga, Cristian. 2005. “Accounting for Extreme Prejudice and Legitimating Blame in the Talk about the Romanies.”Discourse & Society 16 (5): 603–624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926505054938
van Dijk, Teun A. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weber, Max. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak. 2003. “Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 1–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, Peter R. R. 1997. “Death, Disruption and Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass Media ‘Hard News’ Reporting.” In Genre and Institutions, ed. by Frances Christie, and James R. Martin, 101–133. London: Continuum.
White, Peter, R. R. 2006. “Evaluative Semantics and Ideological Positioning in Journalistic Discourse”. In Image and Ideology in the Mass Media, ed. by Inger Lassen, 45–73. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is about – a Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–13. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 1995. “Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual, ed. by Jef Verschuren, Jan-Ola Ostman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 204–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer (eds). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Wan, Yau Ni
2024. Graduation Resources in News Discourse: Calls for the British Museum to Return Chinese Cultural Artefacts. Journalism and Media 5:1 ► pp. 189 ff.
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff.
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.