In 1992, the Slovenian Ministry of Interior Affairs deprived 25,000 ex-Yugoslavians of their citizenship. This symbolic act of violence is the most severe symptom of the Slovenian transition towards democracy. Since 1995 this group of erased citizens is known as the Erased of Slovenia. This contribution is a critical analysis of political discourses on the issue of the Erased that appeared in the Slovenian printed press between 1995 and 2008. The presented qualitative analysis explores 312 units of op-ed articles, mainly commentaries and editorials, which have been selected on the basis of two keywords: erased, erasure. The contribution aims to show that the notion of the Erased functioned as the “nodal point” around which two antagonistic political discourses were formed. The aim of the analysis is to find out which empty or hegemonic signifiers are produced in this antagonistic relation and how this affects the political desubjectivation of the Erased.
Agamben, Giorgio. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. (2003). Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michael. (1971). The Archeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. New York: Phanteon Books.
Fowler, Roger. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Laclau, Ernesto. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Langer, John. (1998). Tabloid Television. Popular Journalism and the “Other News”. London: Routledge.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. “The Heart of the European Body Politic. British and German Perspectives on Europe’s Central Organ.”Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25 (5&6): 437–452.
Rancière, Jacques. 1995. “Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization.” In The Identity in Question, ed. by John Rajchman, 63–72. London: Routledge.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. “Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?”The South Atlantic Quarterly 103 (2/3): 297–310.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Richardson, E. John. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Todorova, Maria. (1997). Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett, 21–63. London: Blackwell.
Vezovnik, Andreja. (2009). Diskurz. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
2020. EXITitis in Europe? Yugoslavia as the First European Disunion. Ethnologia Europaea 50:2
Hellegren, Z. Isadora
2017. A history of crypto-discourse: encryption as a site of struggles to define internet freedom. Internet Histories 1:4 ► pp. 285 ff.
Jontes, Dejan
2017. Med distanciranostjo in angažiranostjo: protislovja poročanja o »begunski krizi« v dnevnem tisku. Two Homelands :45
Hellegren, Isadora
2016. Deciphering Crypto-Discourse: Articulations of Internet Freedom in Relation to the State. SSRN Electronic Journal
Luthar, Breda & Andreja Trdina
2015. Nation, Gender, Class: Celebrity Culture and the Performance of Identity in the Balkans. Slavic Review 74:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Luthar, Breda & Andreja Trdina
2015. Nation, Gender, Class: Celebrity Culture and the Performance of Identity in the Balkans. Slavic Review 74:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Vezovnik, Andreja
2015. Balkan Immigrant Workers as Slovenian Victimized Heroes. Slavic Review 74:2 ► pp. 244 ff.
Vezovnik, Andreja
2015. Balkan Immigrant Workers as Slovenian Victimized Heroes. Slavic Review 74:2 ► pp. 244 ff.
Vezovnik, Andreja
2017. Introduction to the thematic section. Two Homelands :45
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.