Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse
Edited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 218–233

Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors

Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies

| University of East Anglia |
The metaphorical categorization of social and political adversaries as “parasites” has an infamous history in public discourse: For two centuries it has been routinely used for the purpose of racial and socio-political stigmatization. In cognitive accounts, the parasite-metaphor has usually been treated as an example of semantic transfer from the biological to the social domain. Historically, however, the scientific uses cannot be deemed original or primary, as their emergence in the 17th and 18th centuries was preceded by a much older tradition of religious and social meanings. The paper charts the main traditions of diachronic variation in the discourse history of the parasite-metaphor anddiscusses the implications of its findings regarding the assumption of “uni-directionality” of metaphorization processes, which has been a central tenet of cognitive analyses. In conclusion, we ask whether metaphors in political discourse might fruitfully be viewed as a “parasitic” form of communication.
Keywords: Anti-Semitism, Chain of Being, Discourse-historical approach, metaphor, meme, metonymy, parasite, racism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: What it means to call somebody a “parasite”
  • 2.Cognitive accounts of “racial parasites”
  • 3.From society to biology and back: parasite-metaphors in history
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
References (86)
References
Alexander, Brian. 2009. “Amid Swine Flu Outbreak, Racism Goes Viral.” mnsbc.com 1 May 2009. [URL]Google Scholar
Baranov, Anatolij, and Jörg Zinken. 2003. “Die metaphorische Struktur des öffentlichen Diskurses in Russland und Deutschland: Perestroika- und Wende-Periode.” In Metapher, Bild und Figur, ed. by Bernhard Symanzik, Gerhard Birkfellner, and Alfred Sproede, 93–121. Hamburg: Verlag Kovac.Google Scholar
Bärtsch, Christine. 2004. Metaphernkonzepte in Pressetexten. Das Verhältnis der Schweiz zu Europa und zur Europäischen Union. Diss. phil.Zürich.Google Scholar
Beermann, R. 1964. “Soviet and Russian Anti-Parasite Laws.” Soviet Studies 15 (4): 420–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. “Construing the World: Conceptual Metaphors and Event-Construal in News Stories.” metaphorik.de 91: 9–32.Google Scholar
Bein, Alexander. 1965. “Der jüdische Parasit.” Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte 131: 121–149.Google Scholar
Benz, Wolfgang. 1995. Antisemitismus in Deutschland. Zur Aktualität eines Vorurteils. Munich: DTV.Google Scholar
Bey, Osman (Major). 1875. Die Eroberung der Welt durch die Juden. Versuch nach Geschichte und Gegenwart. Wiesbaden: Rudolf Bechtold & Comp.Google Scholar
Bosmajian, Haig. 1983. The Language of Oppression. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Brodie, Richard. 1996. Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme. Seattle, WA: Integral Press.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: The Case of Mein Kampf.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, F.E.G. 2002. “History of Human Parasitology.” Critical Microbiology Reviews 15 (4): 595–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 61901 [11859]. On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, Lucy S. 1986. The War against the Jews 1933–1945. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. New edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richards. 2004. “Viruses of the Mind.” In A Devil’s Chaplain. Selected Essays, ed. by Latha Menon, 151–172. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
de Baecque, Antoine. 1997. The Body Politic. Corporeal Metaphor in Revolutionary France 1770–1800. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Desmet, Pierre, Johan E. Rooryck, and Pierre Swiggers. 1990. “What Are Words Worth? Language and Ideology in French Dictionaries of the Revolutionary Period.” In Ideologies of Language, ed. by John E. Joseph, and Talbot J. Taylor, 162–188. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Ideologies, Racism, Discourse. Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues.” In Comparative Perspectives on Racism, ed. by Jessika ter Wal, and Maykel Verkuyten, 91–116. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Roslyn M. Frank, and Cornelia Ilie (eds). 2001. Language and Ideology. Volume II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drulàk, Petr. 2004. “Metaphors Europe Lives by: Language and Institutional Change of the European Union.” EUI Working Papers, SPS No. 2004/15, Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Eitz, Thorsten, and Georg Stötzel. 2007. Wörterbuch der „Vergangenheitsbewältigung“: Die NS-Vergangenheit im öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Fabiszak, Malgorzata. 2007. A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and its Implications. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Saul. 1998. Nazi Germany and the Jews. Vol. 1: The Years of Persecution, 1933–1939. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2008. “The ‘Metaphorical Annihilation’ of the Second Lebanon War (2006) from the Israeli Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 19 (5): 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gitelman, Zvi Y. 2001. A Century of Ambivalence: The Jews of Russia and the Soviet Union, 1881 to the Present. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson. 1999. “Blending and Metaphor.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Gerard Steen, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm. 1984. Deutsches Wörterbuch. 33 vols1. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert G. 1994. “The King and the Crowd: Divine Right and Popular Sovereignty in the French Revolution.” Contagion. Journal of Violence, Mimesis and Culture 31: 67–84Google Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey H. (ed.). 1994. Holocaust Remembrance: The Shapes of Memory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Bruce. 2001. “Ideology, Metaphor and Iconographic Reference.” In Language and Ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, ed. by René Dirven, Roslyn Frank, and Cornelia Ilie, 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1893. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (1784–91). In Sämmtliche Werke. Vol. 141, ed. by B. Suphan, Berlin 1909.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. 1933. Mein Kampf. 23rd ed. Munich: Franz Eher Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Hodson, Jane. 2007. Language and Revolution in Burke, Wollstonecraft, Paine and Godwin. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 1984. Politics, Culture and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. “The Many Bodies of Marie Antoinette: Political Pornography and the Problem of the Feminine in the French Revolution.” In Eroticism and the Body Politic, ed. by Lynn Hunt, 108–130. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inda, Jonathan Xavier. 2000. “Foreign Bodies: Migrants, Parasites and the Pathological Nation.” Discourse 22 (3): 46–62.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. 1966 [11606]. Volpone, or The Fox. In: Volpone and Other Plays. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 37–174.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2005. “Racist Manipulation within Austrian, German, Dutch, French and Italian Right-Wing Populism.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 2006. “60 Jahre danach. Vermutungen über eine sich verändernde Rhetorik des Erinnerns in Deutschland.” Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 2 (02): 97–120.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus, Vincent Pouliot, Nisha Shah, and Ruben Zaiotti (eds). 2008. Metaphors of Globalization. Mirrors, Magicians and Mutinies. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2009. “Metaphor, Culture and Discourse: the Pressure of Coherence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Jörg Zinken, 11–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyitsch. 1963–9. “The State and Revolution.” In Collected Works. Vol. 251, 381–492. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry George, and Robert Scott. 1869. A Greek-English Lexicon. 6th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken. 1936. The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1960. “Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte.“ In Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels. Werke. Vol. 81, 149–158. Berlin (GDR): Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Messer, Michi, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2012. Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vienna: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. “The Heart of the European Body Politic. British and German Perspectives on Europe’s Central Organ.” Multilingual & Multicultural Development 25 (5 & 6): 437–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “What Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? - The Function of Antisemitic Imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’.” Patterns of Prejudice 41 (1): 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the Body Politic. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Migration, Media and ‘Deliberate’ Metaphors.” metaphorik.de 211: 7–19.Google Scholar
Petraškaite-Pabst, Sandra. 2010. “Metaphors in German and Lithuanian Discourse Concerning the Expansion of the European Union.” In Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse, ed. by Ljiljana Šarić, Andreas Musolff, Stefan Manz, and Ingrid Hudabiunigg, 33–50. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pollak, Alexander, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2001. Der ausgebliebene Skandal. Wien: Czernin.Google Scholar
Pörksen, Bernhard. 2005. Die Konstruktion von Feindbildern. Zum Sprachgebrauch in neonazistischen Medien. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Peter W. 1980. Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rash, Felicity. 2006. The Language of Violence. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd revised edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. 1989. Citizens. A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Vintage Books/London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schmitz-Berning, Cornelia. 1998. Vokabular des Nationalsozialismus. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1976. Coriolanus, ed. by Philip Brockbank. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. 2002. 5th ed., ed. by William R. Trumble, and Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel. 1989. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers État? Précédé de L’Essai sur les Privilèges, ed. by Edme Champion. Paris: Quadrige/resses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1991. Illness as Metaphor. Aids and its Metaphors. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1987. “Das lange Leben der Metaphorik. Ein Versuch über die ‚Shoah’. Aus dem Englischen von Jörg Trabitius.” Akzente 341: 194–212.Google Scholar
WalesOnline. 2010. South Wales man called Jews parasites. [URL] (Last accessed December 31, 2010).
Walzer, Michael (ed.). 1992. Regicide and Revolution: Speeches at the Trial of Louis XVI. Translated by Marian Rothstein. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd revised edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, ed. by Willibald Steinmetz, 351–379. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zbierska-Sawala, Anna. 2004. The Conceptualisation of the European Union in Polish Public Discourse. Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25 (5 & 6): 408–423.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Carl. 2001. Parasite Rex. Inside the Bizarre World of Nature’s Most Dangerous Creatures. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2007. “Discourse Metaphors: The Link between Figurative Language and Habitual Analogies.” Cognitive Linguistics 18 (3): 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2008. “Discourse Metaphors.” In Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Andreas Musolff. 2009. “A Discourse-centred Perspective on Metaphorical Meaning and Understanding.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Jörg Zinken, 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Bao, Kai
2024. War on feminism: an analysis of metaphorical representations on Weibo. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Feifei, Fu & Rachel Thompson
2024. Analyzing metaphor patterns in COVID-19 news pictures: A critical study in China. PLOS ONE 19:2 ► pp. e0297336 ff. DOI logo
Rintamäki, Jukka, Simon Parker & André Spicer
2024. Institutional Parasites. Academy of Management Review DOI logo
Vazyanau, Andrei
2024. Ageing together: the symbiosis of gendered elderly bodies and old vehicles in a Ukrainian city. Eurasian Geography and Economics 65:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Daniel, Rhianwen
2023. Standardization and vitality. Language Problems and Language Planning 47:2 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Koller, Veronika, Alexandra Krendel & Jessica Aiston
2023. The Language of Gender-Based Separatism, DOI logo
Olsson, Pia
2023. The Mental Life of a Telephone Pole and Other Trifles: Affective Practices in the Context of Research Funding. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 52:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Tayebipour, Meysam
2023. Khomeini’s Words to the Iraqi People. In Ayatollah Khomeini Through the Lens of the Iran-Iraq War [Studies in Iranian Politics, ], ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Thinane, Dr Jonas Sello
2023. Missio politica on Coalition Governance: ‘better devils’ in SA Coalition Politics. Pharos Journal of Theology :104(2) DOI logo
Koca-Helvacı, Zeynep Cihan
2022. Chapter 8. ‘Coronavirus as a political weapon’. In Science Communication in Times of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 96], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Lahti, Emmi
2022. The Joint Construction of Hate Speech in Online Discussions. In Cyberhate in the Context of Migrations, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Mujagić, Mersina
2022. The Migration as an Invasion and the Common European House metaphors in media discourse. ExELL 10:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Fabiszak, Małgorzata, Isabelle Buchstaller, Anna Weronika Brzezińska, Seraphim Alvanides, Frauke Griese & Carolin Schneider
2021. Ideology in the linguistic landscape: Towards a quantitative approach. Discourse & Society 32:4 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga
2020. Conceptual blends in Polish anti-refugee rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne H.
2019. Le discours de haine dissimulée : le mépris pour humilier. Déviance et Société Vol. 43:3 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Hampl, Marek
2019. "Now is the time to root out evil" : the role of natural world metaphors in the construction of the "Us" and "Them" dichotomy. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [57] ff. DOI logo
Mujagić, Mersina & Sanja Berberović
2019. The IMMIGRANTS ARE ANIMALS metaphor as a deliberate metaphor in British and Bosnian-Herzegovinian media. ExELL 7:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Pawłowska, Katarzyna
2019. The wrestling with a pig in the mud metaphor in the service of liberal ideology: a critical analysis. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :27(4) ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Pawłowska, Katarzyna
2021. Interdiscursive Revitalization of the Red Plague Metaphor in Archbishop Jędraszewski’s 2019 Sermon: A Critical Analysis. Studies in Polish Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina Maria
2019. “Leftie snowflakes” and other metaphtonymies in the British political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Rafoss, Tore Witsø
2019. Enemies of freedom and defenders of democracy: The metaphorical response to terrorism. Acta Sociologica 62:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Thibodeau, Paul H., James Fleming & Maya Lannen
2019. Chapter 8. Variation in methods for studying political metaphor. In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Afreh, Esther Serwaah
2018. Metaphors Otumfoɔ Lives by: A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Metaphors in some Addresses by Otumfoɔ Osei Tutu ii, Asantehene. Cognitive Semantics 4:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Kopytowska, Monika & Paul Chilton
2018. “Rivers of blood”: Migration, fear and threat construction. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Monika Kopytowska
2017. Conceptualising the Other: Online discourses on the current refugee crisis in Cyprus and in Poland. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13:2 DOI logo
Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen
2017. The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol 32:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Kopytowska, Monika & Łukasz Grabowski
2017. European Security Under Threat: Mediating the Crisis and Constructing the Other. In National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis, ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Prażmo, Ewelina
2017. Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Burgers, Christian
2016. Conceptualizing Change in Communication Through Metaphor. Journal of Communication 66:2 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.