Article published in:
Cognitive Perspectives on Political DiscourseEdited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 234–254
A cognitive approach to early conservatism
Pascal Fischer | University of Bamberg
Conservatism is notoriously difficult to define. In the present study, conceptual metaphor theory is used to elucidate the nature of this ideology in its early phase when it emerged in England as a force struggling with the ideas of the French Revolution. It can be shown that conservative authors frequently do not conform to the pattern of orientational metaphors described by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (1980), according to which “up” is usually regarded as positive and “down” as negative. Conservatives often associate their own ideas with depth or a downward movement, whereas the loathed ideas of the political opponents are related to height or an upward movement. This dichotomy is closely connected to the polarity between solidity, stability and weight on the one hand and gaseity, volatility and lightness on the other. The study bases its analysis on numerous political tracts, pamphlets, and novels from the 1790s and early 1800s.
Keywords: Conservatism, French Revolution Debate, national identity, political writing, anti-Jacobin novels, conceptual metaphor theory, orientational metaphors
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Metaphors for the political system
- 3.Metaphors for the economy and society
- 4.Metaphors for the nation
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 29 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.03fis
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.03fis
References
Allison, Lincoln
Barcelona, Antonio
Bindman, David
Bödeker; Hans Erich, and Ernst Hinrichs
Bowles, John
Burke, Edmund
Cienki, Alan
Colley, Linda
Cunningham, Hugh
D’Israeli, Isaac
Dickinson, Harry T
Faulkner, John
Finlayson, Alan
Gilmartin, Kevin
Grenby, Matthew O
Hamilton, Elizabeth
Hamilton, William
Johnson, Nancy E
Lakoff, George
Love, Walter D
McCracken, David
Mitford, William
Müllenbrock, Heinz-Joachim
O’Gorman, Frank
Paine, Thomas
Polzenhagen, Frank
2010 “Kinship Conceptualisations in Models of Politics and of the State.” Presentation at the Workshop “Metaphor and Ideology” University of Freiburg, 21 June, 2010.
Priestley, Joseph
Proby, William C
Sack, James J
Schissler, Jakob
Schofield, Thomas P
Schubert, Christoph
Smith, Charlotte
Viereck, Peter et al.
Viereck, Peter
Volney, Constantin-François
Wagner, Peter
Walker, George
West, Jane
Western, John R
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Rafoss, Tore Witsø
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.