Article published in:
Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse
Edited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 289312
References
Bakthin, Mikhail
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 131: 145–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London, New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson
1982“Hearers and Speech Acts.” Language 58 (2): 332–373.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Angelo, Paul
2002“News Framing as a Multi-paradigmatic Research Program: A Response to Entman.” Journal of Communication 52 (4): 870–888. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
2005“Contextual Knowledge Management in Discourse Production: A CDA Perspective.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 71–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009“Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62–86. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus, and Christoph Sauer
2003“Social-functional and Cognitive Approaches to Discourse Interpretation: The Role of Frame and Perspective.” In Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse, ed. by Titus Ensink, and Christoph Sauer, 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M
1993“Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1985“Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni die Semantica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
2006“Frame Semantics.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 41, ed. by Edward Keith Brown, 613–620. Oxford: Elsevier.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1986“Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation.” Text 6 (3): 283–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard
1994Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. 3rd ed. Leipzig: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto
1991Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiński
2000“Vocative Address Forms and Ideological Legitimization in Political Debates.” Discourse Studies 21: 35–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keim, Inken
1999“Herstellen von Dominanz im Gespräch durch Dominantsetzen von Perspektiven.” In Autorität der/in Sprache, Literatur und Neuen Medien: Vorträge des Bonner Germanistentages 1997. Vol. 11, ed. by Jürgen Fohrmann, Ingrid Kasten, and Eva Neuland, 110–135. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari
2004“Framing Authority: Gender, Face, and Mitigation at a Radio Network.” Discourse and Society 151: 55–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, Peter
1992“Adressaten und Adressatenkarussell in der öffentlichen Auseinandersetzung.” In Rhetorik. Vol. 11: Rhetorik und Politik, ed. by Joachim Dyck, Walter Jens, and Gert Ueding, 51–66. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda E
1993“Interaction and Cognition: Speech Act Schemata with but, and their Interrelation with Discourse Type.” In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, ed. by Richard A. Geiger, and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 679–708. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana I
2009“Effective vs. Epistemic Stance, and Subjectivity/Intersubjectivity in Political Discourse: A Case Study.” In Studies on English Modality: In Honour of Frank Palmer, ed. by Anastasios Tsangalidis, and Roberta Facchinetti, 23–52. Bern, Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011“Effective vs. Epistemic Stance and Subjectivity in Political Discourse: Legitimising Strategies and Mystification of Responsibility.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 193–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jim R., and Peter R.R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George H
1959Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petter-Zimmer, Yvonne
1990Politische Fernsehdiskussionen und ihre Adressaten. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Prego-Vazquez, Gabriela
2007“Frame Conflict and Social Inequality in the Workplace: Professional and Local Discourse Struggles in Employee/customer Interactions.” Discourse and Society 181: 295–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1978“A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 7–55. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sànchez-García, Jesús, and Olga Blanco-Carrión
2007“Frames and Critical Discourse Analysis in Violence-Related Emotive Event Analysis.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Dominik Lukeš, 232–254. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Schindler, Kirsten
2004Adressatenorientierung beim Schreiben: Eine linguistische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Verfassens von Spielanleitungen, Bewerbungsbriefen und Absagebriefen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schröter, Melani
2006Adressatenorientierung in der öffentlichen politischen Rede: Eine qualitativ-pragmatische Korpusanalyse. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2011“Morality and Question Design: ‘Of Course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensing, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(ed.) 1993Framing in Discourse. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tverski, Amos, and Daniel Kahnemann
1981“The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 2111: 453–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Chillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], Crossref logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics  pp. 893 ff. Crossref logo
Mayaffre, Damon & Ronny Scholz
2017. Constructing ‘the French people’ – On Sarkozy’s populism. Journal of Language and Politics 16:5  pp. 683 ff. Crossref logo
Schröter, Melani
2021.  In When Politicians Talk,  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.