This contribution focuses on the implications of the institutional reform advanced by the Lisbon Treaty for the framing of discourses of European institutional actors. The article adopts a focused linguistic strategy aimed at identifying patterns of pronominal selection as useful tools to depict both the ways in which different EU actors in Brussels elaborate their sense of belonging, and also patterns of horizontal and vertical inter-institutional cooperation and conflict. The article firstly introduces the data and methodology employed in the analysis. Secondly, it sheds light on the main institutional arrangements established in the aftermath of Lisbon. Thirdly, it illustrates how referential/nomination strategies are on aggregate realised by interviewees. Finally, it presents an analysis of pronominal selection and contextualises the difficulties of individual actors working for the EU’s institutions in dealing with the current institutional structure.
2004 “Identity Change in the Context of the Growing Influence of European Institutions.” In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, ed. by Richard K. Hermann, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn B. Brewer, 25–58. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Carta, Caterina
2012The European Union Diplomatic Services: Ideas, Preferences and Identities. London: Routledge.
Carta, Caterina
2013a “The EEAS and EU Executive Actors within the Foreign Policy-Cycle”. In The EU’s Foreign Policy: What Kind of Power and Diplomatic Action?, ed. by M. Teló, and F. Ponjaert, 184–217. Basingstoke: Ashgate.
Carta, Caterina
2013b “The Geneva Convention: The External Representation of a System of Governance.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (3): 406–423.
Carta, Caterina
2014 “Use of Metaphors and International Discourse: The EU as an Idiot Power, a Deceptive Pangloss and a Don Giovanni in His Infancy.” Cooperation and Conflict 49 (3): 334–353.
Christiansen, Thomas
1997 “A Maturing Bureaucracy: The Role of the European Commission in the Policy Process.” In European Union: Power and Policy-making, ed. by Jeremy Richardson, 77–95. London: Routledge.
Cicourel, Aaron V
1987 “The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 217–226.
Cini, Michelle
1996The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the EU Administration. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Clarke, Ian, Winston Kwon, and Ruth Wodak
2012 “A Context-sensitive Approach to Analysing Talk in Strategy Meetings.” British Journal of Management 23 (4): 455–473.
Claude, Inis L
1956Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organisation. London: University of London Press.
Coombes, David
1972Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community. A Portrait of the Commission of the EEC. London: Allen & Unwin.
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse Society 10 (2): 149–173.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn
1993 “Foreign Policy as Social Construction.” International Studies Quarterly 371: 297–320
Gaxie, Daniel, Nicolas Hubé, and Jay Rowell
(eds)2011Perceptions of Europe: A Comparative Sociology of European Attitudes. Colchester: ECPR studies.
Hermann, Richard K., Thomas Risse, and Marilynn B. Brewer
(eds)2004Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Hettne, Björn and Söderbaum, Fredrik
2005 “Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism.” European Foreign Affairs Review 10(4): 535–552.
Hooghe, Liesbet
2001The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddy, Leonie
2001 “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22 (1): 127–156.
2011 “Three Dialogic Imperatives in International Relations Scholarship: A Buberian Programme.” Millennium – Journal of International Studies 391: 825.
Maitland, Karen, and John Wilson
1987 “Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict.” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 495–512.
2001Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
Risse, Thomas
2004 “European Institutions and Identity Change: What Have We Learned?” In (eds), Transnational Identities in Europe: Becoming European in the EU, ed. by Richard K. Herrmann, Marilynn B. Brewer, and Thomas Risse, 215–247. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sathe, Vijay
1983 “Implication of Corporate Culture: A Managerial Guide to Action.” Organisational Dynamics 13–28.
Searle, John. R
1969, 1997Speech Acts: An essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selznick, Philip
1957Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkley: University of California Press.
2000 “The European Commission.” In Reforming the European Union: From Maastricht to Amsterdam, ed. by Phil Lynch, Nanette Neuwahl, and G. Wyn Rees, 32–56. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Stevens, Anne, and Handley Stevens
2001Brussels Bureaucrats: The Administration of the European Union. London: Palgrave.
Tajfel, Henri
1982 “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 331: 1–39.
Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner
1979 “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict”. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. by William G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–48. Monterey, CA: Brooks & Cole.
Tajfel, Henri
1981Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, John C., Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell
1987Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, Teun A
2003 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi D. Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Weick, Karl
1995Sense-making in Organizations. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala
this issue). Debates about Security: The Revival of Nationalism in the European Union – A Discourse-historical Approach.
Wodak, Ruth
2004 “National and Transnational Identities: European and Other Identities Constructed in Interviews with Officials.” In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, ed. by Richard K. Hermann, Thomas Risse, and Marilynn B. Brewer, 97–128. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009 (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth
2011The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual (2nd rev. edn). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Avdagić, Kemal & Mirza Džanić
2023. Power relations through the prism of critical discourse analysis and systemic functional grammar. ExELL 11:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Carta, Caterina
2019. “A Rose by Any Other Name”: On Ways of Approaching Discourse Analysis. International Studies Review 21:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Mittag, Jürgen
2019. Triebkräfte der Gemeinschaftsbildung. In Handbuch Europäische Union, ► pp. 1 ff.
Mittag, Jürgen
2020. Triebkräfte der Gemeinschaftsbildung. In Handbuch Europäische Union, ► pp. 27 ff.
Rozgonyi, Krisztina
2019. The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing.
Journal of Digital Media & Policy
10:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Sandrin, Paula Orrico & Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann
2018. Silences and hierarchies in European Union Public Diplomacy. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 61:1
Wang, Xi
2021. Construing Community with a Shared Future in President Xi Jinping’s Diplomatic Discourse (2013–2018): The Role of Personal Pronouns we and they. Critical Arts 35:3 ► pp. 35 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.