Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 14:5 (2015) ► pp.665–688

Marking a sense of self and politics in interviews on political engagement

Interpretive logics and the metapragmatics of identity

| University of Navarra |
This paper explores the relationship between notions of self and politics in discourse on political engagement. By means of a heuristic inspired by the poststructuralist notion of logic and the pragmatic concept of metapragmatic awareness, the author argues that metapragmatic markers play an important role in communicating interpretive processes that inform preferred and disavowed modes of subjectivity. He relies on an interview conducted with an activist involved in Flemish minority politics in order to show how activists distinguish between preferred and disavowed modes of politics. In dealing with the multiplicity of identities and issues that constitute political debates, activists need to establish and communicate some degree of coherence. Metapragmatic awareness allows interlocutors to establish patterns of coherence that can be described in terms of interpretive logics. The author presents a strong case for taking the reflexive awareness of language users into account when studying society-wide debates.
Keywords: linguistic pragmatics, poststructuralism, logics, metapragmatics, metapragmatic markers, self, subjectivity, politics, political engagement, discourse theory, discourse analysis, ideology, hegemony, reflexivity, critique, interpretive logics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Why We Study Interpretive Logics
  • 3.Interpreting The Self In Discourse On Political Engagement
    • 3.1On metalinguistic and political awareness
    • 3.2Large-scale interpretive logics constitutive for the self
    • 3.3Being a bridge for others: A logic of rapprochement
    • 3.4Logics of enunciation
  • 4.Conclusions: Interpretive logics and the metapragmatics of identity
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.5.03zie
References (60)
References
Aggarwal, Neil. 2008. "Kashmiriyat as Empty Signifier." Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 10 (2): 222–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 1990. "Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life." Annual review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika A. 2005. "Frames Revisited - the Coherence-inducing Function of Frames." Journal of Pragmatics 371: 685–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. "Framing Processes and Social Movements: an Overview and Assessment." Annual Review of Sociology 261: 611–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Dong Jie. 2010. Ethnographic Fieldwork: A Beginner's Guide. Bristol: Multilingual matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren. 1998. Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borah, Porismita. 2011. "Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Lierature." Journal of Communication 611: 246–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouzarmat, Imane. 2010. “Speech 10 jaar SAMV.” [URL]
Boyer, Dominic, and Claudio Lomnitz. 2005. "Intellectuals and Nationalism." Annual Review of Anthropology 341: 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, and Axel Hübler. 2007. Metapragmatics in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C. 1998. "Metapragmatics." In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2001. De discursieve articulatie van publieksparticipatie in vier televisie talkshows: een onderzoek naar de constructie van publieksparticipatie in het televisiesysteem aan de hand van de discourstheorie van Ernesto Laclau en Chantal Mouffe. Ph.d., Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Elliott, Anthony. 2009. Concepts of the Self. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Polity Press. Original edition, 2008. Reprint, 2009.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Lilie Chouliaraki. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 2005. "The Intellectuals." In Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. by Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, 5–23. New York: International Publishers. Original edition, 1971.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Donald E. 2004. Subjectivity, The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Grant Gillet. 1994. The Discursive Mind. London / New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, Fathali M. Moghaddam, Tracey Pilkerton Cairnie, Daniel Rothbart, and Steven R. Sabat. 2009. "Recent Advances in Positioning Theory." Theory & Psychology 19 (1): 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Peter Stearns. 1995. Discursive Psychology in Practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesters, Delphine. 2011. Identity, Culture Talk & Culture. Ph.d., Faculteit sociale wetenschappen, KULeuven, Leuven.Google Scholar
Holstein, James A., and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2000. The Self we Live by: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. "Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis." In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, ed. by David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, 1–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel, and Wolfram Bublitz. 2007. "Introducing Metapragmatics in Use." In Metapragmatics in use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Dirk, and Andrea Rea. 2006. “Construction and Import of Ethnic Categorisations: Allochthones in the Netherlands and Belgium.” 291, [URL].
Jacobs, Dirk, Andrea Rea, Céline Teny, Louise Callier, and Sandrine Lothaire. 2009. De sociale lift blijft steken: de prestaties van allochtone leerlingen in de Vlaamse gemeenschap en de Franse gemeenschap. [URL].
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski. 2004. Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanmaz, Meryem. 2007. Moskeeën in Gent: tussen subcultuur en sociale beweging: emancipatiedynamieken van moslimminderheden in de diaspora. Ph.d., Political and Social Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Florian Oberhuber. 2007. (Un)Doing Europe: Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1994a. The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1994b. "Why do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?" In Emancipation(s), ed. by Ernesto Laclau, 36–46. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2000a. "Foreword." In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, ed. by David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, x-xi. Manchester / New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000b. "Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics." In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, ed. by Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek, 44–89. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 1999. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers ltd.Google Scholar
Montessano Montessori, Nicolina. 2011. "The Design of a Theoretical, Methodological, Analytical Framework ro Analyse Hegemony in Discourse." Critical Discourse Studies 8 (3): 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nabers, D. 2009. "Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001." Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2): 191–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David C. Clarke. 1996. Language, Action, Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikander, Pirjo. 2008. "Working with Transcripts and Translated Data." Qualitative Research in Psychology 5 (3): 225–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rea, Andrea. 2006. "Het immigratiebeleid: van geordende migraties tot ordeloze migraties." In Immigratie en integratie anders denken: een Belgisch interuniversitair initiatief, ed. by Bichara Khader, Marco Martiniello, Andrea Rea, and Christiane Timmerman, 171–202. Brussel: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2005. "Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges." In Discourse Theory in European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance, ed. by David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. New York: Palgrave / Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. 2003 edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2004. "Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use." In Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski, 53–74. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. "Introduction: The Pragmatic Perspective." In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2009. Key Notions for Pragmatics. Vol. 1, Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Maragaret. 1998. "Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue." Discourse and Society 9 (3): 387–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Maragaret, and Jonathan Potter. 1988. "Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires." In Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, ed. by Charles Antaki, 99–114. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora, and Marleen van der Haar. Forthcoming. "People Out of Place: Allochthony and Autochthony in Netherlands Identity Discourse - Metaphors and Categories in Action." Journal of International Relations and Development. DOI logo
Zienkowski, Jan. 2011a. Analysing Political Engagement: An Interpretive and Functionalist Discourse Analysis of Evolving Political Subjectivities among Public Activists and Intellectuals with a Moroccan Background in Flanders. Ph.d., Dept. of Linguistics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.Google Scholar
. 2011b. "Discursive Pragmatics: A Platform for the Pragmatic Study of Discourse." In Discursive Pragmatics, ed. by Jan Zienkowski, Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. "Overcoming the Post-structuralist Methodological Deficit: Metapragmatic Markers and Interpretive Logics in a Critique of the Bologna Process." Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association 22 (3): 501–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. "Marking Subjectivity in Interviews on Political Engagement: Interpretive Logics and the Metapragmatics of Identity." In Was machen Marker? Logik, Materialität und Politik von Differenzierungsprozessen, ed. by Eva Bonn, Christian Knöppler, and Miguel Souza, 85–112. Berlin: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Galindo-Ramírez, Joaquín, Germán Jaraíz-Arroyo & Macarena Hernández-Ramírez
2022. Politician, activist… or hero?. Journal of Language and Politics 21:5 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Zienkowski, Jan
2017. Reflexivity in the transdisciplinary field of critical discourse studies. Palgrave Communications 3:1 DOI logo
Zienkowski, Jan
2017. Self and Politics in Activist Discourse. In Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse, ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.