In this article we report on a corpus-based study of the lexical item ‘choice’. ‘Choice’ was previously
found to be a keyword in Jeffries and Walker’s (2012) study of political discourse from
the New Labour years, occurring more frequently in newspaper articles during that period (1998–2007) than in those dating from the
years in which John Major was Prime Minister (1990–1997). The current project investigates the use of ‘choice’ in British general
election manifestos between 1900 and 2010. We first of all carry out a quantitative study of the use of ‘choice’ by the three main
UK political parties across this time period, before undertaking a qualitative study of the use of the word in context. Our
approach is informed by work in lexical meaning and critical stylistics, and demonstrates how ‘choice’ has taken on new semantic
meanings in a political context.
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, and Tony McEnery. 2009. A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 17 (5): 563–581.
Clarke, John, Janet Newman, Nick Smith, Elizabeth Vidler, and Louise Westmarland. 2007a. Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. London: Sage.
Clarke, John, Janet Newman, and Louise Westmarland. 2007b. “Creating Citizen-consumers? Public Service Reform and (Un)willing Selves.” In On Willing Selves: Neoliberal Politics and the Challenge of Neuroscience, ed. by Sabine Maasen and Barbara Sutter, 125–145. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clarke, John, Nicholas Smith, and Elizabeth Vidler. 2006. “The Indeterminacy of Choice: Political, Policy and Organisational Implications.” Social Policy and Society 5 (3): 327–336.
Clarke, John, Janet Newman, and Louise Westmarland. 2008. “The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the Reform of Public Services.” Social Policy and Society 7 (2): 245–253.
Edwards, Geraint O. 2012. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the Construction of ‘In-groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 Manifestos of the British National Party.” Discourse & Society 23 (3): 245–258.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Jeffries, Lesley. 2010. Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
L’Hote, Emily. 2010. “New Labour and Globalization: Globalist Discourse with a Twist?” Discourse & Society 21 (4): 355–376.
Louw, Bill. 2000. “Contextual Prosodic Theory: Bringing Semantic Prosodies to Life.” In Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on His Retirement, ed. by Chris Heffer and Helen Sauntson, 48–94. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Mulderrig, Jane. 2003. “Learning to Labour: The Discursive Construction of Social Actors in New Labour’s Education Policy.” In Britain Under Blair, ed. by Merle Tonnies, 123–145. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.
Mulderrig, Jane. 2011. “The Grammar of Governance.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (1): 45–68.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery. 2006. “Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” Applied Linguistics 27 (1): 103–129.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Gomez-Jimenez, Eva M.
2019. Book Review: Lesley Jeffries and Brian Walker, Keywords in the Press. The New Labour Years. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:1 ► pp. 108 ff.
Nartey, Mark & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru
2019. Towards a decade of synergising corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis: a meta-analysis. Corpora 14:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Toolan, Michael
2018. The Language of Inequality in the News,
Tabbert, Ulrike
2016. Critical Stylistics. In Language and Crime, ► pp. 27 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.