People’s right to keep and bear arms
Arguments on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution in District of Columbia v. Heller
The article presents an analysis of the majority and minority opinions from the Supreme Court of the United States issued on District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. The court case addressed the meaning of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution that establishes gun rights in a famously confusing wording. The analysis applies parts of Fairclough and Fairclough’s (2011, 2012) model of analysing argumentation and also discusses intertextuality to account for how the justices construct their arguments. The analysis shows how the justices shape their arguments on the basis of their values and beliefs, presenting contradictory readings of the amendment, sources of evidence and the preferred application of the amendment.
References (59)
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. by
Michael Holquist. Translated by
Caryl Emerson and
Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Ed. by
Caryl Emerson and
Michael Holquist. Translated by
Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Balkin, Jack M.
2004 “
The Passionate Intensity of the Confirmation Process”.
Jurist. Accessed June 22, 2011,
[URL].
Balter, S. J.
2001 “
The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson.”
Argumentation 15 (4): 381–395.
Baum, Lawrence
2001 The Supreme Court. 7th Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Bernstein, Basil
1996 Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Billig, Michael
2003 “
Political Communication.” In
Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. by
David O. Sears,
Leonie Huddy, and
Robert Jervis, 222–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackstone, William
. N.d. [
1765] “
Commentaries on the Law of England.” Accessed June 22, 2011,
[URL].
Blommaert, Jan
2005 Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Michael S.
2001 “
The Strange Case of United States v. Miller.” Accessed February 16, 2008,
[URL].
Cress, Lawrence Delbert
1984 “
An Armed Community: The Origins and Meaning of the Right to Bear Arms The Journal of American History 71 (1): 22–42.
Fairclough, Norman
1999 Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Fairclough, Norman
2001 “
The Discourse of New Labour: Critical Discourse Analysis.” In
Discourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis, ed. by
Margaret Wetherell,
Stephanie Taylor, and
Simeon J. Yates, 229–266. London: SAGE Publications.
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2011 “
Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: The UK Government’s Response to the Economic Crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report.”
Discourse and Society 22 (3): 243–268.
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman, and Lilie Chouliaraki
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Ana Tominc
Freitas, Lúcia Gonçalves
2014 “
Argumentation and Discourse on the Maria da Penha Act in Decisions of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice.”
Bakhtiniana 9 (1): 75–99.
Hodges, Adam
2008 “
The Politics of Recontextualisation: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq.”
Discourse & Society 19 (4): 483–505.
Hodges, Adam
2011 The “War on Terror” Narrative. Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kienpointner, Manfred
2013 Review of Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough’s Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Journal of Language and Politics 12 (2): 295–304.
Kristeva, Julia
1986 “
Word, Dialogue and Novel.” In
The Kristeva Reader, ed. by
Toril Moi, 34–61. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Krzyzanowski, Michal
2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang,
Levinson, Sanford
1989 “
The Embarrassing Second Amendment.”
The Yale Law Journal 99 (3): 637–659.
Levy, Robert A.
2007 “
The D.C. Gun Ban: Supreme Court Preview.” Accessed August 23, 2012,
[URL].
Levy, Robert A, Ilya Shapiro, and Roger Pilon
2009 “
National Rifle Association v. City of Chicago; McDonald v. City of Chicago.” Accessed June 8, 2011,
[URL].
Martinez Guillem, Susana
2009 “
Argumentation, Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political Communication.”
Discourse & Society 20 (6): 727–746.
Mootz, Francis J.
III
2010 “
Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.”
Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4), 383–402.
Morson, Gary Saul, and Caryl Emerson
1990 Mikhail Bakhtin: The Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Perelman, Chaïm
1980 Justice, Law, and Argument. Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Põiklik, Pille
2011 “
The Unalienable Right to Keep and Bear Arms? Interpreting the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in the Light of American Ideals.”
Estonian Journal of English Studies 2 (1): 110–124.
Põiklik, Pille
2012 “
Recontextualisation of the Second Amendment and Supreme Court Decisions in The New York Times.”
Brno Studies in English 38 (1): 23–37.
Põiklik, Pille
2013 Space and Positioning in Media Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Second Amendment Court Cases in The New York Times. PhD Dissertation, University of Tartu. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2009 “
The discourse-historical approach.” In
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition, ed. by
Ruth Wodak, and
Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: SAGE Publications.
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
2009 “
The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.”
Controversia 2 (6), 45–77.
Scalia, Antonin
2008 “
The Opinion of the Court in District of Columbia et al., Petitioners v. Dick Anthony Heller. 554 U.S.__(2008).” Accessed August 5, 2012,
[URL].
Scollon, Ron
2001 Mediated Discourse. The Nexus of Practice. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Shalhope, Robert E.
1982 “
The Ideological Origins of the Second Amendment.”
The Journal of American History 69 (3): 599–614.
Sirovich, Lawrence
2003 “
A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court.”
PNAS 100 (13): 7432–7437.
Stevens, John P.
2008 “
Dissenting Opinion in District of Columbia et al., Petitioners v. Dick Anthony Heller. 554 U.S.__(2008).” Accessed August 5, 2012,
[URL].
Target Point Consulting. N.d.
The Ideological History of the Supreme Court, 1937–2007.” Accessed July 12, 2011,
[URL].
Toobin, Jeffrey
2008 The Nine. Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 “
Discourse, Context and Cognition.”
Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177.
van Dijk, Teun A.
2008 Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2009 “
The Study of Argumentation.” In
The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. by
Andrea A. Lunsford,
Kirt H. Wilson, and
Rosa A. Eberly, 109–124. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
van Rees, M. Agnes
2007 “
Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory: The Case of Television Talk.”
Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1454–1463.
van Rees, Agnes
2010 Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions. A Pragma-Dialectic Perspective. Berlin: Springer
Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak
2007 “
Introduction: Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In
Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, ed. by
Gilbert Weiss, and
Ruth Wodak, 1–32. Hampshire and London: Palgrave.
Williams, David C.
2003 Mythic Meanings of the Second Amendment: Taming Political Violence in a Constitutional Republic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Winkler, Adam
2007 “
Scrutinizing the Second Amendment.”
Michigan Law Review 105 (4): 683–733.
Winkler, Adam
2009 “
Heller’s Catch 22
.”
UCLA Law Review 561: 1550–1577.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications.
Woll, Peter
1990 American Government. Readings and Cases. 10th Edition. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Žagar, Igor Ž.
2010 “
Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.”
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 3–27.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
Tarrant, Stella
2018.
A strange right to bear arms: District of Columbia v Heller as narrative.
Griffith Law Review 27:1
► pp. 51 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.