Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:6 (2016) ► pp.768–789

Name as a regional brand

The case of Local Action Groups in Czechia

| Charles University, Czechia
| Charles University, Czechia
| Charles University, Czechia
The article addresses denominations of specific regions, Local Action Groups (LAGs), in Czechia, and contributes to the academic debate regarding: relationships between formation of regions, their symbolic shape and regional identity; formation of regions by means of regional development. A set of 179 LAG names registered in the database of the National Network of Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic as of March 2014 are examined. LAG names are first analyzed in terms of the phenomena that constitute their essence, and subsequently their territorial differentiation is discussed. The analysis affirms the importance of territorial approach towards regional denomination. It has equally been affirmed that region naming strategies are spatially fragmented. Nevertheless, the territorial differentiation of names of LAG regions mirrors the elementary spatial patterns traditionally reproduced in the Czech context, namely west-east gradient of development level, distinctions between historical lands and differences between inland and borderland resettled after WWII.
Keywords: symbolic shape, regional names, regional identity, regional differentiation, regional development, Local Action Groups, Czechia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Regional name: symbol and brand
  • 3.Local Action Groups and their position in Czechia
  • 4.Materials and methods
  • 5.Semantic basis of LAG names
  • 6.Spatial differentiation of LAG names
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.06sem
References (73)
References
Allen, April. 2011. “The role of history in place marketing: Can branding create a sense of place?” Journal of Town and City Management 2 (1): 75–83.Google Scholar
Anholt, Simon. 2011. “Beyond the nation brand: The role of image and identity in international relations.” In Brands and Branding Geographies ed. by Andy Pike, 289–301. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bělič, Jaromír. 1968. “Čech – Česko?” Naše řeč 51 (5): 299–300.Google Scholar
. 1969. “Ještě jednou Česko.” Naše řeč 52 (4): 256–259.Google Scholar
Brendler, Andrea, and Silvio Brendler. 2004. Namenarten und ihre Erforschung: Ein Lehrbuch für das Studium der Onomastik. Hamburg: Baar Verlag.Google Scholar
Bruckheimer, Karl. 2000. “LEADER in Germany and the discourse of autonomous regional development.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 219–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buller, Henry. 2000. “Re-creating rural territories: LEADER in France.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 190–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CEC, Commission of the European Communities. 1996. The Cork Declaration: A Living Countryside. [online: accessed in Nov. 2014]: [URL]
. 1997. CAP 2000 Working Document: Rural Developments. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Čechová, Marie, and Miloš Dokulil. 2011. Čeština – řeč a jazyk. Praha: SPN.Google Scholar
Chalupa, Jan. 2015. Historickogeografická česko-moravská zemská hranice: rekonstrukce, percepce, významy. [Master thesis]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.Google Scholar
Chromý, Pavel, and Helena Janů. 2003. “Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential of the development of peripheral regions.” AUC Geographica 38 (1): 105–117.Google Scholar
Chromý, Pavel, Silvie Kučerová, and Zdeněk Kučera. 2009. “Regional identity, contemporary and historical regions and the issue of relict borders: the case of Czechia.” Region and Regionalism 9 (2): 9–19.Google Scholar
Chromý, Pavel, Michal Semian, and Zdeněk Kučera. 2014. “Regionální vědomí a regionální identita v Česku: případová studie Českého ráje.” Geografie 119 (3): 259–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čižmárová, Libuše. 2015. “History of and popular attitudes towards names for the Czech-speaking territory.” AUC Geographica 50 (1): 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
David, Jaroslav. 2011. Smrdov, Brežněves a Rychlonožkova ulice: kapitoly z moderní české toponymie. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Street names – between ideology and cultural heritage.” Acta Onomastica 541: 53–60.Google Scholar
David, Jaroslav, and Michal Semian. 2015. “Bohemian Manchester, Moravian Klondike and Silesian Versailles: Attributive structures of foreign place names in contemporary Czech journalism.” Slovo a slovesnost 76 (2): 129–147.Google Scholar
Deas, Iain, and Alex Lord. 2006. “From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state.” Urban Studies 43 (10): 1847–1877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esparcia Perez, Javier. 2000. “The LEADER programme and the rise of rural development in Spain.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 200–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, Ying. 2006. “Branding the nation: What is being branded?” Journal of Vacation Marketing 12 (1): 5–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frolec, Václav. 1985. Etnografické regiony a subregiony v ČSR. [Mezi hudci supplement]. Brno: Blok.Google Scholar
Hampl, Martin, Václav Gardavský, and Karel Kühnl. 1987. Regionální struktura a vývoj systému osídlení ČSR. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.Google Scholar
Harvalík, Milan, and Pavel Boháč. 2000. “Exonyme und Standardisierung fremder geographischer Namen im Tschechischen.” Onoma 351: 229–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Havlíček, Tomáš, Pavel Chromý, Vít Jančák, and Miroslav Marada. 2008. “Innere und äussere Peripherie am beispiel Tschechiens.” Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 1501: 299–316.Google Scholar
Havlíček, Tomáš, and Martina Hupková. 2013. “Sacred structures in the landscape: The case of rural Czechia.” Scottish Geographical Journal 129 (2): 100–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, George. 2009. “Region.” In The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition, ed. by Derek Gregory, Ron Johnston, Geraldine Pratt, Michael J. Watts, and Sarah Whatmore, 630–632. Chichester: Wiley‒Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heřmanová, Eva, and Pavel Chromý et al. 2009. Kulturní regiony a geografie kultury. Praha: ASPI.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Vladimír. 2013. “Pokus o analýzu odporu proti jednoslovnému názvu českého státu.” Klaudyán 10 (1–2): 1–12.Google Scholar
Hospers, Gert-Jan. 2011. “Four of the most common misconceptions about place marketing.” Journal of Town and City Management 2 (2): 167–176.Google Scholar
Jančák, Vít, Tomáš Havlíček, Pavel Chromý, and Miroslav Marada. 2008. “Regional differentiation of selected conditions for the development of human and social capital in Czechia.” Geografie 113 (3): 269–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeřábek, Richard. 1987. “Ethnische und ethnographische Gruppen und Regionen in den Böhmischen Ländern.” Ethnologia slavica 191: 122–164.Google Scholar
Kašková, Magdalena, and Pavel Chromý. 2014. “Regional product labelling as part of the region formation process: The case of Czechia.” AUC Geographica 49 (2): 87–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, Michael (ed). 2004. Regions and Regionalism in Europe. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Kovách, Imre. 2000. “LEADER, a new social order, and the Central- and East-European countries.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 181–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krejčí, Pavel. 2008. “Don’t be afraid of CZECHIA, it needs your help!” Klaudyán 5 (1): 30–37.Google Scholar
Kučera, Zdeněk, Silvie Kučerová-Kuldová, and Pavel Chromý. 2008. “Landscape heritage between areal preservation and areal development – the case of Czechia.” Geographia Polonica 81 (2): 5–23.Google Scholar
Kučera, Zdeněk, and Silvie Kučerová. 2012. “Historical geography of persistence, destruction and creation: The case of rural landscape transformations in Czechia’s resettled borderland. Historická geografie 38 (1): 165–184.Google Scholar
Lee, Jo, Arnar Árnason, Andrea Nightingale, and Mark Shucksmith. 2005. “Networking: Social capital and identities in European rural development.” Sociologia Ruralis 45 (4): 269–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. [La production de l’espace, trans. by Donald Nicholson-Smith, originaly published in 1974]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mze, Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR. 2014. Venkov: Místní akční skupiny. [online: accessed in Feb. 2014]: [URL]
NSMAS, Národní síť Místních akčních skupin ČR. 2014. Seznam Místních akčních skupin. [online: accessed in Feb. 2014]: [URL]
Olivová-Nezbedová, Libuše. 1997. “Jména ulic, náměstí, nábřeží a sadů na katastru města Choceně v minulosti a současnosti.” Acta Onomastica 381: 43–68.Google Scholar
Olivová-Nezbedová, Libuše, Miroslava Knappová, Jitka Malenínská, and Jana Matúšková. 1995. Pomístní jména v Čechách: o čem vypovídají jména polí, luk, lesů, hor, vod a cest. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Osti, Giorgio. 2000. “LEADER and partnerships: The case of Italy.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 172–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paasi, Anssi. 1986. “The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity.” Fennia 164 (1): 105–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (4): 536–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “The resurgence of the region and regional identity: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observation on regional dynamics in Europe.” Review of International Studies 351: 121–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Regions are social constructs, but ‘who’ or ‘what’ constructs them? Agency in question.” Environment and Planning A 421: 2296–2301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlín, Radim, Silvie Kučerová, and Zdeněk Kučera. 2010. “Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka.” Geografie 115 (2): 161–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Andy. 2011. “Introduction: Brands and branding geographies.” In Brands and Branding Geographies ed. by Andy Pike, 3–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pred, Allan R. 1984. “Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74 (2): 279–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Profous, Antonín. 1918. O místních a zvláště pomístních jménech v okrsku chrasteckém u Chrudimě. Praha.Google Scholar
Ray, Christopher. 2000a. Endogenous Socio-Economic Development and Trustful Relationships: Partnerships, Social Capital and Individual Agency. [Working Paper 45]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
. 2000b. “The EU LEADER programme: Rural development laboratory.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 163–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semian, Michal. 2012. “Název jako symbol regionu.” Historická geografie 38 (2): 335–352.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Historical aspects and influences of the reproduction of regions in Czechia.” In Between Time and Space, ed. by Sulevi Riukulehto, 23–43. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Novodobá choronyma v současném regionálním systému.” In Toponyma: kulturní dědictví a paměť míst, ed. by Jaroslav David, 158–169. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita.Google Scholar
. 2016b. “Region in its complexity: A discussion on constructivist approaches.” AUC Geographica 51 (2): 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semian, Michal, and Pavel Chromý. 2014. “Regional identity as a driver or a barrier in the process of regional development: A comparison of selected European experience.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 68 (5): 263–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šerý, Miloslav, and Petr Šimáček. 2013. “Vnímání hranic obyvatelstvem regionů s rozdílnou kontinuitou socio-historického vývoje jako dílčí aspekt jejich regionální identity.” Geografie 118 (4): 392–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shucksmith, Mark. 2000. “Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2): 208–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šifta, Miroslav, and Pavel Chromý. 2014. “Symboly a identita regionu: analýza vnímání přírodních symbolů oblastí s intenzivně přeměněnou krajinou v Česku.” Geografický časopis 66 (4): 401–415.Google Scholar
Simon, Carola, Paulus Huigen, and Peter Groote. 2010. “Analysing regional identities in the Netherlands.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101 (4): 409–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siwek, Tadeusz, and Jaromír Kaňok. 2000. “Mapping Silesian identity in Czechia.” Geografie 105 (2): 190–200.Google Scholar
Šmilauer, Vladimír. 1963. Úvod do toponomastiky. Praha: SPN.Google Scholar
Šrámek, Rudolf. 1999. Úvod do obecné onomastiky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.Google Scholar
Süssner, Josefina. 2002. “Culture, identity and regional development in the European Union.” Informationen zur Raumentwicklung (4–51): 199–206.Google Scholar
Thuesen, Annette Aagaard. 2010. “Is LEADER elitist or inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG boards in the 2007–2013 rural development and fisheries programmes.” Sociologia Ruralis 50 (1): 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vařeka, Josef. 1997. “Národopisné oblasti v Čechách ve světle etnokartografie.” In Evropský kulturní prostor – jednota v rozmanitosti, ed. by Josef Vařeka, Markéta Holubová, and Lydia Petráňová, 40–49. Praha: AV ČR.Google Scholar
Warnaby, Gary, David Bennison, and Dominic Medway. 2011. “Branding a Roman frontier in the twenty-first century.” In Brands and Branding Geographies ed. by Andy Pike, 248–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, František. 2013. Role MAS je vyjasněna již dávno. [online: accessed in Feb. 2014]: [URL]
Zimmerbauer, Kaj. 2011. “From image to identity: Building regions by place promotion.” European Planning Studies 19 (2): 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Šerý, Miloslav, Jan Daniel & Jindřich Frajer
2024. Exploring the Role of Street Names in the Reproduction of Deinstitutionalised Regions. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie DOI logo
Gnatiuk, Oleksiy & Anatoliy Melnychuk
2021. Historical heraldic symbols as a marker of reproducing and transforming regional identity: The case of Ukraine. Geographia Polonica 94:4 ► pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
David, Jaroslav
2020. OLD-CZECH, OLD-SLAVIC, AND OLD-CHURCH-SLAVIC - ON THE SEMANTIC FIELDS OF THREE ADJECTIVES. Bohemica Olomucensia 12:2 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Komárek, Marek & Pavel Chromý
2020. The institutional thickness of an inner periphery in the cross-border region between Central Bohemia and Eastern Bohemia. Geografie 125:4 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Kearns, Robin A. & Nicolas Lewis
2019. City renaming as brand promotion: exploring neoliberal projects and community resistance in New Zealand. Urban Geography 40:6 ► pp. 870 ff. DOI logo
Frajer, Jindřich & David Fiedor
2018. Discovering extinct water bodies in the landscape of Central Europe using toponymic GIS. Moravian Geographical Reports 26:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Kučerová, Silvie R., Zdeněk Kučera & Kateřina Novotná
2018. Formation of a regional image through geography textbooks: The case of north-west Bohemia. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 72:3 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Patkós, Csaba
2018. Specialities in the Institutionalisation of Hungarian Leader Local Action Groups. European Countryside 10:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Margarisová, Klára & Lucie Vokáčová
2017. Regional Branding: Building Brand Value. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64:6 ► pp. 2059 ff. DOI logo
Osoba, Petr
2017. Development of Symbolic Shape of the Region and Rejection of the Name Nové Sudety. Geografie 122:3 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Šifta, Miroslav & Pavel Chromý
2017. The importance of symbols in the region formation process. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 71:2 ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.