Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:3 (2017) ► pp.388–411

Speeding up or reaching out?

Efficiency and unmet need as policy priorities in Wales

ORCID logo | Sheffield Hallam University
ORCID logo | Northumbria University
ORCID logo | University of California Los Angeles
ORCID logo | Swansea University
ORCID logo | Cardiff University
The Welsh Assembly, a devolved legislature in the UK, and its executive the Welsh Government, have a distinctly intensive commitment to equality – emphasising universality with weighty obligations on public services. This article uses the ‘discourse-historical approach’ (DHA) to critically review an eleven-year social service reform strategy (produced in 2007), and to weigh up its emphasis on fiscal efficiency and universal equality. We refer to these competing priorities as ‘speeding up’ and ‘reaching out’, respectively. Our findings show an imbalance towards the former, largely sidelining the possible value of services to those currently under-served. The article discusses this mismatch in respect of the dominant policymaking framework of ‘New Public Management’ and its emphases on productivity, efficiency, and quantifiable accountability. We also show the value of DHA in analysing ‘fights for dominance’ – in this case between competing discourses within a flagship policy document.
Keywords: Discourse-historical approach, social exclusion, social policy, social services, Wales, Welsh Government
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • Focusing on existing user groups vs. finding new ones
    • References to familiar vs. unfamiliar social groupings
    • Efficiency as an inherent good vs. the value of time-redundancy and flexibility
  • 4.Working together to reduce harm
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 25 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15005.say
References (59)
References
Baker, Paul. 2012. Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 9(3): 247–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barchas-Lichtenstein, Jena. 2013. When the Dead are Resurrected, How are We Going to Speak to Them?”: Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Use of Indigenous Languages in the Globalizing Textual Community . PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
BBC News. 2002. New Labour ‘Attack’ under Fire . Accessed 24 March 2016. [URL].
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A. Julian Gould‐Williams; Jennifer Law, and Richard Walker. 1999. Best Value in Welsh Local Government: Progress and Prospects. Local Government Studies . 25(2): 68–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brackertz, Nicola. 2007. Who is Hard to Reach and Why? ISR Working Paper, Swinburne Institute for Social Research . Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
Breeze, Jayne Ann, and Julie Repper. 1998. Struggling for Control: The Care Experiences of ‘Difficult’ Patients in Mental Health Services. Journal of Advanced Nursing . 28(6): 1301–1311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, Jane, and Richard Laughlin. 2002. “Public Service Professionals and the New Public Management: Control of the Professions in the Public Services”. In: New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewen Ferlie, 95–108. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doern, G. Bruce. 1993. “The UK Citizen’s Charter: Origins and Implementation in Three Agencies”. Policy and Politics . 21(1): 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cairney, Paul. 2002. “New Public Management and the Thatcher Healthcare Legacy: Enough of the Theory, What About the Implementation?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(3): 375–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cairney, Paul, Michael Keating and Eve Hepburn. 2009. Policy Transfer in the UK since Devolution. 59th Annual Political Studies Association Conference on “Challenges for Democracy in a Global Era” . University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Anabela. 2008. “Media(ted) Discourse and Society”. Journalism Studies 9(2): 161–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CCHQ (Conservative Campaign Headquarters). 2015. Prime Minister: Conference Speech 2015. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
Chaney, Paul. 2004. “The Post-Devolution Equality Agenda: The Case of the Welsh Assembly’s Statutory Duty to Promote Equality of Opportunity”. Policy and Politics 32(1): 63–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Education, Equality and Human Rights: Exploring the Impact of Devolution in the UK” Social Policy 31(3): 431–453.Google Scholar
Chia, Robert. 2000. “Discourse Analysis as Organizational Analysis” Organization 7(3): 513–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cloke, Paul, Jon May, and Sarah Johnsen. 2010. Swept up Lives? Re-envisioning the Homeless City. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chik, and Peter Jones. 2006. “Analysis of Discourse as ‘a Form of History Writing’: a Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis and an Illustration of a Cultural-Historical Alternative” Atlantic Journal of Communication 14(1-2): 51–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Mike J., K. Price, F. Gordon, M. Josson, B. Taylor, A. Bateman, P. Fonagy, P. Tyrer, and P. Moran. 2009. “Engagement and Retention in Specialist Services for People with Personality Disorder” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 119(4): 304–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
. 2000. New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, second edition. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In: Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Harding, Jamie. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis from Start to Finish. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hope Sr., Kempe Ronald. 2002. “The New Public Management: a Perspective from Africa.” In: New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewen Ferlie, 210–226. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. 2007. “Why There is No Such Thing as “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Language and Communication, 27(4): 337–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Paul Davidson. 2008. “Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-Genre Study of British Policy-Making.” Discourse and Society 19(3): 307–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotwal, Ashok, and Kate Power. 2013. “Eating Words: a Discourse Historical Analysis of the Public Debates over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act”. On the Horizon 23(3): 174–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, David. 1999. “The Government of Wales Act: an Act for Laws to be Ministered in Wales in Like Form as it is in This Realm?” Cambrian Law Review 301: 60–71.Google Scholar
Levitas, Ruth, Christina Pantazis, Eldin Fahmy, David Gordon, Eva Lloyd, and Demi Patsios. 2007. The Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion. London: The Social Exclusion Task Force. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
Lewis, Glynn, and Louis Appleby. 1988. “Personality disorder: The Patients Psychiatrists Dislike” British Journal of Psychiatry 153(1): 44–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markham, Dominic, and Peter Trower. 2003. “The Effects of the Psychiatric Label ‘Borderline Personality Disorder’ on Nursing Staff’s Perceptions and Causal Attributions for Challenging Behaviours” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 42(3): 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Steve. 2002. “Best Value: New Public Management or New Direction?” In: New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewen Ferlie, 129–140. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAnulla, Stuart. 2010. “Heirs to Blair’s Third Way? David Cameron’s Triangulating Conservatism.” British Politics 5(3): 286–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Martin. 2017. “Interpreting Theresa May’s vision of a shared society.” British Medical Journal 3561: j213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milbourne, Linda. 2002. “Unspoken Exclusion: Experience of Continued Marginalisation from Education among ‘Hard to Reach’ Groups of Adults and Children in the UK.” British Journal of the Sociology of Education 23(2): 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Neil, Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, and Jack Donnelly. 1987. “Liberalism, Human Rights, and Human Dignity.” American Political Science Review 81(3): 921–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NIMHE (National Institute for Mental Health in England). 2003. Personality Disorder: No Longer a Diagnosis for Exclusion. London: Department of Health. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL]
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In: Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, second edition, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 1998. “Rethinking Recontextualization in Professional Discourse Studies: an Epilogue”. Text 18(2): 301–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sayce, Liz. 2001. “Social Inclusion and Mental Health”. Psychiatric Bulletin 25(4): 121–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Kuno, and Isabella Proeller. 2002. “The New Public Management: A Perspective from Mainland Europe.” In: New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, edited by Kathleen McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewen Ferlie, 163–180. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Allan, and Brenda Twomey. 2002. “Labour Market Experiences of People with Disabilities” Labour Market Trends August: 415–27.Google Scholar
Stephens, Mark, Nicky Burns, and Lisa MacKay. 2002. Social Market or Safety Net? British Social Rented Housing in a European Context. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Kitty. 2009. “Labour’s Record on Inequality and the New Opportunities White Paper” Political Quarterly 80 (3): 427–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unger, Johnny W. 2013. “Rebranding the Scottish Executive.” Journal of Language and Politics 12(1): 59–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila. 2006. “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring” Organization Studies 27(6): 789–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bismark, O. 1895. Fürst Bismarck: Neue Tischgespräche und Interviews, Vol. 11. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Teun. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Nicholas. 2015. “Tax Credits: Government Faces Showdown in House of Lords.” The Guardian, 26 Oct 2015. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
Welsh Assembly Government. 2007. A Strategy for Social Services in Wales over the Next Decade: Fulfilled Lives, Supportive Communities. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
. 2008. Working Together to Reduce Harm: The Substance Misuse Strategy for Wales 2008-2018. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. Accessed 24 February 2017. [URL].
Wilson, David. 2001. “Local Government: Balancing Diversity and Uniformity.” Parliamentary Affairs 54(2): 289–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1999. “Critical Discourse Analysis at the End of the 20th Century.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 32(1): 185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Friend or Foe: the Defamation or Legitimate and Necessary Criticism? Reflections on Recent Political Discourse in Austria.” Language and Communication 22(4): 495–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, second edition, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Sayers, Dave
2024. Using language to help people, or using people to help language? A capabilities framework of language policy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Hannigan, Ben
2022. Observations from a small country: mental health policy, services and nursing in Wales. Health Economics, Policy and Law 17:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020. The Main Approaches to CDA/CDS. In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Language Policy in Business [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 89], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.