Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:3 (2017) ► pp.412–433

Five turns of the screw

A CADS analysis of the European Parliament

| Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
The present paper proposes a CADS-based analysis of European Parliament speeches, by merging (C)DA theoretical constructs (inspired by Laclau and Mouffe 1985) and CL tools. In this fashion, the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus of Parliamentary Speeches Archive (ECPC) is examined along synchronic and diachronic, quantitative and qualitative lines, in an inductive study that commutes from the micro-text to the macro-context.
Keywords: European Parliament, Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS), ECPC
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(C)DA constructs
  • 3.CL tools
  • 4.The ECPC Archive
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1.The first turn of the screw: A (static) snapshot of EP_en
    • 5.2The second turn of the screw: A moving image of EP_en
    • 5.3The third turn of the screw: A qualitative cut
    • 5.4The fourth turn of the screw: The political axis
    • 5.5Into the macro-context
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 12 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15020.cal
References (38)
References
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Anthony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul, ed. 2004. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul, Cinzia Bevitori, and Elisabetta Zoni. 2004. “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britain, Germany and Italy.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 185–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul, and Félix San Vicente. 2004. “Ways of Talking about Work in Parliamentary Discourse in Britain and Spain.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 237–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balcerowicz, Leszek, Andrzej Rzonca, Lech Kalina, and Aleksander Łaszek. 2013. Economic Growth in the European Union. Brussels: The Lisbon Council.Google Scholar
Bevitori, Cinzia. 2004. “Negotiating Conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 87–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, and Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics : Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, ed. 2002. Journal of Language and Politics, 2:1.Google Scholar
“Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union.” 2008. OJ C115/13.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Andrei, and Liliana-Aurora Constantinescu. 2013. “The Global Crisis Financial and Economic Crisis and the Main Priorities of the European Union for 2020.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov 6 (55).1: 171–174.Google Scholar
Copeland, Paul, and Scott James. 2011. “From Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020: The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Governance and Discourse of Economic Reform.” UACES 41st Annual Conference: 1–16.Google Scholar
Dibattista, Denise. 2004. “Legitimising and Informative Discourse in the Kosovo Debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 151–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2005. Commission Work Programme for 2005. [URL]. Accessed September 8, 2015.
European Parliament. 2015. “European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.” [URL]. Accessed September 8, 2015.
Eurostat. 2005. Eurostat Yearbook 2005. [URL]. Accessed September 8, 2015.
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli. 2004. “What Can Corpus Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 351–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Gerlinde Mautner. 2004. “Computer Applications in Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin, Ann Hewings, and Kieran O’Halloran, 216–28. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2012. “Applications of the Lexical Bundles Method in Historical Corpus Research.” In Corpus Data across Languages and Disciplines, ed. by Piotr Cap, 83–95. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kotz, David M. “The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 41.31 (2009): 305–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985/2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1997. “The Discourse of the Illegal Immigration Debate: A Case Study in the Politics of Representation.” Discourse and Society 8 (2): 249–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina. 2014. “The Potential of Narrative Strategies in the Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Positions and Social Change.” In From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis across Disciplines, ed. by Bertie Kaal, 171–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran, and Caroline Coffin. 2004. “Checking Overinterpretation and Underinterpretation: Help from Corpora in Critical Linguistics.” In Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin, Ann Hewings, and Kieran O’Halloran, 257–97. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orpin, Debora. 2005. “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10: 1: 37–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 2007. “Corpus Linguistics 25+ Year On.” In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, 11–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
2002. “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 203–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Discourse and Context A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasta, Nicoleta. 2004. “Consent and Dissent in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates on the 1998 Gulf Crisis.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 111–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk (eds.). 2000. Racism at the Top Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vigier, Francisco J. & María del Mar Sánchez
2017. Using Parallel Corpora to Study the Translation of Legal System-Bound Terms: The Case of Names of English and Spanish Courts. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.