Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:3 (2017) ► pp. 412–433

Five turns of the screw

A CADS analysis of the European Parliament

| Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
The present paper proposes a CADS-based analysis of European Parliament speeches, by merging (C)DA theoretical constructs (inspired by Laclau and Mouffe 1985) and CL tools. In this fashion, the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus of Parliamentary Speeches Archive (ECPC) is examined along synchronic and diachronic, quantitative and qualitative lines, in an inductive study that commutes from the micro-text to the macro-context.
Keywords: European Parliament, Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS), ECPC
Published online: 12 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15020.cal
References

References

Baker, Paul
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010 Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Anthony McEnery
2005 “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul
ed. 2004 Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul, Cinzia Bevitori, and Elisabetta Zoni
2004 “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britain, Germany and Italy.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 185–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Paul, and Félix San Vicente
2004 “Ways of Talking about Work in Parliamentary Discourse in Britain and Spain.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 237–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balcerowicz, Leszek, Andrzej Rzonca, Lech Kalina, and Aleksander Łaszek
2013 Economic Growth in the European Union. Brussels: The Lisbon Council.Google Scholar
Bevitori, Cinzia
2004 “Negotiating Conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 87–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan, and Reppen, Randi
1998 Corpus Linguistics : Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
ed. 2002 Journal of Language and Politics, 2:1.Google Scholar
“
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union” 2008 OJ C115/13.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Andrei, and Liliana-Aurora Constantinescu
2013 “The Global Crisis Financial and Economic Crisis and the Main Priorities of the European Union for 2020.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov 6 (55).1: 171–174.Google Scholar
Copeland, Paul, and Scott James
2011 “From Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020: The Impact of the Financial Crisis on the Governance and Discourse of Economic Reform.” UACES 41st Annual Conference: 1–16.Google Scholar
Dibattista, Denise
2004 “Legitimising and Informative Discourse in the Kosovo Debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 151–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
European Commission
2005 Commission Work Programme for 2005. http://​eur​-lex​.europa​.eu​/LexUriServ​/LexUriServ​.do​?uri​=COM:2005:0015:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed September 8, 2015.
European Parliament
2015 “European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.” http://​www​.europarl​.europa​.eu​/thinktank​/en​/document​.html​?reference​=EPRS​_ATA(2015)549016. Accessed September 8, 2015.
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli
2004 “What Can Corpus Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 351–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2010 European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Gerlinde Mautner
2004 “Computer Applications in Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin, Ann Hewings, and Kieran O’Halloran, 216–28. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2012 “Applications of the Lexical Bundles Method in Historical Corpus Research.” In Corpus Data across Languages and Disciplines, ed. by Piotr Cap, 83–95. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kotz, David M.
“The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 41.3 (2009): 305–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal
1985/2001 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1997 “The Discourse of the Illegal Immigration Debate: A Case Study in the Politics of Representation.” Discourse and Society 8 (2): 249–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina
2014 “The Potential of Narrative Strategies in the Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Positions and Social Change.” In From Text to Political Positions: Text Analysis across Disciplines, ed. by Bertie Kaal, 171–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran, and Caroline Coffin
2004 “Checking Overinterpretation and Underinterpretation: Help from Corpora in Critical Linguistics.” In Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Caroline Coffin, Ann Hewings, and Kieran O’Halloran, 257–97. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orpin, Debora
2005 “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10: 1: 37–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
ed. 2013 Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1996 Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
2007 “Corpus Linguistics 25+ Year On.” In Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, 11–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2000 “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 203–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Discourse and Context A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasta, Nicoleta
2004 “Consent and Dissent in British and Italian Parliamentary Debates on the 1998 Gulf Crisis.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 111–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk
(eds.) 2000 Racism at the Top Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Vigier, Francisco J. & María del Mar Sánchez
2017.  In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.