Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:6 (2017) ► pp.782–808

Linguistic landscape of Gezi Park protests in Turkey

A discourse analysis of graffiti

 | Illinois State University
 | Illinois State University
Gezi Park protests that rocked Turkey in 2013 left a significant mark in the country’s collective memory and contributed to the construction of a new language of political resistance. To challenge an increasingly authoritarian government, the protesters used novel repertoires of contention, particularly political graffiti. To better understand different types of linguistic and symbolic communication tools used in the public space during Gezi Park protests and their impact on different set of audiences, this article explores the following research questions: (i) What indexical properties are used in the languages used in graffiti, and what do they mean for understanding the various audiences that the protesters engaged? (ii) What counter-narratives are created in the graffiti produced during Gezi Park protests?
Keywords: Linguistic landscape, indexicality, social protests, graffiti, Turkey, Turkish politics, Gezi Park, protest movements, collective action, resistance, Mediated Discourse Analysis (MDA)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: 2013 Gezi Park protests
  • 3.Theoretical framework: Language in the public sphere
    • Graffiti as a form of transgressive writing
  • 4.Data collection and analysis
  • 5.The analysis of Gezi graffiti
    • Language mixing and code-meshing in graffiti
    • Appropriation of local and global pop culture
    • Using political humor to highlight individual liberty restrictions
    • Blurring of ideological boundaries through graffiti
    • Police Brutality and Media Censorship in the Linguistic Landscape of Gezi
    • Right to the City: Ownership of the Urban Space in Graffiti and Political Posters
    • Target Audiences
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15037.sel
References (25)
References
Backhaus, Peter. 2007. Linguistic Landscapes. A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bayat, Asef. 2010. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 261: 611–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K., John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones. 2008. “Mediated Discourse Analysis.” In Advances in Discourse Studies, edited by Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew, and Rodney H. Jones, 229–232. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ete, Hatem and Coşkun Taştan. 2013. Kurgu ile Gerçeklik Arasında Gezi Eylemleri [Gezi Movement between Construction and Reality]. Ankara: SETA Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vakfı Yayınları [SETA Politics, Economics and Society Research Foundation Publishing].Google Scholar
Huebner, Thom. 2006. “Bangkok’s linguistics landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change.” In Linguistics landscape: a new approach to multilingualism, edited by Durk Gorter, 31–51. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Semiotic landscape. Language, image, space. NY: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gorter, Durk. 2006. Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Christiane. 2013. “The Visual Emergence of the Occupy Gezi Movement: Part One, Oh Biber!” Jadaliyya accessed at [URL]
Hanauer, David. I. 2004. “Silence, voice and erasure: psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination.” The Arts in Psychotherapy 311: 29–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “The discursive construction of the separation wall at abu dis: Graffiti as political discourse.” Journal of Language & Politics 10 (3): 301–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kılıç, Özlem. 2013. Türkiye’nin Gezi’si: Gezi’ye bir de Her Açıdan Bakın [Turkey’s Gezi: Have a look at Gezi from Every Angle]. Istanbul: Postiga Yayınları.Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue and Richard Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (1): 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oktem, Kerem. 2013. “Why Turkey’s mainstream media chose to show penguins rather than protests.” The Guardian, June 9.Google Scholar
Ma, Eric K-w. 2002. “Translocal spatiality.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 5(2): 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2009a. “Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti.” In Linguistic landscape. Expanding the Scenery edited by Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter, 302–312. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls.” In Semiotic landscape. Language, image, space edited by Adam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 137–150. New York: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2010. Language as a local practice. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saygun, Atabey. 2013. “Kahrolsun Bağzı Şeyler” [Down with something or other!] accessed at [URL]
Scollon, Ron and Suzanne B. K. Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni. 2010. Linguistic landscape in the city. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana and Durk Gorter. 2009. Linguistic landscape. Expanding the scenery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Vershawn A. and Aja Y. Martinez. 2011. Code-meshing as world English: Pedagogy, policy, performance. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Miranda Correa, Melisa
2023. Contextual graffiti and collective action frames at the Chilean social outbreak in 2019. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 9:4 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Morlan, Marguerite & Steven Byrne
2023. Language choice and identity in the linguistic landscape of Barcelona. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Byrne, Steven & Erika Marcet
2022. La lluita continua: socio-political debate and the linguistic landscape of a Catalan city. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jenzen, Olu, Itir Erhart, Hande Eslen-Ziya, Umut Korkut & Aidan McGarry
2021. The symbol of social media in contemporary protest: Twitter and the Gezi Park movement. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27:2 ► pp. 414 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Christiana
2021. From public to digital spaces: Spatial and media practices of the 2017 ‘Unite Cyprus Now’ peace protests. Discourse, Context & Media 42 ► pp. 100504 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Hong & Brian Hok-Shing Chan
2021. Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Fina, Anna De
2020. MIGRANT YOUTH PUSH BACK. VIRTUAL FRIENDSHIPS AND EVERYDAY RESISTANCE IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 59:3 ► pp. 1833 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.