Politics in science
High modulation of engagement in intelligent design discourse
Intelligent design is a pseudoscientific concept conceived in an attempt to bring religion-based teaching into the classroom. As such, it is involved in a constant struggle for dialogic space with the dominant scientific discourse of the theory of evolution. Here, we use a corpus linguistic approach to study how intelligent design discourse uses engagement to forward its creationistic propositions and at the same time limit the propositions of the theory of evolution. The results suggest that intelligent design discourse employs engagement far more frequently than evolutionary biology discourse, mainly to counter opposing propositions and to entertain its own proposition in their stead. The underdog position of ID obligates it to highly modulated engagement in order forward its position, which is ultimately aimed at changing the political decision-making related to the teaching of science.
Keywords: scientific discourse, pseudoscience, intelligent design, politics, engagement, corpus linguistics
Published online: 12 June 2017
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
2000 “Science Test.” Accessed 14 January 2015. https://www.au.org/church-state/julyaugust-2000-church-state/featured/science-test.
2009 “Stance, interaction and the rhetorical patterns of restrictive adverbs: Discourse roles of only, just, simply and merely.” In Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, ed. by Maggie Charles, Susan Hunston and Diane Pecorari, 152–169. London: Continuum International Publishing.
Charles, Maggie, Hunston, Susan, and Pecorari, Diane
Chilton, Paul A., and Schäffner Christina
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and Matthiessen, Christian Matthias Ingemar Martin
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Memorandum Opinion 2004.” Accessed 12 January 2015. https://www.aclu.org/files/images/asset_upload_file577_ 23137.pdf.
Martin, James Robert, and White, Peter R. R.
McCabe, Anne, O’Donnell, Mick, and Whittaker Rachel
Miller, Kenneth R.
Pennock, Robert T.
Rayson, Paul, and Garside, Roger
2000 Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In proceedings of the workshop on Comparing Corpora, held in conjunction with the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1–8 October 2000, Hong Kong, pp. 1–6.
Thomson, Irene Taviss
Cited by 1 other publications
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.