Cover not available
Article published In:
Re/constructing Politics Through Social & Online Media: Discourses, ideologies, and mediated political practices
Edited by Michał Krzyżanowski and Joshua A. Tucker
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:2] 2018
► pp. 222–240

Microphone pokes as prank or political action?

Challenges to politicians’ visibility in the age of web TV

ORCID logo | Örebro University
| University of Queensland
The production of political talk is changing in response to ongoing changes in the overall media ecology. The rise of web TV challenges the previously dominant mediated politics of traditional broadcasting. In this paper we examine the practices of the mediatization of politics in the web TV environment via a humorous encounter between a self-declared “prankster” posing as a web TV broadcaster, and several Swedish politicians. The discussion reflects on various data emanating from this encounter to reveal how Web TV challenges traditional broadcasting norms, and offers fresh challenges for politicians who are continuously adapting to new media logics for exposure.
Keywords: Communicative activity types, interaction, political interviews, prank, tabloids, Web TV
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mediated interviews as communicative activity types
  • 3.Methodological approach and data
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Example 1: Prioritizing Live: Expressen’s filming of STHLM Panda
    • 4.2Example 2: Re-framing the Web TV Interviews – The Panda YouTube video
    • 4.3Example 3: Discourses of Humour, Ridicule, and Rage among Users
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Funding
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 20 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17004.kro
References (32)
References
Balmas, Meital. 2014. “When Fake Becomes Real: Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism.” Communication Research 41 (3): 430–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language Style as Audience Design.” In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, ed. by Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 240–250. New York: St Mattin’s Press Inc.Google Scholar
Boukes, Mark, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Marjolein Moorman, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2015. ”At Odds: Laughing and Thinking? The Appreciation, Processing, and Persuasiveness of Political Satire.” Journal of Communication 65 (5): 721–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2014. “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, John. 2000. Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty. London: I.B. Tauris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Andrew Tolson. 2013. Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Marianna Patrona. 2011. Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facht, Ulrika. 2016. Medie-Sverige 2016 [Media Sweden 2016]. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an ‘Overhearing’ Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hynes, Maria, Scott Sharpe, and Bob Fagan. 2007. “Laughing with the Yes Men: the Politics of Affirmation.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 21 (1): 107–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ju, Alice, Sun Ho Jeong, and Hsiang Iris Chyi. 2013. “Will Social Media Save Newspapers?” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Åsa, and Göran Eriksson. 2016. “Messy Interviews: Changing Conditions for Politicians’ Visibility on the Web.” Media, Culture & Society 38 (7):1015–1033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D. Landreville, and Michael A. Beam. 2009. “The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See.” International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (2): 212–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1992/1979. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, eds. Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Marriott, Stephanie. 2007. Live Television: Time, Space and the Broadcast Event. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Matthes, Jörg, and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2013. “The Swiss ‘Tina Fey Effect’: The Content of Late-night Political Humor and the Negative Effects of Political Parody on the Evaluation of Politicians.” Communication Quarterly 61 (5): 596–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2011. “The Accountability Interview, Politics and Change in UK Public Service Broadcasting.” In Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, eds. Mats Ekström, and Marianna Patrona, 33–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Negredo, Samuel. 2014. “Newspaper Video Content: Genres and Editorial Formats in Spain.” View 3 (6): 1–13.Google Scholar
Owen, Louise. 2011. “‘Identity Correction’ The Yes Men and Acts of Discursive ‘Leverage’.” Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 16 (2): 28–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Winfried. 2014. “Mediatization and New Media.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, ed. by Jesper Strömbäck, and Frank Esser, 57–73. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 228–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, and Frank Esser. 2014. ”Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, ed. by Jesper Strömbäck, and Frank Esser, 3–28. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2005. “The New Visibility.” Theory, Culture & Society 22 (6): 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolson, Andrew. 2006. Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar