Article published in:
Re/constructing Politics Through Social & Online Media: Discourses, ideologies, and mediated political practices
Edited by Michał Krzyżanowski and Joshua A. Tucker
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:2] 2018
► pp. 258–280

The Islamic State’s information warfare

Measuring the success of ISIS’s online strategy

| New York University
| New York University
How successful is the Islamic State’s online strategy? To what extent does the organization achieve its goals of attracting a global audience, broadcasting its military successes, and marketing the Caliphate? Using Twitter and YouTube search data, collected throughout 2015 and early 2016, we assess how suspected ISIS accounts, sympathizers, and opponents behave across two social media platforms, offering key insights into the successes and limitations of ISIS’s information warfare strategy. Analyzing the tweet content and metadata from 16,364 suspected ISIS accounts, we find that a core network of ISIS Twitter users are producing linguistically diverse narratives, touting battlefield victories and depicting utopian life in the Caliphate. Furthermore, a dataset of over 70 million tweets, as well as analysis YouTube search data, indicates that although pro-ISIS content spreads globally and remains on message, it is far less prolific than anti-ISIS content. However, this anti-ISIS content is not necessarily anti-extremist or aligned with Western policy goals.
Keywords: Islamic State, ISIS, social media
Published online: 18 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17005.sie
References

References

Bakker, Edwin, and Mark Singleton
2016 “Foreign Fghters in the Syria and Iraq Conflict: Statistics and Characteristics of a Rapidly Growing Phenomenon.” In Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, 9–25. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. M., and Jonathon Morgan
2015 “The ISIS Twitter Census: Defining and Describing the Population of ISIS Supporters on Twitter.” The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Bodine-Baron, Elizabeth, Todd C. Helmus, Madeline Magnuson, and Zev Winkelman
2016 “Examining ISIS Support and Opposition Networks on Twitter.” Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Joseph A., Shiraz Maher and Peter R. Neumann
2014 “#Greenbirds: Measuring Importance and Influence in Syrian Foreign Fighter Networks.” London: The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, King’s College.Google Scholar
Chatfield, Akemi Takeoka, Christopher G. Reddick and Uuf Brajawidagda
2015 “Tweeting Propaganda, Radicalization and Recruitment: Islamic State Supporters Multi-Sided Twitter Networks.” In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York, NY: ACM Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Gregory and Edward Sobiesk
2007 “An Honest Man has Nothing to Fear.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. New York, NY: ACM Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, Frances
2015 “The Role of Commitment Mechanisms in Terrorist Radicalization: Terrorist Utopias.” In ECPR Convention. Université de Montréal, Montreal: James Madison University.Google Scholar
Glenn, Camoron
2015 “The ISIS Primer.” Wilson Center, November 19 2015 https://​www​.wilsoncenter​.Org​/article​/the​-isis​-primer#sthash​.amU6Ts2o​.dpuf.
Ingram, Haroro J.
2014 “Three Traits of the Islamic States’ Information Warfare.” The RUSI Journal 159 (6): 4–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuter, Frauke, Stanley Presser, and Roger Tourangeau
2009 “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity.” Public Opinion Quarterly, no. 72: 847–865.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D., and Jacob N. Shapiro
2008 “The Political, Economic, and Organizational Sources of Terrorism.” In Terrorism, Economic Development, and Political Openness, ed. by Phillip Keefer, and Norman Loyoza, 209–232. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magdy, Walid, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber
2015 “#FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to Study the Antecedents of ISIS Support.” First Monday 21(2). http://​journals​.uic​.edu​/ojs​/index​.php​/fm​/article​/view​/6372​/5194.
Mitts, Tamar
2016 “From Isolation to Radicalization: The Socioeconomic Predictors of Support for ISIS in the West.” Unpublished Manuscript. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Simon
2016 “Operation Troll ISIS: Inside Anonymous’ War to Take Down Daesh.” Wired, October 6 2016 http://​www​.wired​.co​.uk​/article​/anonymous​-war​-to​-undermine​-daesh.
Pelletier, Ian R., Leif Lundmark, Rachel Gardner, Gina Scott Ligon, and Ramazan Kilinc
2016 “Why ISIS’s Message Resonates: Leveraging Islam, Socio-Political Catalysts and Adaptive Messaging.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39(10): 871–899. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plis, Ian
2015 “ISIS Videos Send Targeted Messages to their Worst Enemies.” The Daily Caller, March 23 2015 http://​dailycaller​.com​/2015​/03​/23​/new​-isis​-videos​-send​-targeted​-messages​-to​-its​-worst​-enemies/.
Pooley, Elizabeth
2015 “A New Sisterhood: The Allure of ISIS in Syria For Young Muslim Women in the UK.” PhD diss., Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Saad, Sabrine, Muriel Chamoun, and Stéphane B. Bazan
2015 “Infowar on the Web: When the Caliphate Goes Online.” In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Web Science Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, Erin, and Charlie Winter
2014 “Islamic State: The Changing Face of Modern Jihadism.” Quilliam International, November 4 2014 https://​www​.quilliaminternational​.com​/new​-quilliam​-report​-on​-islamic​-state/.
Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth
2014 “The Cost of Racial Animus on a Black Candidate: Evidence Using Google Search Data.” Journal of Public Economics, no. 118: 26–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Twitter Blogs
2016 “Combating Violent Extremism.” Twitter Blogs, February 6 2016 https://​blog​.twitter​.com​/2016​/combating​-violent​-extremism.
Veilleux-Lepage, Yannick
2014 “Retweeting the Caliphate: The Role of Soft-Sympathizers in the Islamic State’s Social Media Strategy.” Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Terrorism and Transnational Crime. Antalya, Turkey, December 4–7, 2014.
Wood, Graeme
2015 “What ISIS Really Wants.” The Atlantic, March 3 2015 https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/.Google Scholar
Weimann, Gabriel
2014 “New Terrorism and New media.” Wilson Center. May 13 2014 https://​www​.wilsoncenter​.org​/publication​/new​-terrorism​-and​-new​-media.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 893 ff. Crossref logo
Ceron, Andrea, Luigi Curini & Stefano M. Iacus
2019. ISIS at Its Apogee: The Arabic Discourse on Twitter and What We Can Learn From That About ISIS Support and Foreign Fighters. SAGE Open 9:1 ► pp. 215824401878922 ff. Crossref logo
Pfeifer, Hanna & Christoph Günther
2020.  In Visualität und Weltpolitik [Horizonte der Internationalen Beziehungen, ], ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Pfeifer, Hanna & Alexander Spencer
2019. Once upon a time. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1 ► pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
SIEGEL, ALEXANDRA A. & VIVIENNE BADAAN
2020. #No2Sectarianism: Experimental Approaches to Reducing Sectarian Hate Speech Online. American Political Science Review 114:3 ► pp. 837 ff. Crossref logo
Wagnsson, Charlotte
2020. What is at stake in the information sphere? Anxieties about malign information influence among ordinary Swedes. European Security 29:4 ► pp. 397 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.