References (27)
References
Bakker, Edwin, and Mark Singleton. 2016. “Foreign Fghters in the Syria and Iraq Conflict: Statistics and Characteristics of a Rapidly Growing Phenomenon.” In Foreign Fighters Under International Law and Beyond, 9–25. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. M., and Jonathon Morgan. 2015. “The ISIS Twitter Census: Defining and Describing the Population of ISIS Supporters on Twitter.” The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Bodine-Baron, Elizabeth, Todd C. Helmus, Madeline Magnuson, and Zev Winkelman. 2016. “Examining ISIS Support and Opposition Networks on Twitter.” Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Joseph A., Shiraz Maher and Peter R. Neumann. 2014. “#Greenbirds: Measuring Importance and Influence in Syrian Foreign Fighter Networks.” London: The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, King’s College.Google Scholar
Chatfield, Akemi Takeoka, Christopher G. Reddick and Uuf Brajawidagda. 2015. “Tweeting Propaganda, Radicalization and Recruitment: Islamic State Supporters Multi-Sided Twitter Networks.” In Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York, NY: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti, Gregory and Edward Sobiesk. 2007. “An Honest Man has Nothing to Fear.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. New York, NY: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cottee, Simon. 2014. “The Pornography of Jihadism.” The Atlantic, September 12, 2014. [URL].
. 2015. “ISIS and the Logic of Shock.” The Atlantic, February 6, 2015. [URL]
Flannery, Frances. 2015. “The Role of Commitment Mechanisms in Terrorist Radicalization: Terrorist Utopias.” In ECPR Convention. Université de Montréal, Montreal: James Madison University.Google Scholar
Glenn, Camoron. 2015. “The ISIS Primer.” Wilson Center, November 19, 2015. [URL].
Ingram, Haroro J. 2014. “Three Traits of the Islamic States’ Information Warfare.” The RUSI Journal 159 (6): 4–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuter, Frauke, Stanley Presser, and Roger Tourangeau. 2009. “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity.” Public Opinion Quarterly, no. 72: 847–865.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D., and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2008. “The Political, Economic, and Organizational Sources of Terrorism.” In Terrorism, Economic Development, and Political Openness, ed. by Phillip Keefer, and Norman Loyoza, 209–232. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magdy, Walid, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2015. “#FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to Study the Antecedents of ISIS Support.” First Monday 21(2). [URL].
Mitts, Tamar. 2016. “From Isolation to Radicalization: The Socioeconomic Predictors of Support for ISIS in the West.” Unpublished Manuscript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Simon. 2016. “Operation Troll ISIS: Inside Anonymous’ War to Take Down Daesh.” Wired, October 6, 2016. [URL].
Pelletier, Ian R., Leif Lundmark, Rachel Gardner, Gina Scott Ligon, and Ramazan Kilinc. 2016. “Why ISIS’s Message Resonates: Leveraging Islam, Socio-Political Catalysts and Adaptive Messaging.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39(10): 871–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plis, Ian. 2015. “ISIS Videos Send Targeted Messages to their Worst Enemies.” The Daily Caller, March 23, 2015. [URL].
Pooley, Elizabeth. 2015. “A New Sisterhood: The Allure of ISIS in Syria For Young Muslim Women in the UK.” PhD diss., Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Saad, Sabrine, Muriel Chamoun, and Stéphane B. Bazan. 2015. “Infowar on the Web: When the Caliphate Goes Online.” In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Web Science Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saltman, Erin, and Charlie Winter. 2014. “Islamic State: The Changing Face of Modern Jihadism.” Quilliam International, November 4, 2014. [URL].
Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth. 2014. “The Cost of Racial Animus on a Black Candidate: Evidence Using Google Search Data.” Journal of Public Economics, no. 1181: 26–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Twitter Blogs. 2016. “Combating Violent Extremism.” Twitter Blogs, February 6, 2016. [URL].
Veilleux-Lepage, Yannick. 2014. “Retweeting the Caliphate: The Role of Soft-Sympathizers in the Islamic State’s Social Media Strategy.” Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Terrorism and Transnational Crime. Antalya, Turkey, December 4–7, 2014.
Wood, Graeme. 2015. “What ISIS Really Wants.” The Atlantic, March 3, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/.Google Scholar
Weimann, Gabriel. 2014. “New Terrorism and New media.” Wilson Center. May 13, 2014. [URL].
YouTube. nd. “[URL].” Accessed January 5, 2017. [URL].
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Knuppe, Austin J. & Matthew Nanes
2024. When Bullets and Ballots Collide: How the Dissolution of the Anti-Islamic State Coalition Stalled Iraq’s Transition to Peacetime. Civil Wars 26:2  pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Bastos, Marco, Dan Mercea & Fábio Goveia
2023. Guy next door and implausibly attractive young women: The visual frames of social media propaganda. New Media & Society 25:8  pp. 2014 ff. DOI logo
Mohiuddin, Asif
2023. Islamism in the Digital Age: The Role of Cyberspace in Transforming Religious Authority. In Navigating Religious Authority in Muslim Societies,  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Tucker, Joshua A.
2023. Computational Social Science for Policy and Quality of Democracy: Public Opinion, Hate Speech, Misinformation, and Foreign Influence Campaigns. In Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy,  pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Colombo, Matteo & Luigi Curini
2022. A Thematic Study of the Topics in the Pro-IS and Anti-IS Tweets. In Discussing the Islamic State on Twitter [Middle East Today, ],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Colombo, Matteo & Luigi Curini
2022. The Research Methodology. In Discussing the Islamic State on Twitter [Middle East Today, ],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Colombo, Matteo & Luigi Curini
2022. Detecting the Sentiment Toward IS and Its Evolution. In Discussing the Islamic State on Twitter [Middle East Today, ],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Colombo, Matteo & Luigi Curini
2022. Introduction. In Discussing the Islamic State on Twitter [Middle East Today, ],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Colombo, Matteo & Luigi Curini
2022. The Enemy of My Enemy? Hostility and Sectarian Discourse Between Pro-IS and Anti-IS Arabic-Speaking Twitter Users. In Discussing the Islamic State on Twitter [Middle East Today, ],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Hampl, Marek
2021. The container and force schemas in political discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 11:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Romney, David, Amaney A Jamal, Robert O Keohane & Dustin Tingley
2021. The Enemy of My Enemy Is Not My Friend: Arabic Twitter Sentiment toward ISIS and the United States. International Studies Quarterly 65:4  pp. 1176 ff. DOI logo
Pfeifer, Hanna & Christoph Günther
2020. ISIS und die Inszenierung von Kulturgüterzerstörung für ein globales Publikum. In Visualität und Weltpolitik [Horizonte der Internationalen Beziehungen, ],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
SIEGEL, ALEXANDRA A. & VIVIENNE BADAAN
2020. #No2Sectarianism: Experimental Approaches to Reducing Sectarian Hate Speech Online. American Political Science Review 114:3  pp. 837 ff. DOI logo
Wagnsson, Charlotte
2020. What is at stake in the information sphere? Anxieties about malign information influence among ordinary Swedes. European Security 29:4  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6  pp. 893 ff. DOI logo
Ceron, Andrea, Luigi Curini & Stefano M. Iacus
2019. ISIS at Its Apogee: The Arabic Discourse on Twitter and What We Can Learn From That About ISIS Support and Foreign Fighters. SAGE Open 9:1  pp. 215824401878922 ff. DOI logo
Pfeifer, Hanna & Alexander Spencer
2019. Once upon a time. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.