Article published in:
Re/constructing Politics Through Social & Online Media: Discourses, ideologies, and mediated political practices
Edited by Michał Krzyżanowski and Joshua A. Tucker
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:2] 2018
► pp. 173–194

Political participation on Facebook during Brexit

Does user engagement on media pages stimulate engagement with campaigns?

| University of Copenhagen
| Lund University
| University of Copenhagen
This study investigates, over an 18-month period surrounding the 2016 Brexit referendum, the commenting activity of nearly 2 million Facebook users engaging with political news from British media or with the posts of referendum campaigns. We ask whether citizens’ engagement with political news on Facebook motivates their participation with political campaign posts, and we examine whether users commenting on campaign pages trend towards ideologically reinforcing media. Overall, we find comparatively low levels of commenting activity on the official referendum campaigns vis-à-vis the media, and the majority of users (70%) commented only once. Looking at the subset of users commenting on both page types (“cross-posters”), we identify a general spillover effect from media to campaign pages, suggesting a positive correlation between political interest and online participation on Facebook. Reverse spillover occurs immediately around and after the vote, with Remain cross-posters active on the Guardian while Leave cross-posters’ media engagement registers as more diffuse.
Keywords: big data, social media, polarization, political communication, referendum, Facebook comments, public pages, political campaigning
Published online: 20 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17009.dut
References

References

Bimber, Bruce, Marta C. Cunhill, Lauren Copeland, and Rachel Gibson
2015 “Digital Media and Political Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Interest across Acts and Over Time.” Social Science Computer Review 33: 21–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossetta, Michael, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, and Hans-Jörg Trenz
2017 “Engaging with European Politics through Twitter and Facebook : Participation beyond the National?” In Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era, ed. by Mauro Barisione, and Asimina Michailidou, 53–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulianne, Shelley
2011 “Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects between News Media and Political Interest.” Political Communication 28 (2): 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Dominic
2013 The Life Informatic: Newsmaking in the Digital Era. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel
2005 Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G.
2011 “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 10: 496–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cantijoch, Marta, David Cutts, and Rachel Gibson
2016 “Moving Slowly up the Ladder of Political Engagement: A ‘Spill-over’ Model of Internet Participation.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 26–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew
2013 The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter
2013 The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter, and Tobias Olsson
2008 “Facilitating Political Participation: Young Citizens, Internet and Civic Cultures.” In International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture, ed. by Kirsten Drotner, and Sonia Livingstone, 493–507. London: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, Claes H.
2007 The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Erik Peterson, and Rune Slothuus
2013 “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dutceac Segesten, Anamaria, and Michael Bossetta
2017 “A Typology of Political Participation Online: How Citizens used Twitter to Mobilize during the 2015 British General Elections.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (11): 1625–1643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank, and Jesper Strömbäck
2014 Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Heather K., Victoria Cordova, and Savannah Sipole
2014 “Twitter Style: An Analysis of how House Candidates used Twitter in their 2012 Campaigns.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (2): 454–462.Google Scholar
Freelon, Deen
2017 “Campaigns in Control: Analyzing Controlled Interactivity and Message Discipline on Facebook.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Becky, Mahana Mansfield, Ian Anderson, Josh Holder, Daan Louter, and Monica Ulmanu
2016 “The dark side of Guardian comments.” The Guardian, April 12 2016 https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/technology​/2016​/apr​/12​/the​-dark​-side​-of​-guardian​-comments.
Haleva-Amir, Sharon, and Karine Nahon
2016 “Electoral Politics on Social Media.” In Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Chrstian Christensen, 471–487. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini
2004 Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B.
2009 Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood
2015 “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 690–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leruth, Benjamin, Yordan Kutiyski, André Krouwel, and Nicholas J. Startin
2017 “Does the Information Source Matter? Newspaper Readership, Political Preferences and Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom, France and The Netherlands.” In Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media: Communicating Europe, Contesting Europe, ed. by Manuela Caiani, and Simona Guerra, 109–131. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus K., and Cristian Vaccari
2013 “Do People ‘Like’ Politicians on Facebook? Not Really: Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon.” International Journal of Communication 7: 2333–2356.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Rasmus T.
2014 “News Media Framing of Negative Campaigning.” Mass Communication and Society 17: 898–919. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pariser, Eli
2011 The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus
2005 “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 577–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, Stephen, Mark Shephard, and Lindsay Paterson
2015 “Online Discussion and the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum: Flaming Keyboards or Forums for Deliberation?” Electoral Studies 38: 192–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, Holli A., and de Vreese, Claes H.
2004 Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. London: Taylor & Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper, and Adam Shehata
2010 “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships between News Media exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research 49: 575–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cas R.
2009 Going Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia
2012 “Political Participation and Web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook.” Public Relations Review 38: 466–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Ayres Pinto, Danielle Jacon & Isabela Moraes
2020. As mídias digitais como ferramentas de manipulação de processos eleitorais democráticos: uma análise do caso Brexit. Revista de Estudios Sociales :74 ► pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Bouko, Catherine, July De Wilde, Sofie Decock, Orphée De Clercq, Valentina Manchia & David Garcia
2018. Reactions to Brexit in images: a multimodal content analysis of shared visual content on Flickr. Visual Communication ► pp. 147035721878053 ff. Crossref logo
Bouko, Catherine & David Garcia
2020.  In Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation, ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
de-la-Garza-Montemayor, Daniel-Javier , José-Antonio Peña-Ramos & Fátima Recuero-López
2019. Online political participation of young people in Mexico, Spain and Chile. Comunicar 27:61 ► pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Fierro, Pedro, Patricio Aroca & Patricio Navia
2020. How people access the internet and the democratic divide: Evidence from the Chilean region of Valparaiso 2017, 2018 and 2019. Technology in Society 63 ► pp. 101432 ff. Crossref logo
Haenschen, Katherine
2020. Self-Reported Versus Digitally Recorded: Measuring Political Activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review 38:5 ► pp. 567 ff. Crossref logo
Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo & David Valle-Cruz
2020. Sentiment Analysis of Facebook Users Reacting to Political Campaign Posts. Digital Government: Research and Practice 1:2 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.