Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:1 (2019) ► pp.1–20

Fixing points on a shifting landscape

Truth, lies and politics in two reader comments pages

ORCID logo | University of Navarra
This paper focuses on reader comments published in two online UK newspapers (Mail Online and Independent) in response to articles about one discreditable incident involving a far-right political leader. The concepts of articulation and fixation are used to examine how these readers engage with the politician’s actions using ethical categories. While Independent readers build theoretical articulations between the politician’s actions and a generalised crisis of confidence in politics, readers of the Mail Online, regardless of their political sympathies, accept ethical categories as fixed points to anchor the discourse.
Keywords: political discourse, reader comments, political logics, articulation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Online reader forums
    • 1.2Discourse approach
    • 1.3Texts and method
  • 2.Lies and politics in the Independent
    • 2.1Lying politicians
    • 2.2Distance and disaffection
    • 2.3Closing down the discussion
  • 3.Truth and lies in the Mail Online
    • 3.1Humanising the political
    • 3.2Simplifying the terms of debate
    • 3.3Firm points of reference
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • Bibliography
Published online: 14 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17035.bre
References (38)
Bibliography
Arendholtz, Jenny. 2013. (In)appropriate Online Behaviour: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2011. “Reconstructing Babel: discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the interpretive arc.” Discourse Studies 13 (5): 519–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bingham, A., and Mark Conboy. 2015. Tabloid century: the popular press in Britain, 1896 to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canning, Patricia. 2018. “ ‘No ordinary crowd’: foregrounding a ‘hooligan schema’ in the construction of witness narratives following the Hillsborough Football Stadium disaster.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 237–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin de Cleen. 2007. “Bringing discourse theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (2): 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. “The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation.” Political Communication 221: 147–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downs, William. 2012. Political extremism in democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2017. “After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (1): 1. 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FT View. 2016. The fight for Britain’s working class. Financial Times. 1 December [URL]
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. ”Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations.” Political Studies Review 61: 155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, Darren. 2015. “Discourse, affect and surveillance: gender conflict in the omniopticon.” Journalism and Discourse Studies 1 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Kelsey, Darren, and Bennett, Lucy. 2014. Discipline and resistance on social media. Discourse, Context & Media 31, 37–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin. 2017. “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4), 566–581 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Littler, Mark, and Matthew Feldman. 2017. “Social media and the cordon sanitaire.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 510–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macintyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford University Press, Stanford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2016. “Europe’s populist surge.” Foreign Affairs 95 (6): 25–30.Google Scholar
Prins, Baukje. 2004. Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
Rear, David, and Alan Jones. 2013. “Discursive struggle and contested signifiers in the arenas of education policy and work skills in Japan.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (4): 375–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Richet, Bertrand. 2013. “Fanning the flames? A study of insult forums on the Internet.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 223–240. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2016. The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Lasse. 2017. British multiculturalism and the politics of representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unger, Johann, Ruth Wodak, and Majid KhosraviNik. 2016. “Critical discourse studies and social media data.” In Qualitative Research, ed. by David Silverman, 227–293. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Brussel, Leen. 2018. “The right to die. A Belgian case-study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society 40 (3): 381–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “Introduction.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2017. “Right-wing populism in Europe and USA.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 471–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Mark. 2013. Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Yardi, Sarita, and Danah Boyd. 2010. Dynamic debates. An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (5): 316–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan. 2014. “Articulating metalinguistic and political awareness in Flemish discourses on integration and allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (3): 283–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Davidjants, Jaana
2022. Witnessing in Participatory Journalism: Siege of Aleppo and Narratives of Authenticity. Baltic Screen Media Review 10:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.