Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 18:1 (2019) ► pp.1–20
Fixing points on a shifting landscape
Truth, lies and politics in two reader comments pages
This paper focuses on reader comments published in two online UK newspapers (Mail Online and Independent) in response to articles about one discreditable incident involving a far-right political leader. The concepts of articulation and fixation are used to examine how these readers engage with the politician’s actions using ethical categories. While Independent readers build theoretical articulations between the politician’s actions and a generalised crisis of confidence in politics, readers of the Mail Online, regardless of their political sympathies, accept ethical categories as fixed points to anchor the discourse.
Keywords: political discourse, reader comments, political logics, articulation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Online reader forums
- 1.2Discourse approach
- 1.3Texts and method
- 2.Lies and politics in the Independent
- 2.1Lying politicians
- 2.2Distance and disaffection
- 2.3Closing down the discussion
- 3.Truth and lies in the Mail Online
- 3.1Humanising the political
- 3.2Simplifying the terms of debate
- 3.3Firm points of reference
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
-
Bibliography
References
Bibliography
Arendholtz, Jenny
2013 (In)appropriate Online Behaviour: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Bell, Allan
2011 “Reconstructing Babel: discourse analysis, hermeneutics and the interpretive arc.” Discourse Studies 13 (5): 519–568.
Bingham, A., and Mark Conboy
2015 Tabloid century: the popular press in Britain, 1896 to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canning, Patricia
2018 “ ‘No ordinary crowd’: foregrounding a ‘hooligan schema’ in the construction of witness narratives following the Hillsborough Football Stadium disaster.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 237–255.
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin de Cleen
2007 “Bringing discourse theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (2): 265–293.
Dahlgren, Peter
2005 “The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation.” Political Communication 221: 147–162.
Downs, William
2012 Political extremism in democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Freeden, Michael
2017 “After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (1): 1. 11.
FT View
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge: London.
2008 ”Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations.” Political Studies Review 61: 155–169.
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips
2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Kelsey, Darren
2015 “Discourse, affect and surveillance: gender conflict in the omniopticon.” Journalism and Discourse Studies 1 (2): 1–21.
Kelsey, Darren, and Bennett, Lucy
2014 Discipline and resistance on social media. Discourse, Context & Media 31, 37–45.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4), 566–581
Laclau, Ernesto
1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
2001 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
Littler, Mark, and Matthew Feldman
Macintyre, Alasdair
1981 After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Moffitt, Benjamin
2016 The global rise of populism: Performance, political style and representation. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Mudde, Cas
2016 “Europe’s populist surge.” Foreign Affairs 95 (6): 25–30.
Prins, Baukje
2004 Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
Rear, David, and Alan Jones
2013 “Discursive struggle and contested signifiers in the arenas of education policy and work skills in Japan.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (4): 375–394.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2009 “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
Richet, Bertrand
2013 “Fanning the flames? A study of insult forums on the Internet.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 223–240. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Standing, Guy
2016 The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
Stavrakakis, Yannis
1999 Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.
Thomassen, Lasse
2017 British multiculturalism and the politics of representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Unger, Johann, Ruth Wodak, and Majid KhosraviNik
2016 “Critical discourse studies and social media data.” In Qualitative Research, ed. by David Silverman, 227–293. London: Sage.
Van Brussel, Leen
2018 “The right to die. A Belgian case-study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society 40 (3): 381–396.
Wodak, Ruth
2008 “Introduction.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2015 The politics of fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski
Wheeler, Mark
2013 Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Yardi, Sarita, and Danah Boyd
2010 Dynamic debates. An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (5): 316–327.
Zienkowski, Jan
2014 “Articulating metalinguistic and political awareness in Flemish discourses on integration and allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (3): 283–306.