Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a spatio-cognitive discourse world
A critical contrastive analysis of political discourse
This paper seeks to apply a cognitive-linguistic approach to critical discourse studies in an investigation of epistemic stancetaking and types of inter/subjectivity of the speaker in political discourse. More specifically, the paper presents an analysis of responses by three different politicians, i.e. John Kerry, Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin, to the chemical weapons attack in Syria in August 2013. By incorporating cognitive-linguistic theories in a critical investigation of language, I address diverging representations of the same event and their discursive functions in representing underlying ideologies and motifs of the respective politicians. Specifically, I propose a more nuanced incorporation of epistemic stance in a spatio-cognitive representation of discourse. My analysis shows that type of inter/subjectivity has bearing on the epistemic quality of a proposition. The more prominently a speaker construes him-/herself as evaluator of an event, the stronger his/her assertions become, which is equally visible in a discourse space model.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical and methodological framework: Epistemic stancetaking and speaker objectification in a discourse space model
- 2.1Epistemic stancetaking and types of speaker objectification
- 2.2Spatio-cognitive discourse worlds or discourse space theory
- 3.Data: The 2013 chemical weapons attack in Syria
- 4.Construing the chemical attack in Syria: A critical contrastive analysis
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (40)
Anthony, Lawrence
2014 AntConc (
Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from
[URL]
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul
2014 Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William, and David A. Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Earnest, Josh
2013 “
Statement by Principal Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest on Allegations of Chemical Weapons Use in Syria.”
The White House 21 August 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Fairclough, Norman
2014 “
A Critical Agenda for Education.” In
The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis, ed. by
Johannes Angermüller,
Dominique Maingeueneau, and
Ruth Wodak, 378–387. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2002 The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J.
1976 “
Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.”
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech 280 (1): 20–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Roger, and Gunter Kress
1979 “
Critical Linguistics.” In
Language and Control, ed. by
Roger Fowler, 185–213. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2007 “
Critical Discourse Analysis and Conceptualisation: Mental Spaces, Blended Spaces and Discourse Spaces in the British National Party.” In
Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory, ed. by
Christopher Hart, and
Dominik Lukeš, 107–131. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2008 “
Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework.”
Critical Discourse Studies 5 (2): 91–106.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2011 “
Legitimizing Assertions and the Logico-Rhetorical Module: Evidence and Epistemic Vigilance in Media Discourse on Immigration.”
Discourse Studies 13 (6): 751–814.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2014 Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2015 “
Viewpoint in Linguistic Discourse: Space and Evaluation in News Reports of Political Protests.”
Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 238–260.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher
2016 “
The Visual Basis of Linguistic Meaning and Its Implications for Critical Discourse Studies: Integrating Cognitive Linguistic and Multimodal Methods.
Discourse & Society 27 (3): 335–350.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, Veronika
2005 “
Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Cognition: Evidence from Business Media Discourse.”
Discourse & Society 16 (2): 199–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George
2009 The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics. London: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2013 Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2011 “
Epistemic Legitimising Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse.”
Discourse Studies 13 (6): 789–797.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2013 “
Stancetaking and Inter/Subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown.” In
English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by
Juana I. Marín Arrese,
Marta Carretero,
Jorge Arús Hita, and
Johan van der Auwera, 411–446. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2015 “
Epistemicity and stance: A cross-linguistic study of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish.”
Discourse Studies 17 (2): 210–225.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Halloran, Kieran
2003 Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven
1997 How the Mind Works. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, Günter, and René Dirven
Sorenson, David S.
2016 Syria in Ruins: The Dynamics of the Syrian Civil War. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, Peter
1999 “
Towards a Critical Cognitive Linguistics?” In
Discourses of War and Conflict, ed. by
Annette Combrink, and
Ina Biermann, 510–28. Potchefstroom: Ptochefstroom University Press. Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Talmy, Leonard
2006 “
Grammatical Construal.” In
Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed. by
Dirk Geeraerts, 69–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullmann, Stefanie
2017 “
Conceptualising Force in the Context of the Arab Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of International Mass Media Reports and Twitter Posts.”
Discourse & Communication 11 (2): 160–178.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
United Nations
2013a “
Report of the United Nations Mission to Investigate Allegations of the Use of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic on the alleged use of chemical weapons in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013”
16 September 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
United Nations
2013b “
United Nations Mission to Investigate Allegations of the Use of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic”
12 December 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
United Nations
2014 “
Removal of Syria’s chemical weapons material complete, announces OPCW-UN mission”
23 June 2014 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993 “
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.”
Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sources of political speeches
Al-Assad, Bashar
2013 “
Speech.”
Rossiya 24 13 September 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Kerry, John
2013 “
Statement on Syria.”
The White House 30 August 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Putin, Vladimir
2013 “
The Syrian Alternative.”
The New York Times 12 September 2013 Retrieved from
[URL] on 17 February 2018.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Ma, Qian & Qiufang Wen
2023.
Can space be conceptualized in a different way in political discourse? An extended application of Discourse Space Theory.
Discourse & Society 34:6
► pp. 712 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Haselow, Alexander
2020.
Expressing stance in spoken political discourse—The function of parenthetical inserts.
Language Sciences 82
► pp. 101334 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.