This paper presents a discourse-mythological analysis of the rhetoric of a pioneering Pan-African and Ghana’s
independence leader, Kwame Nkrumah, drawing on Ruth Wodak’s discourse-historical approach to critical discourse analysis. The
thesis of the paper is that Nkrumah’s discourse, in its focus on the emancipation and unification of Africa, can be characterized
as mythic, a discursive exhortation of Africa to demonstrate to the world that it can better govern itself than the colonizers. In
this vein, the paper analyzes four discursive strategies employed by Nkrumah in the creation and projection of his mythology: the
introduction or creation of new discourse events, presupposition and implication, involvement (the use of indexicals) and lexical
structuring and reiteration. This study is, therefore, presented as a case study of mythic discourse within the domain of
politics.
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies, trans. A. Lavers. London: Paladin.
Boticci, Chiara. 2007. A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flood, Christopher. 2002. Political Myth. London: Routledge.
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language. New York: Academic Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Flowerdew, John. 1997. “The Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal: A Case Study in the Creation of Mythic Discourse”. Discourse & Society 8(4): 453–477.
Fowler, Roger, Hodge, Roger, Kress, Gunther, and Trew, Anthony. 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Gastil, John. 1992. “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society 3(4): 469–500.
Geis, Michael L.1987. The Language of Politics. New York: Springer.
Halliday, Michael A. K.1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Kelsey, Darren. 2015. Media, Myth and Terrorism: A Discourse-Mythological Analysis of the Blitz Spirit in British Newspaper Responses to the July 7th Bombings. London: Palgrave.
Kelsey, Darren. 2017. Media and Affective Mythologies: Discourse, Archetypes and Ideology in Contemporary Politics. London: Palgrave.
Lewis, William F.1987. “Telling America’s story: Narrative form and the Reagan Presidency”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 731: 280–302.
Nujomah, Sam. 2013. Statement by His Excellency Dr. Sam Nujoma, the Founding President of the Republic of Namibia and the Father of the Namibian Nation, on the Occasion of the African Youth and Intergenerational Forum during the 50th Anniversary of the OAU/AU. Retrieved from [URL] on May25.
Van Dijk, Teun A.1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society 4(2): 249–283.
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. New York: Longman.
Wodak, Ruth. 2002. “The Discourse Historical Approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–69. London: Sage.
2024. “Let’s talk divorce”: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of Oduduwa secessionist discourse. Multimodal Communication
Henaku, Nancy, Mark Nartey, Ruby Pappoe, G. Edzordzi Agbozo & Eliasu Mumuni
2024. Election Discourse in Africa: Some Critical Considerations. In Communication and Electoral Politics in Ghana, ► pp. 1 ff.
Yu, Yating, Dennis Tay & Qian Yue
2024. Media representations of China amid COVID-19: a corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Media International Australia 191:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Lock, Etienne
2023. Rethinking Decolonization in “Sub-Saharan Africa”: Toward Reinventionism. Journal of Asian and African Studies
Nartey, Mark
2020. Metaphor and Kwame Nkrumah’s construction of the unite or perish myth: a discourse-mythological analysis. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 646 ff.
Nartey, Mark
2021. Yvonne Nelson and the heroic myth of Yaa Asantewaa: a discourse-mythological case study of a Ghanaian celebrity. Critical Studies in Media Communication 38:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
2020. Mythological heroism in the discourse of Kwame Nkrumah. World Englishes 39:4 ► pp. 581 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.